Lecture 4 - Motor development
PSYC205 Week 2: Lecture 4 - Motor Development
Learning Objectives
Understand the stage view of motor development
Grasp the basic tenets of dynamic systems theory in motor development
Explore links between motor and social development within the broader context of developmental processes
Motor Development Perspectives
Stage View (Descriptive viewpoint: What)
Biological changes enable behavioral changes
Motor behaviors are sequenced and ranked
Correlation between mean age of skill attainment and specific motor skills
Evidence of similar developmental milestones across cultures (Ulrich, 1991)
Process View (Explanatory viewpoint: How)
Focuses on real-time adaptations and interactions
Stage View of Motor Development
Characteristics:
Progresses from simple to complex
Sequential and orderly
Builds upon fundamental skills
Not all infants follow the same path (e.g., 20% skip crawling)
Developmental Milestones:
Cephalo-Caudal Development: Control from head to tail
(e.g., lift head → sit → walk)
Proximal-Distal Development: Control from central to
peripheral
control of shoulders before wrists before fingers
(e.g., bat at object → directed reach → grasp)
Stability of Developmental Milestones
Developmental charts are reliable for assessing early childhood development
No significant changes were observed between the 1970s and 2018 for 0-36 month-olds
Importance of cultural sensitivity in defining normative development
Criticism of the Stage View
Questions about what drives change
Discontinuities in performance and regressions in motor development
Relevance of milestones to long-term motor and social development
Dynamic Systems Theory
Focuses on the "how" rather than the "what"
Maturation systems are the foundation
Skills are reorganizations of existing abilities
Movement is soft-assembled and emergent
Reorganisation occurs as new and more effective ways of exploring are sought
Interaction between individual, environment, experience, and maturation leads to affordances or constraints
There is an interaction between biological changes and experiences
Example: Walking
Stage View: Development of motor cortex and motor program
Dynamic Systems View: All systems (emotional, motivational, anatomical) must be ready
Links Between Motor, Cognitive, and Social Development
Onset of Locomotion:
Onset of crawling creates new challenges for infants and parents
Encourages exploration and autonomy
Dramatic changes in social signals received and initiated by infants
Discourage and prohibit
'‘psychological birth of the infant human”
Changes in Family Dynamics:
Tug of war between infant willfulness and parental compliance
New forms of affection emerge like peek a boo games
Changes in the Infant:
Increased affection towards primary caregivers
Greater sensitivity to maternal presence and maternal location
Onset of temper tantrums and social referencing
Increased attendance to distal events, parts of the environment/object not immediately near by
Changes in the Parent:
Expectation of compliance from infants, feel that infants are now responsible for their actions
Increased verbal prohibitions and expressions of anger
Using distaction to move infants from potential dangerous sitations
New affectionate behaviour including more hugs/cuddles
Locomotion, Attachment, and Social Interaction
New attachment behaviours emerge, such as proximity-seeking
Carrying objects; approach caregivers to share joint attention or initiate information seeking
Infants who engage in joint attention are more likely to walk earlier
Infant’s View of the World
Shift from focusing on faces to hands and objects
Infants create a curriculum for statistical learning
Visual Cliff Paradigm
Examines the relationship between fear of heights and social/motor development
no fear of heights in babies
Effects on Exploration and Language Development
Organized exploration sequence influences visual and haptic behaviors
Visual exploration prompted gait modifications and hapctic explorations
Milestones in motor development correlate with language development (e.g., sitting → babbling)
ability to sit with support -> produce consonant like sounds at 20 weeks
ability to sit independently -> first production of babbling at around 6 months through exploration of own vocal tract
self locomotion -> first word
Early walkers are usually early talkers: have greater opportunity to explore the environment, to discover and manipulate new objects and to elicit new words from caregivers as a result (Oudgeneog- Paz et al., 2012, 2013).
Infants’ experience of sitting unaided and exploring objects visually and manually predicted their ability to mentally rotate 3D objects (Sosk
Later Cognitive and Social Outcomes
9 -month-old infants’ sustained attention to objects held was predictive of vocabulary at 12 and 15 mo (Yu, Suanda, & Smith, 2019)
Active and efficient manual exploration at 5 mo correlated with academic achievement as late as 14 years of age (Bornstein, Hahn, & Suwalsky, 2013; Muentene, Herrig, & Schuz, 2018)
Fine motor and social interaction skills moderated prosocial understanding and behaviour at 16 mo (Koster et al., 2019)
Motor skills (oral motor control) associated with language production at 21
"4E" View of Motor Development
Embodied: Interaction with physical forces
Forces act on the body: gravity, friction forces, ground reaction force
Forces generated by the body: propulsive force and torques
Novice infant walker with short, irregularly spaced steps and the feet wide apart
Experienced infant walker with longer, narrower, more regularly spaced steps
Embedded: Influenced by environmental affordances
Embedded in the perceived affordances of the environment, e.g., a steep slope
Footprints show characteristic gait modifications in an experienced infant walker while approaching and descending a shallow 6◦ slope and a steep 24◦ slope
Enculturated: Affected by socio-cultural practices
Footprints show the characteristic walking patterns of an infant (black) and caregiver (blue) during free play
Can be hindered or facilitated by socio-cultural practices
Enabling: Movement creates new developmental opportunities
Movement enables new developments
As average field of view for crawling and walking infants changes, new possibilities arise – unless the infant turns head and looks, dog, train, mother’s face, window, crib is not in view
Conclusions
Motor development is integral to developmental psychology
Traditionally viewed as stages, now understood through dynamic interactions
Significant impact on social processing and later development
Emphasizes interplay between social, motor, and semantic systems
Core Readings
Chapter 3 of the handbook
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 141-164.
Campos, J. J., et al. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy, 1(2), 149-219.
Spencer, J. P., et al. (2011). A dynamic systems revolution in motor and cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 260-266.
Thelen, E. (2000). Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(4), 385-397.