Study Notes on Exam Prep and Utilitarianism

Exam Schedule and Preparation

  • Initial date for the exam was set for the third but has been changed to the fifth (Thursday).
  • Review day is scheduled after the completion of content on utilitarianism.
  • Last content to be discussed is utilitarianism, then a review session on the following Tuesday.
  • Students should come prepared with questions for the review session.

Exam Structure and Expectations

  • No unexpected items on the exam; students should know exactly what to expect.
  • Students advised to review the list of questions provided beforehand.
  • Suggested study strategy: Prepare answers to all questions and choose a minimum of five to ten questions to focus on.
  • Essay portion: Students will select two of the five given topics and write 3-4 pages on each.
  • Time management suggested:
    • Five to ten minutes for simple definitions.
    • Rest of the time divided in half for essay questions.

Essay Guidelines

  • Assessing the length by word count can vary significantly between individuals.
  • Average word count for typed responses reported to be between 500 to 700 words from students utilizing the SAS service.

Answering Techniques on Exam

  • Emphasis on answering all sub-questions thoroughly.
  • Preferred writing instruments: No strict preference, but pencils allow for easier corrections.
  • Questions regarding midterms: The exam is after the break due to scheduling changes.
  • Spelling and grammar addressed; major focus on legibility rather than perfection.

Preparation Tips

  • Understand key terminology and jargon.
  • Advice on writing: Use spaces effectively and develop a flowchart for organizing answers.
  • Utilize outline-style responses to ensure clarity and coherence.

Introduction to Utilitarianism

  • Week dedicated to studying utilitarianism.
  • Important philosophers discussed:
    • Jeremy Bentham: 18th-century philosopher, associated with utilitarian ethics.
    • John Stuart Mill: Known for his contributions in the 19th century, improves upon Bentham's ideas.

Modernization and Empiricism

  • Utilitarianism as part of the modernization movement.
  • Shift away from supernatural explanations to scientific understandings.
  • Empiricism defined: Knowledge derived from sensory experience.
  • Exclusions of the metaphysical and a priori concepts from empirical understanding.

Empirical Basis of Moral Principles

  • The philosophical shift towards a naturalistic view of goodness; away from supernatural reasoning.
  • David Hume's arguments on morality revolve around human sentiments and feelings.
  • Bentham's distinction between feelings (sympathy, antipathy) and measurable pleasure.
  • The question of what constitutes 'pleasure' remains central to the analysis of utilitarianism.

Bentham vs. Mill on Pleasure

  • Bentham: All pleasures are equivalent, emphasizing desire satisfaction.
  • Mill: Differentiates between higher (intellectual) and lower (bodily) pleasures, prioritizes the former.

Historical Context of Utilitarianism

  • Utilitarianism emerged as a significant ethical theory during the 19th century.
  • Bentham's social reform advocacy spanned various systems including justice, education, and government.
  • Notable contributions to penal reform emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.

Utilitarian Calculus and Implications

  • The principle that actions should maximize utility for the greatest number.
  • Utilitarianism challenges traditional views of morality centered around rights.
  • Bentham's assertion: Rights are "nonsense on stilts" compared to the overall happiness.

Quantification Challenges

  • Issues with measuring pleasure and weighing its importance among individuals.
  • The concept of “utility monster” – critiques the uneven distribution of pleasure.

Conclusion: Ethical Implications

  • Utilitarianism raises questions about moral responsibilities and individual rights versus collective happiness.
  • The egalitarian nature of utilitarianism stands against traditional hierarchical moral views.
  • Recommendations for future study emphasize comparability of pleasure and ethical decision-making.