Economic and Human Development

Defining Economic and Human Development

  • Economic Development: The process of increasing a country's wealth through the diversification of goods and services and increasing production efficiency.

    • Progress involves a structural shift from agriculture to manufacturing (simple to sophisticated), ultimately transitioning to a service- and professional-dominated postindustrial economy.

    • Measured by structural shifts in production and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita.

  • Human Development: The process of expanding the choices people have to lead lives they value, such as being well-fed, healthy, safe from violence, literate, numerate, and politically engaged.

  • Human Development Index (HDI): A composite measure ranging from 00 to 11, evaluating three components:

    • Health (life expectancy at birth).

    • Knowledge (adult literacy rates and school enrollments).

    • Standard of living (purchasing power parity income).

    • In 2012, Norway held the highest score (0.9550.955) and Mozambique the lowest (0.3130.313).

  • Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI): Accounts for internal inequality in the distribution of health, education, and income achievements.

    • Significant disparities between HDI and IHDI emerge in unequal nations (e.g., in 2012, the United States dropped from 3rd at 0.9370.937 to 16th at 0.8210.821; India dropped from 0.5540.554 to 0.3920.392).

Levels of Development and Global Poverty

  • Classification Criteria:

    • World Bank: Classifies economies by per capita income into high-, upper-middle-, lower-middle-, and low-income categories.

    • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): Categorizes nations by HDI into very high, high, medium, and low human development.

  • Extreme vs. Relative Poverty:

    • Extreme (Absolute) Poverty: Life-threatening poverty, defined by the World Bank as living on less than $1.25\text{\$}1.25 a day (adjusted for purchasing power).

    • Relative Poverty: Deprivation relative to the surrounding society's income and wealth; generally not life-threatening.

  • Poverty Trends and Regional Distribution:

    • Between 1990 and 2010, extreme poverty in developing regions fell from 43%43\% (1.91 billion1.91\text{ billion} people) to 21%21\% (1.22 billion1.22\text{ billion} people).

    • China: Accounted for three-fourths of global poverty reduction from 1981 to 2008, decreasing extreme poverty from 84%84\% to 13%13\%.

    • Sub-Saharan Africa: Possesses the highest percentage of people living in extreme poverty and low capabilities.

    • South Asia: Holds the largest absolute number of people in extreme poverty and low capabilities.

State Capacity, Governance, and Development

  • State Power:

    • Infrastructural Power: The capacity of a state to implement decisions and policies effectively across its territory.

    • Authoritative Power: The capacity of a state to get citizens to comply with its directives.

    • Weak states lack both powers, often failing to maintain basic public order or enforce laws outside capital cities (e.g., Afghanistan).

  • Corruption: The misuse of public office for private gain by public officials, family, or political allies.

    • Creates a wide divergence between formal statutory rules and actual bureaucratic practice.

    • While rapid economic growth can occur alongside corruption in the short term (e.g., 19th-century United States, post-1980 China), sustained long-term development to high-income status requires low corruption levels.

  • Democracy: Low-income states often exhibit weak democratic institutions, electoral manipulation, and voter coercion by local elites.

Explanations for Development Disparities

  • Geography:

    • Jared Diamond (Guns, Germs, and Steel): Eurasia's east-west continental axis and native species of domesticable plants and large mammals enabled early agricultural surpluses, social stratification, specialized technology, and disease immunity.

    • Disadvantages persist for landlocked nations without navigable waterways, tropical disease zones (e.g., malaria endemicity), and countries with small internal markets.

    • Limitations: Fails to explain wide income divergence between geographically identical regions (e.g., South Korea vs. North Korea).

  • Culture:

    • Max Weber: The Protestant ethic emphasized disciplined work, thrift, punctuality, and reinvestment rather than consumption.

    • David Landes: Emphasizes diligence, rationality, and productivity.

    • Francis Fukuyama: Emphasizes generalized social trust as an essential lubricant for complex economic coordination.

    • Limitations: Cannot easily account for sudden shifts in economic performance (e.g., China's post-1978 expansion).

  • Colonialism:

    • European extraction of wealth, slave labor, and export commodities impoverished colonies (e.g., post-independence reparations imposed on Haiti by France).

    • Left legacies of single-commodity dependencies, arbitrary borders, and ethnic divisions.

    • Limitations: Fails to explain why some former colonies achieved high-income status (e.g., Canada, Singapore, South Korea) or why commodity windfalls did not automatically produce domestic development.

  • Institutions (Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson):

    • Inclusive Economic Institutions: Secure private property rights, universal legal protections, and open competitive markets that incentivize investment.

    • Inclusive Political Institutions: Broad distribution of political power, rule of law, and constitutional constraints on executive authority.

    • Extractive Institutions: Concentrate wealth and power in a narrow elite (e.g., Zimbabwe under Robert Mugabe).

    • Settler Mortality Hypothesis: Regions with high European settlement established inclusive institutions; regions with high mortality or plantation economies established extractive institutions.

  • Leadership: Strategic policy choices, institutional reforms, and coalition-building by state leaders (e.g., Park Chung Hee in South Korea, Paul Kagame in Rwanda).

Testing Per Capita Income Against Citizen Capabilities

  • Physical Well-Being (Infant Mortality):

    • Higher GDP per capita strongly correlates with lower infant mortality rates.

    • The effect plateaus at higher income levels, with low-income states exhibiting wide variation (e.g., Haiti having significantly lower infant mortality than Sierra Leone at similar per capita income levels).

  • Informed Decision-Making (Adult Literacy):

    • Higher per capita income corresponds to higher literacy.

    • Low-income nations can achieve universal literacy through targeted public policy (e.g., Armenia achieving 100%100\% adult literacy with a GDP per capita of $5,500\text{\$}5{,}500).

  • Safety (Homicide Rates):

    • Homicide rates generally decline with higher income levels.

    • Notable exceptions exist: the United States exhibits an elevated homicide rate relative to high-income peer nations; mid-income Latin American and Caribbean nations exhibit high variance (e.g., Venezuela, Jamaica).

  • Democracy:

    • Modest positive association between GDP per capita and democracy index scores.

    • Resource-rich autocracies (e.g., Qatar) remain significant outliers with high incomes and low democratic participation.