Power
Power
the capacity to affect the outcomes of oneself and others (Coleman & Tjosvold, 2000)
Influence = only affect outcomes (subjective); power = has intention to change outcomes
Bases of Power
Reward - positive or negative reinforcement
Coercive - positive or negative punishment
Legitimate - from a position or role
Referent - from identification and liking
Expert - based on skills and competencies
Information - rational arguments, facts, logic
it is the membersā perception of a group memberās power base that affects the behavior of members, not the actual resources
Constructive Power
power used to enhance group effectiveness (rather than reduce), to benefit the common good, and is encouraged or agreed upon by all members
outside of this definition ā destructive
Dynamic Interdependence
posits that who is influencing whom to what degree changes constantly as members strive to achieve the groupās goals
Depending on the issue ā whoās the expert about the current issue
Depending on the type of interdependence
seen to exist in relationships, not in individuals and to be almost always bidirectional
Competition
The Milgram study demonstrates how power can be used to get a person to do the bidding of another person, usually a person with authority
Power is the successful influence of one person over another whoās originally unwilling to perform, performs it
Power can have positive effects on the wielder, it can cause negative effects on group members. This includes:
Negative Effects
Rebellion
More conflict
Destructive obedience
Alienation
Psychological reactance
Cooperation
The cooperative context is usually met with less resistance because members are inducible
Inducibility increases coordination and helps the group members become more open to another memberās influence to promote the achievement of group goals
Power in Cooperation
Expandable
Something to be shared
Acting in a bidirectional way
Noncoercive
Asymmetrical
Based on expertise, competence, access to information
Trait Factor
Power and persuasion
Social dominance theory
Persuasion
Power as a trait
People are more likely to be influenced by individuals whom they perceive to be trustworthy, distribute resources fairly, and treat people with respect
Social Dominance Theory
Bases power on oneās ability to control resources
A social dominance hierarchy is created when members of a social group vary in their ability to acquire resources; Some are better at competing for resources than others, and so some are ranked higher than others
High power doesnāt equate to competence and expertise; might negatively affect group effectiveness
What does this mean for group performance?
Group Effectiveness
based on competence, expertise, and relevant information
undermined when power is not equally distributed among members; when the use of authority dominates and expertise and information bases of power are ignored
High-Power and Low-Power Members
High-Power Members
Positive
initiative, positive emotions, increased self-esteem, motivation, and resistance to conformity pressures
Negative
happy with the status quo, dominate low-power individuals, believe rules do not apply to them, entitled, can and do break rules and laws
when threatened, reject initiatives from low-power members
legitimize their own privileges and intimidate low-power individuals, have an inflated sense of self-esteem, and devalue low-power individuals
Low-Power Members
cooperate, comply, and yield
attribute the group success to their own efforts (i.e. self-serving attribution)
resistance, psychological reactance, and obstruction
negatively evaluate high-power individuals
Mobilizing Power to Achieve Goals
Determine your goals
Assess your relevant resources
Determine what other resources you need to achieve your goals and who has these resources
Negotiate an agreement to mutually support one anotherās successful goal achievement
Carry out the activities necessary to achieve membersā and the groupās goals
INDIRECT WAYS
Conformity
a change in oneās actions, emotions, judgments, etc. that reduces the discrepancy with those of others; can either be compliance or private acceptance
Extreme Group Influence
Bystander effect (diffusion of responsibility)
Group polarization
Deindividuation
In summary, groups are most powerful when power is equally distributed among its members and is based on information and expertise. Otherwise, low-power members need to engage in specific behaviors to cooperate with high-power members.