debate

social construct theory STRENGTHS
-instills a sense of civic duty among the individual in relation to society as a whole
-creates a sense of community instead of isolated instances of individuals under a single government or ruler

-it establishes basic, inalienable rules.

social construct theory
A philosophic ideal that addresses the origin of society,and provides a groundwork for the legitimacy and extent of governmental power.

social construct theory WEAKNESSES
-It gives the government too much power to make laws under the guise of protecting the public

  • Political authority cannot simply evolve or emerge from its parts.

utilitarianism STRENGTHS

  • emphasis on neutrality,
  • its ability to capture what fundamentally matters
  • Flexibility. It can be applied to any moral situation that requires guidance

utilitarianism WEAKNESSES
-society does not solely focus on happiness when making choices
-Outcomes are unpredictable when dealing with the future
-gives the wrong answers to moral questions.

deontology STRENGTHS
-doesn't require weighing the costs and benefits of a situation
-does not require a prediction of an actions consequence
-avoids subjectivity and uncertainty

deontology WEAKNESSES
-No consequences are considered
-motivated by pleasure
-No flexibility.

consequentialism
The morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences.

consequentialism WEAKNESSES

  • the intentions of the person doing the act are irrelevant
  • no one can know the future with certainty
  • the character of the person doing the act is irrelevant.

Warrant
a reason why a claim is true. Can be analytical or evidence based.

Framework
a structured and formalized argument with rationale, analysis and evidence explaining how the judge should weigh various arguments.

Stock Issues
Significance, Harms, Inherency, Topicality, and Solvency. Most debate circuits do not debate using this style anymore, and topicality and solvency are the only ones that are typically seen in all circuits.

Contention
A pre-written argument that supports the debaters' side of the resolution. these are a part of the case.

Bandwagon
a fallacy based on the assumption that the opinion of the majority is always valid:

Mastered (2)
You've been getting these terms right!

Select these 2
utilitarianism
generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good.

deontology
views actions as either right or wrong without any regard to contextual features.

Not studied (9)
You haven't studied these terms yet!

Select these 9
consequentialism STRENGTHS
-usefulness for practical application
-the relative ease of universal application
-provides clear and practical guidance.

Value Criterion/Standard
a metric by which impacts in the round are viewed and analyzed. Most often, these are rooted in philosophy and explains how a government or person should act, and why.

Rebuttal
a specific time in each debate designated for either side to refute the arguments made by their opponent.

False Dilemma
a logical fallacy that presents only two options or sides when there are many options or sides.

Impact
the reason why the argument matters/is important. Explains why the judge should be concerned with an issue.

Slippery Slope
a course of action is rejected because, with little or no evidence, one insists that it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end or ends.

Ad Hominem
attack an opponent's character or motives rather than answering the argument or claim.

Resolution
the subject of the debate.

Strawman Argument-
logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against the extreme version.