Study Notes on Testing Procedures and Scoring
Clarifications on Test Reversals
Understanding reversals in testing procedures.
If starting at a certain item (e.g., item eight) and an answer is incorrect:
Must the examinee go back to correct previous items?
Answer: Yes.
Must get the immediate previous item correct (e.g., item seven) in order to continue.
Once basal (the highest point reached before an error) is achieved, the testing can proceed back down.
Record Form Details
Importance of accurately filling record forms during assessments.
Required items:
Name of administrator
Examinee's name
Start time of the assessment.
Ensure the correct form is utilized, particularly for certain assessments such as vocabulary tasks.
Scoring Process Overview
Guide on scoring based on given age and item completion.
Example Score: 12 years, 1 month.
Specific to "block design" testing:
If score = 42, refer to scoring tables to find the corresponding scale score (e.g., scale score = 13).
Breakdown of additional sample scores provided:
Scores referenced: 42, 39, 25, 34, 82, and others.
Graphing and Composite Scores
Instructions for graphing scores:
Fill in specified graphs with derived scores.
Example discussion regarding scores rated as high averages vs. below-average scores.
Data Management and Statistical Calculations
Discussion on data management with respect to statistical analysis:
Importance of maintaining accurate statistics and scales throughout testing data collection.
Calculation of composite scores from summed index scores.
To find the MIS (Mean Index Score):
Calculation: Sum of five index scores divided by five.
Normative and Personal Strengths/Weaknesses
Definitions and differentiation of normative vs. personal strengths and weaknesses:
Normative strengths/weaknesses refer to how a test subject compares to a normative population.
Personal strengths/weaknesses refer to comparisons against an individual’s own performance.
Discussion of scoring context, where a one standard deviation is defined as 15 points from the mean.
Best Rates and Critical Values in Scoring
Finding best rates for strengths or weaknesses based on statistical significance.
Confirm whether scores higher than the critical threshold indicate strengths or weaknesses:
Positive values indicate strengths, negative values indicate weaknesses.
For the base rate, understanding when to utilize FSIQ versus MIS (Mean Index Score).
Critical Value Comparison and Significance
Reviewing differences in scores for significance analysis:
Example referenced on how to interpret differences in terms of strength/weakness based on critical value tables.
Procedures for calculating and documenting critical values are outlined at the end of this section, summarizing the need for comparative analysis to determine strengths and weaknesses.
Finalizing Reporting and Interpretation
General discussion on how to report findings:
Strengths and weaknesses should be articulated clearly when discussing scores in reports.
Comparison of scores to normative populations versus personal records should be clearly outlined.