WEEK 9 - Self-esteem
the higher it is, the more likely we are to treat others with respect
Government of California (1986) → raising self-esteem would solve many of the state’s problems
What is self esteem?
William
self esteem is defined as a certain average tone self feeling, independent of selfish reasons that we might have that each one of us carries.
agreeing with self satisfaction, good qualities and having a positive view about oneself shows great self esteem
feeling useless, good for nothing shows low self esteem
self esteem = success/pretensions
source of low self esteem include irrealistic goals and ideas about oneself
Higgins
Self discrepancies
actual self
ideal self
ought self
domain specific self esteem
evaluating oneself i terms of things that they might value
different types of self esteem: musical, physical, etc.
State self esteem: how you feel about yourself right now
Trait self esteem: how you feel about yourself in general
sometimes we are not fully aware of our self esteem
reaction time studies: how fast people associating negative/positive word to themselves
asking people how much they like letters (more self esteem = initials as greater self esteem)
single item self esteem scale
how much self esteem do you think you have → simply asking people what they think about themselves
Benefits of self esteem
lower self esteem in adolescence predict various outcomes later on in adulthood
poorer mental and physical health
more likely to be involved in criminal behaviour
more likely to have worse job prospects
lower self esteem prospectively predicts depression (but not vice versa) → casual direction
Strauman, Lemieux, Coe (1993)
anxious people had higher ideal selfs which after the priming it increased their anxiety→ higher cortisol levels, lower natural killer cell activity
Greenberg et al (1992)
measured anxiety → self-report anxiety and skin conductance (physical arousal)
puts whose self esteem had been boosted, anxiety was significant reduced for the thresh conditions
Terror management theory
humans uniquely aware of own mortality
anxiety buffer used to avoid paralysing terror
an individual’s personalised version of the cultural worldview
self esteem → attained by believing that one in living up tho the standards of value that are part of the cultural worldview
Self esteem as a ‘sociometer’
belongingness → desire to form and maintain lasting, positive and significant interpersonal relationships
sociometer → motivativates the qualities of interpersonal relatinships; motivates behaviours that help the person to maintain a minimum level of acceptance by other people.
evidence:
varies with inclusion/exclusion
trait self esteem correlated with pervceived appreciation or devaluation by others
importance of domains of self esteem linked to cultural values
Origins of self esteem
predictors of global self esteem
based on jame’s formula
average of domain-specific self-evaluations, weighted by importance
results from harter (1993)
self evaluations in important domains correlate with global self esteem at r= .70
self-evaluations in unimportant domains correlate with global sled-esteem at r= .30
Multiple domains
renege of correlations with global self worth
Self evaluation processes
self enhancement motive
selective memory for positive information
self serving attributions
basking in reflected glory
upward and downward social comparisons
other self evaluation motives
self verification
self assessment and self improvement
Cultural and self esteem
self esteem across cultures
is there a universal need for self-regard?
evidence for self-criticism rather than self enhancement among asian populations
asian populations show lower levels of self esteem than do north americans
pancultural self enhancement
2 separate groups of traits:
individualistic traits (eg. free, independent, unique)
collectivistic traits (eg. agreeable, loyal, respectful)
Americans: more individualistic
Japanese: more collectivist
Modesty in Chinese culture
Can et al. (2011)
Studies 1 & 2:
Self-rated modesty correlated negatively with explicit self-esteem in China and US
Self-rated modesty correlated positively with implicitself-esteem in China, but not in US
Study 3:
After describing selves modestly, Chinese (but not Americans) showed increased implicit self-esteem
After describing selves immodestly, Chinese (but not Americans) showed reduced implicit self-esteem
Indirect self enhancement
Muramoto (2003) → attributions of success and failure among 118 japanese undergraduates
ppts typically made self effacing attributions
expected close others to make supportive attributions → others understood them well
self evaluation across cultures
culture moderates self evaluation
what is positively valued
appropriate ways of maintaining and enhancing self esteem
The ‘positive illusions’ debate
benefits
happiness and contentment
ability to care for others
capacity for creative productive work
critique by Colvin and Block (1994)
are they really typical of most humans or just of university students in a lab setting?
how do you operationalise reality to suggest when that is not real?
group level not individual level
are these positive illusions really associated with better mental health?
STUDIES
ppts rated their personality + trained examiners and friends of ppts to rate the same characteristics
asked which characteristics were rated as more positive and more negative.
friends and assessors had negative impressions of people who self enhance → correlated with ‘ego resilience’
Taylor & Brown
accuracy is not necessary for mental health
however, it does not mean:
more illusion is better
all illusions are good
illusions are necessary for mental health
remaining problems
measuring positive illusions: what is reality and what is not?
defining mental health benefits: is there an important margin of illusions? Shorter benefits vs. long-term costs”
The ‘dark side’ of high self esteem
self esteem and aggression
self esteem that is insecure → aggressive behaviour due to self esteem being threatened
Baumeister, Smart ans Boden (1996)
reviewed evidence suggesting high or low self esteem among perpetrators of: murder, rape, domestic violence…
little psychological evidence in using measures of self esteem
considerable convergence in findings
- no evidence for ‘low self esteem’ hypothesis
- violent people favourable views of themselves → used violence to show superiority and this normally happens after threats to self esteem.
self esteem vs. narcissism
distinguish ‘secure’ forms of high self esteem from ‘inflates’ views of the self, or narcissism
Narcissism scale items
if i ruled the world, it would be a much better place
i’m going to be a great person
i am more capable than other people
narcissism and aggression
Bushman & Baumeister (1998) - STUDY
people gave more negative scores to those who they thought gave them negative scores
trying to shoe superiority
Is narcissism the answer?
rethinking self esteem
not just high to low - is it secure?
markers fragile/insecure high self esteem
all associated with greater defensiveness
optimal self-esteem = stable, ‘true’, congruent