What the U.S. Gets Wrong About Iran — Notes

Ibn Khaldun Generational Theory and Iran

  • Ibn Khaldun's asabiyyah: Empires decline after 33 generations.
    • First generation: united by hardship.
    • Second generation: preserves achievements.
    • Third/fourth generation: erodes ambition, inviting new power seekers.
  • 1979 Iranian Revolution: Transformed Iran into an anti-American Islamist theocracy.
  • Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Current leader since 19891989 (8383-years-old); maintains power through hyper-vigilance and brutality, fearing domestic and global opposition.
  • Anti-Americanism: Central to Iran's revolutionary identity and global strategy under Khamenei.

Iran's Revolutionary Identity and View of the World

  • Iran opposes the U.S.-led world order, allocating significant resources.
  • Defines its interests in opposition to the U.S. on major security issues (e.g., Ukraine, Taiwan, nuclear proliferation, cyberwarfare).

Iran's Strategic Behavior and Proxies

  • Uses actions of leaders like Putin to gauge and exploit power dynamics, believing it can act with impunity.
  • Has entrenched proxies in IraqIraq, SyriaSyria, LebanonLebanon, and YemenYemen.
  • U.S. withdrawal from AfghanistanAfghanistan reinforced Tehran's leverage.
  • These dynamics complicate reviving the 20152015 Iran nuclear deal.

Nuclear Program, Costs, and Deterrence

  • Iran's nuclear program has cost over 200,000,000,000200,000,000,000 dollars in lost oil revenue.
  • Its urgency to compromise on the nuclear deal has diminished, despite reported assassinations and sabotage by Israel.
  • Iran's worldview persists even if the nuclear deal is revived.

Policy Conundrum and Long-Term Goals

  • U.S. efforts (coercion/persuasion) have limited success because normalizing relations could destabilize Iran's theocratic regime, which is built on anti-American imperialism.
  • The U.S. faces a dilemma: engage a regime that resists engagement, and isolate one that thrives in isolation.
  • Iran is too influential to ignore, too dogmatic to reform, too brutal to overthrow, and too large to fully contain.

Policy Implications for U.S. Strategy

  • Short-term U.S. objective: Counter Iran's nuclear and regional ambitions.
  • Long-term U.S. objective: Support or encourage a representative Iranian government aligned with its people's national interests, not revolutionary anti-Americanism.
  • Policy approach should balance pressure and openness to prevent escalation while supporting potential future legitimate governance.