12. Equality at Work
Lecture Overview
Topic: Equality at Work
Course: Labour Law 2025
Lecturer: Dr. Vera Pavlou
Intended Learning Outcomes
Outline the different protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.
Explain key concepts:
Direct discrimination
Indirect discrimination
Harassment
Victimisation
Discrimination arising from disability
Reasonable adjustments
Positive action
Describe the main exceptions in the Equality Act (EA) to the prohibition of discrimination in employment.
Explain the scope for employers to take positive action.
Outline key aspects of enforcement of complaints and the applicable remedies.
Apply legal principles to different factual scenarios.
Overview of Lecture Content
Historical and current legislation.
Coverage and application of laws.
Protected characteristics under the law.
Prohibited conduct including:
Discrimination
Harassment
Victimisation
Exceptions to the rules.
Positive action strategies.
Procedure for complaints and remedies available.
Historical Legislation
Equal Pay Act 1970: Aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on gender.
Sex Discrimination Act 1975: Provides protection against discrimination based on sex.
Race Relations Act 1976: Addresses discrimination based on race.
Disability Discrimination Act 1995: Protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination.
Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003: Covers discrimination based on religion or belief.
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003: Protects against discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006: Addresses age-related discrimination.
Current Legislation
Equality Act 2010:
Purpose: Reform and harmonize equality law; consolidate previous enactments related to discrimination and harassment based on personal characteristics.
Key Parts:
Part 2: Equality concepts
Part 5: Work regulations
Part 8: Prohibited conduct
Part 9: Enforcement procedures
Schedules: Specific details and exceptions.
Coverage of Employment
Defined in s83(2)(a) of the EA as:
Employment under a contract of employment
Contract of apprenticeship
Contract personally to do work.
Case Reference: Jivraj v Hashwani highlights the requirement for subordination, limiting the scope of application.
Critique of Coverage: Includes discussions on various roles like contract workers, partners, and apprentices in law.
Application of Discrimination and Harassment
Discrimination/Victimisation in Recruitment (s39):
Addressing selection and terms.
During Employment (s39):
Focus on terms, promotion, training, and benefits.
Harassment (s40):
Includes conduct that undermines employee dignity.
Post-Employment Issues (s108):
Discrimination or harassment after employment ends.
Case Reference: Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd.
Protected Characteristics (s4)
List of Characteristics:
Age
Disability
Gender reassignment
Marriage and civil partnership
Pregnancy and maternity
Race
Religion or belief
Sex
Sexual orientation.
Concepts of Discrimination
Direct Discrimination (s13):
Definition: A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others.
Key Legal Principles:
The ‘but for’ test applies (James v Eastleigh Borough Council; Shamoon v RUC).
Motivation is irrelevant (European Roma Rights Centre case).
Discrimination by association (EBR Attridge Law LLP v Coleman).
Wide interpretation of ‘less favourably’ (Birmingham City Council case).
Justifications provided for age-related discrimination must meet specific criteria.
Indirect Discrimination (s19)
Definition: Application of a provision, criterion, or practice (PCP) that:
Applies to persons not sharing the protected characteristic.
Puts or would put those sharing the characteristic at a disadvantage.
Should not be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Case Reference: Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice highlights the disadvantage.
Justification Test: Homer v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police outlines case-specific requirements.
New introduction of s19A emphasizes the need for same disadvantage in case considerations.
Prohibited Conduct Related to Disability (s15)
Definition: Unfavourable treatment due to something arising from disability unless justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments (ss20-22):
Triggers include PCP, physical environment, and auxiliary aids, aiming to alleviate substantial disadvantage.
Harassment (s26)
Definition: Engaging in unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic that violates the worker's dignity or creates an intimidating/humiliating environment.
Case Reference: English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds, emphasizes the need for both subjective and objective assessments of the effect.
Employer's Duty: Reasonable steps must be taken to prevent harassment, especially sexual harassment (s40A).
Victimisation (s27)
Definition: Detriment because of a protected act, which could include bringing proceedings or providing evidence under the EA.
Causal Link: Essential to connect protected act and detrimental outcome.
Case Reference: Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan consolidates understanding in relevant precedence.
Exercises on Key Concepts
Identify scenarios as examples of:
Direct discrimination
Indirect discrimination
Harassment
Victimisation
Scenarios:
Job advert requiring specific experience.
Promotion denial due to tribunal evidence.
Racist remarks in a team setting.
Prohibition of partner's attendance at a function after gender reassignment.
Exceptions to Prohibition of Discrimination
Occupational Requirements (Schedule 9, para 1): Allows for exceptions under specific occupational roles.
Additional exceptions include:
Organised religion (Schedule 9, para 2)
Religious ethos employers (Schedule 9, para 3)
Armed forces (Schedule 9, para 4).
Positive Action (s158)
Definition: Employers can take actions if they believe a group is disadvantaged, driving efforts to alleviate disadvantages or meet specific participation needs.
Positive Action in Recruitment (s159)
Employers may consider protected characteristics during recruitment and promotions if it is a proportional response to overcome disadvantage or increase participation, but only in tie-break scenarios.
Complaints Process
Time Limits (s123): Standard limit is 3 months for lodging complaints but can be extended under fair conditions.
Burden of Proof (s136):
Claimant must prove a prima facie case of discrimination.
Respondent must then prove non-discrimination.
Follows two-stage approach as in Igen v Wong.
Vicarious Liability in Complaints (s109)
Definition: Liable for actions taken in the course of employment; includes precedents like Jones v Tower Boot.
Defence available if reasonable steps were taken to prevent discrimination (s109(4)).
Remedies Available (s124)
Forms of Compensation:
Includes injury to feelings assessments as per guideline cases (Vento v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police) and further instructions from ET Presidents in relevant jurisdictions.
The case of Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice highlights the concept of "disadvantage" within the definition of indirect discrimination. This refers to a provision, criterion, or practice (PCP) that, when applied, puts those sharing a protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage compared to others.