Psych - responsibility

Responsibility

IB Definition

Psychologists rely on humans as participants in their research; the relationship between researchers and participants is based on the premise of treating each other with respect. As researchers, therapists or government advisers, for example, psychologists can have positions of power and should act with social responsibility. In the use of animal participants, researchers should attempt to reduce the number of animals used, refine the conditions of the research in order to minimize harm and always attempt to replace animals with alternatives.



Ethical principles guide psychologists, and those studying psychology, to make reasoned and responsible decisions to ensure that benefits are maximized and costs are minimized. Ethical standards can also affect the results of research. Informed consent can introduce participant variables, the right to withdraw can lead to sampling biases, and anonymity can increase the validity of self-reported data.






Ethical principle

description

Special situations

Effects on research

Informed consent

Participants must be fully informed about the nature, purpose, and potential risks of the study before agreeing to participate. 



Must be voluntary without coercion

- children or indiv.s with cognitive impairments (--> consent by proxy or assent by children)

- may be impossible in field studies or covert observations (ethical dilemma, retrospective information)

- Self-selection bias

- Increased likelihood of demand characteristics

anonymity

Participants’ identities are not recorded or connected to their data, ensuring the protection of privacy

- longitudinal studies (but can be separated in results)

- can be indirectly identified in small or specialized populations 

Pos:

Helps increase honesty (reduce social desirability bias), especially in sensitive research



Hard to follow up or verify information

Right to withdraw

Participants must be informed that they can withdraw from participation at any time without penalty or negative consequences

- When paid: allowed to keep compensation.

- group studies: one withdrawal → poss. Group impacts (ex. focus groups)

- in case of compensation, it must not result in pressure to stay

Must be a part of planning - sample size and attrition bias (selective dropout of participants from a certain group → ↓validity)

Deception

- deliberately misleading (commission) or withholding information from participants (omission) about the true purpose of the study

- must be justified to an ethics board

- must be revealed in the debriefing 

Sometimes necessary (ex. Placebo or studies of behavior)

Pro: can reduce bias + improve ecological validity



Risk: may increase risk of them withdrawing their data 

Protection from undue stress or harm

Ensure that participants are not exposed to physical or psychological harm greater then what they might be encountered in everyday life

- all research must be approved by an ethics board

- emotional ot traumatic topics may trigger participants even if not obvious to researchers

- when working with vulnerable populations (ex. PTSD sufferers) → extra caution

May limit the kinds of questions + procedures researchers can ethically use

debriefing

After the study, participants must be fully informed about the true purpose, any deception used, and allowed to ask questions.

- longitudinal/ with follow-ups → delayed debriefings

- if it reveals sensitive content, support resources should be provided

- Helps maintain trust

- Helps repair potential harm from deception