Lecture 4 - Motor development

PSYC205 Week 2: Lecture 4 - Motor Development


Learning Objectives

  • Understand the stage view of motor development

  • Grasp the basic tenets of dynamic systems theory in motor development

  • Explore links between motor and social development within the broader context of developmental processes


Motor Development Perspectives

  • Stage View (Descriptive viewpoint: What)

    • Biological changes enable behavioral changes

    • Motor behaviors are sequenced and ranked

    • Correlation between mean age of skill attainment and specific motor skills

    • Evidence of similar developmental milestones across cultures (Ulrich, 1991)

  • Process View (Explanatory viewpoint: How)

    • Focuses on real-time adaptations and interactions


Stage View of Motor Development

  • Characteristics:

    • Progresses from simple to complex

    • Sequential and orderly

    • Builds upon fundamental skills

    • Not all infants follow the same path (e.g., 20% skip crawling)

  • Developmental Milestones:

    • Cephalo-Caudal Development: Control from head to tail

      (e.g., lift head → sit → walk)

    • Proximal-Distal Development: Control from central to

      peripheral

    • control of shoulders before wrists before fingers

      (e.g., bat at object → directed reach → grasp)


Stability of Developmental Milestones

  • Developmental charts are reliable for assessing early childhood development

  • No significant changes were observed between the 1970s and 2018 for 0-36 month-olds

  • Importance of cultural sensitivity in defining normative development


Criticism of the Stage View

  • Questions about what drives change

  • Discontinuities in performance and regressions in motor development

  • Relevance of milestones to long-term motor and social development


Dynamic Systems Theory

  • Focuses on the "how" rather than the "what"

  • Maturation systems are the foundation

  • Skills are reorganizations of existing abilities

  • Movement is soft-assembled and emergent

  • Reorganisation occurs as new and more effective ways of exploring are sought

  • Interaction between individual, environment, experience, and maturation leads to affordances or constraints

  • There is an interaction between biological changes and experiences


Example: Walking

  • Stage View: Development of motor cortex and motor program

  • Dynamic Systems View: All systems (emotional, motivational, anatomical) must be ready


Links Between Motor, Cognitive, and Social Development

  • Onset of Locomotion:

    • Onset of crawling creates new challenges for infants and parents

    • Encourages exploration and autonomy

    • Dramatic changes in social signals received and initiated by infants

    • Discourage and prohibit

    • '‘psychological birth of the infant human”

  • Changes in Family Dynamics:

    • Tug of war between infant willfulness and parental compliance

    • New forms of affection emerge like peek a boo games

  • Changes in the Infant:

    • Increased affection towards primary caregivers

    • Greater sensitivity to maternal presence and maternal location

    • Onset of temper tantrums and social referencing

    • Increased attendance to distal events, parts of the environment/object not immediately near by

  • Changes in the Parent:

    • Expectation of compliance from infants, feel that infants are now responsible for their actions

    • Increased verbal prohibitions and expressions of anger

    • Using distaction to move infants from potential dangerous sitations

    • New affectionate behaviour including more hugs/cuddles


Locomotion, Attachment, and Social Interaction

  • New attachment behaviours emerge, such as proximity-seeking

  • Carrying objects; approach caregivers to share joint attention or initiate information seeking

  • Infants who engage in joint attention are more likely to walk earlier


Infant’s View of the World

  • Shift from focusing on faces to hands and objects

  • Infants create a curriculum for statistical learning


Visual Cliff Paradigm

  • Examines the relationship between fear of heights and social/motor development

  • no fear of heights in babies


Effects on Exploration and Language Development

  • Organized exploration sequence influences visual and haptic behaviors

  • Visual exploration prompted gait modifications and hapctic explorations

  • Milestones in motor development correlate with language development (e.g., sitting → babbling)

    • ability to sit with support -> produce consonant like sounds at 20 weeks

    • ability to sit independently -> first production of babbling at around 6 months through exploration of own vocal tract

    • self locomotion -> first word

  • Early walkers are usually early talkers: have greater opportunity to explore the environment, to discover and manipulate new objects and to elicit new words from caregivers as a result (Oudgeneog- Paz et al., 2012, 2013).

  • Infants’ experience of sitting unaided and exploring objects visually and manually predicted their ability to mentally rotate 3D objects (Sosk


Later Cognitive and Social Outcomes

  • 9 -month-old infants’ sustained attention to objects held was predictive of vocabulary at 12 and 15 mo (Yu, Suanda, & Smith, 2019)

  • Active and efficient manual exploration at 5 mo correlated with academic achievement as late as 14 years of age (Bornstein, Hahn, & Suwalsky, 2013; Muentene, Herrig, & Schuz, 2018)

  • Fine motor and social interaction skills moderated prosocial understanding and behaviour at 16 mo (Koster et al., 2019)

  • Motor skills (oral motor control) associated with language production at 21



"4E" View of Motor Development

  • Embodied: Interaction with physical forces

    • Forces act on the body: gravity, friction forces, ground reaction force

    • Forces generated by the body: propulsive force and torques

    • Novice infant walker with short, irregularly spaced steps and the feet wide apart

    • Experienced infant walker with longer, narrower, more regularly spaced steps

  • Embedded: Influenced by environmental affordances

    • Embedded in the perceived affordances of the environment, e.g., a steep slope

    • Footprints show characteristic gait modifications in an experienced infant walker while approaching and descending a shallow 6◦ slope and a steep 24◦ slope

  • Enculturated: Affected by socio-cultural practices

    • Footprints show the characteristic walking patterns of an infant (black) and caregiver (blue) during free play

    • Can be hindered or facilitated by socio-cultural practices

  • Enabling: Movement creates new developmental opportunities

    • Movement enables new developments

    • As average field of view for crawling and walking infants changes, new possibilities arise – unless the infant turns head and looks, dog, train, mother’s face, window, crib is not in view



Conclusions

  • Motor development is integral to developmental psychology

  • Traditionally viewed as stages, now understood through dynamic interactions

  • Significant impact on social processing and later development

  • Emphasizes interplay between social, motor, and semantic systems


Core Readings

  • Chapter 3 of the handbook

  • Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 141-164.

  • Campos, J. J., et al. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy, 1(2), 149-219.

  • Spencer, J. P., et al. (2011). A dynamic systems revolution in motor and cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 260-266.

  • Thelen, E. (2000). Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(4), 385-397.