17

Criminal Trial and Due Process
  • Criminal Trial Definition: A procedure for determining if a criminal defendant’s constitutional rights are upheld before incarceration is imposed.

  • Due Process Clause: Ensures that the government must follow fair procedures when depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property.

Types of Due Process
  • Procedural Due Process:

    • Refers to the methods and procedures that must be followed to ensure fairness before rights can be taken away.
    • Requires a neutral decision-maker to determine if the deprivation is justified.
  • Substantive Due Process:

    • Addresses the underlying rights themselves, focusing on the substance of laws that restrict these rights.
    • Questions whether the government has a constitutionally valid reason for infringing on a right.
Diagram of Analysis
  • Difference Between Substantive Due Process and Equal Protection:
    • Substantive Due Process pertains to rights taken away.
    • Equal Protection focuses on treatment of similarly situated individuals.
Rights Analysis
  • Nature of Rights Taken: Understand if the right is a fundamental right.
  • If rights are fundamental, courts apply the strict scrutiny test.
  • If rights are not fundamental, the rational basis test applies.
Tests for Rights Restriction
  • Strict Scrutiny Test:

    • The government must prove that the restriction is necessary for a compelling government interest.
    • It’s a high standard for the government to meet.
  • Rational Basis Test:

    • The government only needs to show that the law is rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
    • This test is less stringent and typically easier for the government to satisfy.
Example Scenarios
  • Voting Restriction Example:

    • Georgia law requiring a bachelor’s degree to vote is substantively due process concern.
    • Voting is a fundamental right, hence applying strict scrutiny:
    • The government’s argument about an educated voting public is compelling but not necessary, as many educated individuals exist without degrees.
    • Conclusion: This law likely fails strict scrutiny.
  • License Tag Example:

    • Georgia law requiring license tags is generally applicable, but driving is not viewed as a fundamental right.
    • Thus, the rational basis test applies, leading to likely constitutionality as the law is rationally related to public safety.
Equal Protection Clause
  • Equal Protection Clause: Located in the 14th Amendment, it mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally.
  • Levels of Scrutiny:
    • Strict Scrutiny: for race classifications (hard for government to justify).
    • Intermediate Scrutiny: for gender classifications (allows for some differentiated treatment).
    • Rational Basis: for classifications based on non-suspect categories (e.g., age, wealth).
Privacy Rights
  • Emergence of Privacy Rights: Not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but recognized in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) focusing on contraceptive rights for married couples.
  • Expansive Interpretation: Privacy has been inferred through various amendments' penumbras.
  • Changes in Privacy Recognition: Roe v. Wade established abortion rights under privacy, but recent changes may challenge existing interpretations.
Practice Analysis Discussion
  • Encouragement to engage in challenges based on established rights and tests.
  • Explore recent cases, like those concerning gender and race, applying strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny where relevant.
Conclusion
  • Ongoing discussion about the balance of rights, governmental overreach, and evolving interpretations of constitutional protections.