What the U.S. Gets Wrong About Iran — Notes
Ibn Khaldun Generational Theory and Iran
- Ibn Khaldun's asabiyyah: Empires decline after 3 generations.
- First generation: united by hardship.
- Second generation: preserves achievements.
- Third/fourth generation: erodes ambition, inviting new power seekers.
- 1979 Iranian Revolution: Transformed Iran into an anti-American Islamist theocracy.
- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Current leader since 1989 (83-years-old); maintains power through hyper-vigilance and brutality, fearing domestic and global opposition.
- Anti-Americanism: Central to Iran's revolutionary identity and global strategy under Khamenei.
Iran's Revolutionary Identity and View of the World
- Iran opposes the U.S.-led world order, allocating significant resources.
- Defines its interests in opposition to the U.S. on major security issues (e.g., Ukraine, Taiwan, nuclear proliferation, cyberwarfare).
Iran's Strategic Behavior and Proxies
- Uses actions of leaders like Putin to gauge and exploit power dynamics, believing it can act with impunity.
- Has entrenched proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen.
- U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan reinforced Tehran's leverage.
- These dynamics complicate reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.
Nuclear Program, Costs, and Deterrence
- Iran's nuclear program has cost over 200,000,000,000 dollars in lost oil revenue.
- Its urgency to compromise on the nuclear deal has diminished, despite reported assassinations and sabotage by Israel.
- Iran's worldview persists even if the nuclear deal is revived.
Policy Conundrum and Long-Term Goals
- U.S. efforts (coercion/persuasion) have limited success because normalizing relations could destabilize Iran's theocratic regime, which is built on anti-American imperialism.
- The U.S. faces a dilemma: engage a regime that resists engagement, and isolate one that thrives in isolation.
- Iran is too influential to ignore, too dogmatic to reform, too brutal to overthrow, and too large to fully contain.
Policy Implications for U.S. Strategy
- Short-term U.S. objective: Counter Iran's nuclear and regional ambitions.
- Long-term U.S. objective: Support or encourage a representative Iranian government aligned with its people's national interests, not revolutionary anti-Americanism.
- Policy approach should balance pressure and openness to prevent escalation while supporting potential future legitimate governance.