Evolutionary Psychology: Comparative Animal Cognition and the Human-Animal Divide

Introduction to Comparative Psychology and Animal Minds

  • This lecture, titled "Evolutionary Psychology - animal minds," is part of the Psych 109 course delivered by Lecturer Russell Gray.

  • Lecturer Background:     - Connections to New Zealand landmarks: Ko Whanganui te awa (The Whanganui is the river), Ko Mauao te maunga (Mauao is the mountain).     - Emphasizes the importance of scientific thinking in psychological research.

  • Learning Objectives:     - Explain the role and methods of comparative psychologists.     - Understand the necessity of experimental design to differentiate between various accounts of animal cognition.     - Distinguish between biological homology and evolutionary convergence.     - Identify the four essential requirements for natural selection to occur.     - Critically evaluate the broader ethical and philosophical implications of findings in animal cognition.

Evolutionary Context and the History of Life

  • Common Ancestry: Humans are related to every living organism that has ever existed on Earth. Life is categorized into three domains: Eukaryotes, Archaea, and Bacteria.

  • Timeline of Evolutionary Milestones (Millions of Years Ago):     - Earth Birth: Approximately 40004000 million years ago.     - Oceans Rust / Global Ice Ages: Occurred between 30003000 and 20002000 million years ago.     - Cambrian Explosion: Approximately 541541 million years ago.     - Mass Extinctions: Key events occurred at 444444, 370370, 252252, 201201, and 6666 million years ago.     - Specific Lineages: Evolution of Fish (500+500+ mya), Amphibians (370+370+ mya), Reptiles (300+300+ mya), Birds (150+150+ mya), and Mammals (200+200+ mya).

  • The Romantics vs. The Killjoys:     - Romantics: Argue that animals possess complex mental states such as causal reasoning, insight, theory of mind, mental time travel, empathy, cooperation, and "episodic-like" memory.     - Killjoys: Argue that complex behaviors can be explained more simply through basic principles of learning (e.g., conditioning) without invoking higher cognitive states.

Key Evolutionary Concepts

  • Comparative Psychology: The study of animal behavior and mental processes to learn more about the parts of our own minds that we share with animal cousins.

  • Homology: Structures that are shared because they were inherited from a common ancestor.     - Example: The Vertebrate Limb: The humerus, ulna, radius, carpal, metacarpal, and phalanges are found in humans, cats, whales, and bats.     - Example: Primate Brain Structure: Humans, Chimpanzees (Lulu), Bonobos (Jill), and Gorillas (Kekla) share common brain architecture, including the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, occipital lobe, and sylvian fissure.

  • Convergent Evolution: The independent evolution of similar structures or traits in different lineages where natural selection has favored the same outcome from different ancestors (Ancestor 1 and Ancestor 2 yield the same outcome).

  • The Four Requirements for Natural Selection:     1. Variation: Differences exist between individuals, often created by mutation.     2. Heritability: These variations must be capable of being passed down to offspring.     3. Design Differences: Variations must affect the "design" or functionality of the organism.     4. Competition: Differential survival and reproduction where unfavorable mutations are selected against and favorable mutations are more likely to survive and reproduce.

Tool Manufacture and Animal Intelligence

  • Historical Perspective: Louis Leakey once defined humans as "Man the tool maker," suggesting tool use was the defining characteristic of humanity.

  • Tool Use in Other Species:     - Observed in various primates (e.g., chimpanzees and baboons).     - New Caledonian Crows: Known for tool culture, specifically making pandanus-leaf tools. Research by Hunt & Gray (20032003, 20042004) published in Proc. Roy. Soc. B (270270, 867874867-874 / 271271, 889088-90) explores these capabilities.

  • Experimental Testing: Researchers use complex setups (e.g., multi-step puzzles shown in BBC videos) to test if animals like crows can plan ahead rather than just reacting to immediate stimuli.

Animal Communication and Language

  • The Human "Operating System": Yuval Noah Harari suggests language is the operating system of the human species, enabling mass cooperation and activism.

  • Language Learning in Chimpanzees:     - Gua and Viki: Common chimps raised by the Hayeses. Viki learned only 33-44 words: "mama," "papa," "up," and "cup."     - Anatomical Barriers: Chimpanzees have a different vocal tract structure than humans. Humans have a lower larynx and a specialized nasal cavity/velum arrangement that allows for a wide range of speech sounds; chimps do not.

  • Nim Chimpsky: Project Nim attempted to teach sign language to a chimp.     - Results showed no evidence of true grammar or syntax.     - typical utterances: "Nim eat Nim eat," "Banana me me me eat," "Give orange give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you."     - Utterances were often just drills or strings of actions/objects without linguistic structure.

  • Kanzi (Bonobo):     - Used lexigrams and a speech synthesizer. Considered truly symbolic.     - Learned approximately 100100 words but did not engage in human-like conversation.     - Understood action/object relationships but remained reactive rather than grasping the full functionality of language.

  • Scientific Consensus (Terrace et al., 1979): While apes can learn isolated symbols, they show no unequivocal mastering of conversational, semantic, or syntactic organization of language.

Cognitive Abilities: Statistical Reasoning

  • Language vs. Thought:     - Vygotsky: Language shapes thought; internalizing speech allows for complex cognition.     - Piaget: Language merely provides labels for experiences; it is not central to the development of thought.

  • Probabilistic Reasoning: The ability to make predictions based on the likelihood of different outcomes.

  • The Kea Study (Bastos & Taylor):     - Kea (Nestor notabilis) at the University of Auckland were tested on statistical inference.     - Token Value: Kea learned that black tokens resulted in food (rewarding), while orange tokens resulted in nothing (unrewarding).     - Experimental Condition: A Kea watched an experimenter place a hand into two jars. Jar 1 had 100100 black tokens and 2020 orange tokens (100:20100:20 ratio). Jar 2 had 2020 black and 100100 orange tokens (20:10020:100 ratio). Using a cardboard barrier to hide the specific token picked, the Kea had to choose the hand most likely to contain a black token.     - Findings: Kea show three signatures of domain-general statistical inference.

Broader Implications and Ethics

  • Animal Welfare: Does the discovery of complex thought in birds like the Kea change our moral obligations toward them?

  • The "Unbridgeable Gap": Steven Pinker in The Language Instinct argues that maintaining a sharp distinction between humans and animals serves a practical, though perhaps unethical, role.     - It allows humans to use, wear, and eat animals "without any disquieting tinges of guilt or regret."     - It rationalizes high rates of extinction (100100 species a day) by claiming those beings are "not like us."

  • Ethical Reflection: Pinker suggests that acknowledging connections to other species might lead to a more optimistic view of the human future, especially considering animals that refuse to profit from harming their fellows (e.g., certain macaques).