termination

Outcome Evaluation

  • Core Purpose

    • Determine if client change is occurring; demonstrate service impact to employers, insurers, state boards.
    • Bridges clinical work with research (“we do meaningful work and can prove it”).

  • Types

    • Outcome evaluation: tracks client progress across time.
    • Outcome research: peer-reviewed studies used to establish an intervention’s empirical support (e.g., CBT).

  • Why Agencies Push for Data

    • School systems must report gains to the state.
    • Intensive settings (in-patient, residential) must justify funding by showing movement “from xx to yy.”

Evidence-Based Practice vs. Practice-Based Evidence

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

    • Selecting techniques supported by peer-review (e.g., CBT manuals, protocols).
    • Connects today’s session with the larger scientific knowledge-base; maintains counseling’s professional legitimacy.

  • Practice-Based Evidence (PBE)

    • Day-to-day monitoring inside the therapy room.
    • “Where did we start? Where are we after 33 months? What’s working/not working?”
    • Requires collaborative conversation: invite client to co-evaluate goals, relationship, and techniques.

Tools for Monitoring Progress

  • Progress Notes

    • DAP (Data, Assessment, Plan) – widely used at practicum sites; concise three-part structure.
    • SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) – equally common.

  • Standardized Measures

    • OQ-4545: 4545-item Outcome Questionnaire covering symptom distress, interpersonal relations, social role, therapeutic alliance, and safety. Taken at every session; red-flags pop up for clinician review.
    • GAD