Critiques of units

(Eco)Modernism

  1. Modern-Rational Plan

    • Political Challenges: Difficulty in agreeing on goals due to differing political views.

    • Context-Specific Interventions: Interventions are specific to the context and situation, not universally applicable.

    • Wicked Problems in Planning: Issues like no definitive problem formulation, endless planning process, value judgments, untestable solutions, risks, ideological nature, uniqueness, interdependence, and the need for ethical and political accountability.

  2. Eco-Modernism and Rational Planning Process

    • Political Challenge: Nearly impossible to agree on goals.

    • Context-Specific Capacity: Intervention capacity and conditions are context-specific and not guaranteed.

  3. Incrementalism

    • Conservative: Radical change is not possible.

    • Managerial: Decisions reflect interests in the policy area, not the people with "no voice."

    • Urgency: Difficult for fast change.

  4. Strategic Planning

    • Power Structures: No change in power structures.

    • Lobby Influence: Prone to influence from lobbyists and non-public experts.

    • Modern View: Rooted in a modernist perspective, assuming a positive sum game.

Strategy

  1. Strategic Planning

    • Power Structures: Often fails to change existing power structures.

    • Lobby Influence: Can be influenced by lobbyists and non-public experts.

    • Implementation Challenges: Difficulty in achieving meaningful change and potential for plans to become outdated or irrelevant.

Institutions

  1. Planning as Institutional Action

    • Legitimacy vs. Authoritarianism: Legitimacy is not the same as the absence of dissent; dissent can be suppressed by force or lack of information.

  2. Limits of Institutionalism

    • Instrumentalism: Avoid using regulations as plans.

    • Democracy: Maintain the link between regulations and politics.

    • Justice: Reflect on the political consequences of regulations.

  3. Challenges in Creating Regulations

    • Path Dependency: Institutions have historical roots and are not quickly adaptive.

    • Planning Paradox: Balancing certainty and flexibility in regulations.

(Post)Politics

  1. Critique of (Post)Politics

    • Exclusion: Who is excluded from the decision-making process?

    • Goals of Participation: What are the goals of participation, and why are they set?

    • Systemic Questioning: Justice should be a prerequisite rather than a solution.

(De)Growth

  1. Contradictory Role of Spatial Planning

    • Growth Promotion: More offices, jobs, mobility, visitors, and houses.

    • Challenges: Global ecological footprint of green cities, sacrifice zones of sustainable urbanization, and low-carbon gentrification.

  2. Challenges in (De)Growth Planning

    • Instrumentalism: Avoid using regulations as plans.

    • Democracy: Maintain the link between regulations and politics.

    • Justice: Reflect on the political consequences of regulations.

    • Regulation Dilemma: Too strict regulations limit autonomy; too open regulations become ineffective.

    • Intervention Dilemma: Too specific interventions exclude vision and systemic change; too broad interventions homogenize complexity.

Communication

  1. Critiques of Communicative Planning

    • Power Imbalances: Collaborative planning can be hindered by power imbalances among stakeholders.

    • Conflicting Interests: Diverse stakeholders may have conflicting interests and priorities.

    • Process vs. Outcomes: Emphasis on the process can overshadow the importance of tangible outcomes.

Participation

  1. Challenges in Participatory Planning

    • Power Imbalances: Participatory processes can be dominated by more affluent and educated groups.

    • Tokenism: Participation can be superficial, with citizens having little real influence.

    • Misrecognition: Certain groups and individuals can be ignored or marginalized.

Conflict

  1. Understanding Conflict in Planning

    • NIMBYism: Local opposition driven by concerns about property values, environmental impacts, and community character.

    • Agonistic Pluralism: Recognizes conflict as inherent and potentially productive.

    • Conflict Analysis: Identifying sources and dynamics of conflicts is essential for effective management.

Exclusion

  1. Challenges in Addressing Exclusion

    • Power Imbalances: Planning processes often reflect the interests of powerful groups.

    • Legal and Institutional Barriers: Legal norms and institutional practices can perpetuate exclusion.

    • Cultural Sensitivity: Recognizing and valuing diverse cultural identities and practices.

Futures

  1. Politics of Future Planning

    • Power Imbalances: The power to produce and present futures is unevenly distributed.

    • Invisible Futures: Some futures may remain invisible due to power imbalances and exclusionary practices.

Complexity

  1. Challenges in Complexity Planning

    • Self-Governance vs. Self-Organisation: Balancing intentional and coordinated efforts with spontaneous emergence.

    • Adaptability and Emergence: Recognizing the dynamic and non-linear nature of urban systems.

Punctual Urbanisms

  1. Challenges and Critiques

    • Legitimacy and Accountability: Punctual urbanisms can lack formal legitimacy and accountability.

    • Privileged Access: Bottom-up urbanism can sometimes privilege certain groups.

    • Exclusionary Aesthetics: Some interventions may reflect the values and preferences of specific groups.

Experimentation

  1. Challenges and Critiques

    • Legitimacy and Accountability: Temporary interventions can lack formal legitimacy and accountability.

    • Privileged Access: Experimentation can sometimes privilege certain groups.

    • Exclusionary Aesthetics: Some interventions may reflect the values and preferences of specific groups

In Gordon C. C. Douglas's 2019 work, "Privilege and Participation: On the Democratic Implications and Social Contradictions of Bottom-Up Urbanisms," several critiques of DIY urbanism are highlighted:

  1. Social Inequality: Douglas argues that DIY urbanism often reflects and reinforces existing social inequalities. The people who have the resources, time, and social capital to engage in these activities are typically more privileged, which can lead to unequal participation and benefits

    1

    .

  2. Democratic Limitations: While DIY urbanism is often seen as a democratizing force, Douglas points out that it can sometimes exclude marginalized groups. The interventions may not always represent the broader community's needs and values, leading to a form of participatory citizenship that is not truly inclusive

    1

    .

  3. Contradictions of Neoliberalism: The phenomenon embodies many contradictions of the neoliberal city. DIY urbanism can be seen as a response to the failures of formal urban planning and governance, yet it also operates within and sometimes reinforces the same neoliberal frameworks that contribute to urban inequalities

    1

    .

  4. Legitimacy and Authority: There is a tension between unauthorized and authorized interventions. Unauthorized acts can be seen as illegitimate or even illegal, while authorized ones might lose their grassroots appeal and become co-opted by formal institutions

    1

    .