piaget theory of cognitive development
Objectives of the Section
By the end of this section, students should:
Know the main terms associated with Piaget’s theory.
Be familiar with basic Piagetian tests.
Have a basic understanding of the major concepts of Piaget’s Theory.
What is Cognition?
Definition of cognition:
Higher order mental processes such as thinking, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Components of cognition:
Perception
Action
Interaction with the World
Genetic Epistemology: A Constructivist Theory
Definition of epistemology:
Epistemology is the study of the nature of knowledge.
Definition of constructivism:
Constructivism posits that new skills are built upon older skills, emphasizing the active role of learners in their development.
Piaget’s Theory
Key aspects of Piaget’s theory:
No innate ideas; it is NOT a nativist theory.
The child is not merely a blank slate (tabula rasa); rather, the mind is constructed through interactions with the environment.
Developmental Change According to Piaget
Piaget describes developmental change as:
Occurring in stages which are invariant; these stages are consistent and sequential.
Children do not just possess less knowledge than adults; they understand the world in qualitatively different ways.
Basic Piagetian Principles
Fundamental principles:
Organization of cognitive structures.
Adaptation processes:
Assimilation: Incorporation of new experiences into existing cognitive structures.
Accommodation: Changing old cognitive structures to process new experiences.
Note: Assimilation is viewed as a conservative change, while accommodation is seen as progressive and transformative.
Cognitive Structures and Schemes
Cognitive structures are referred to as schemes.
Early cognitive structures are primitive and basic, evolving with development.
Changes in Schemes with Development
Assimilation:
The process where new experiences are incorporated into existing schemas, reinforcing those schemas.
Accommodation:
The adjustment of existing schemas when new experiences challenge existing cognitive structures.
The Need for Accommodation
Cognitive Development and Equilibrium:
The mind typically exists in a stable state of equilibrium.
A new discrepant experience can disrupt this equilibrium, leading to cognitive instability and the necessity for accommodation of existing structures.
Active Participation in Development
Children as active participants:
Viewed metaphorically as scientists, constantly testing hypotheses about the world.
Their cognitive structures are actively applied to experience, leading to curiosity and a desire for knowledge.
Characteristics of Piaget’s Theory
Piaget’s theory is a robust STAGE theory, characterized by:
Stages that are invariant, universal, hierarchical, and domain general.
Four Basic Stages of Development
The four fundamental stages of cognitive development defined by Piaget:
Sensorimotor Stage: Birth to 2 years
Preoperational Stage: 2 to 7 years
Concrete Operational Stage: 7 to 11 years
Formal Operational Stage: 11 years to adulthood
The Sensorimotor Period (0-2 Years)
Primary developmental structures available: basic motor reflexes.
Major achievements include development of intentionality and understanding of object permanence.
Sensorimotor Period: Stages
Substage 1 (0-1 Month)
Characterized by:
Reflexive activity where all newborn reflexes operate independently.
No intentional actions exhibited; subjectivity and objectivity are fused.
Object Concept at Substage 1
Lack of understanding that objects continue to exist when out of view; no concept of object permanence.
Substage 2 (1-4 Months)
Primary Circular Reactions:
Circular actions are repeated; the infant's behaviors are centered on their own body.
Intentionality begins to emerge, with self-imitation of certain schemes (e.g., thumb sucking).
Object Concept at Substage 2
Displays passive expectation: the existence of objects dependent on schemes applied to experiences.
Substage 3 (4-8 Months)
Secondary Circular Reactions:
Actions focused on external objects are repeated.
Limited understanding of cause and effect hinder ability to act intentionally.
Object Concept at Substage 3
Infants demonstrate visual anticipation; search for partially hidden objects.
Substage 4 (8-12 Months)
Coordination of Secondary Circular Reactions:
Combination of two or more schemes to create new action sequences.
Intentionality:
First appearance of intentionality, referred to as means-ends behavior; infants use one scheme to activate another.
Object Concept:
Search for fully hidden objects; however, infants do not yet understand objects as separate entities from the schemes applied to them.
The A-not-B Error
Phenomenon where infants continue searching for an object at the first hiding location (A) after it has been hidden at a new location (B).
Indicates that the object is still subjectively understood; remains associated with a previously successful scheme.
Substage 5 (12-18 Months)
Tertiary Circular Reactions:
Infants engage in active experimentation to achieve new objectives, discovering new means through interactions.
Limitations exist: active experimentation is restricted to physical actions on objects.
Object Concept at Substage 5
Infants can solve the A-not-B task but fail with invisible displacement, which requires mental calculation of the object's new location.
Substage 6 (18-24 Months)
Symbolic Thought Achievement:
Infants can now mentally represent objects that are physically absent.
Problem-solving evolves into trial and error and can be done mentally rather than physically enacted.
Summary of the Sensorimotor Stage
Concludes with:
The emergence of symbolic representation.
The establishment of object permanence.
Initial development of means-end skills.
The Pre-Operational Period (2-7 Years)
Characterized by:
Symbolic thought, but absence of logical operations (operations are logical principles applicable to symbols).
Thinking during this stage is governed by appearance rather than logical necessity.
The Conservation Task
Example: Conservation of liquid demonstrates challenges in reasoning.
Reasons for Failure in the Conservation Task
Thinking in the pre-operational stage lacks the principles of:
Reversibility: The ability to recognize that some actions can be reversed.
Compensation: Understanding that changes in one dimension can be compensated by changes in another.
Identity: Recognizing that no quantity is lost or gained in transformations.
Characteristics of Pre-Operational Thinking
Characteristics:
Not governed by logical operations, displays egocentrism (e.g., evidenced in the Three Mountains Task) and intuitive problem solving (e.g., in conservation tasks).
The Three Mountains Task
Demonstrates egocentric perspective-taking capability limitations in children.
Nature of Intuitive Reasoning
Features:
Absence of reversibility
Perceptual centration focusing on states rather than transformations.
Domain General Characteristics
Characteristics of pre-operational thinking are observed to be domain general, meaning they apply across various types of knowledge.
Concrete Operations (7-12 Years)
Marked by:
Qualitative differences in reasoning, particularly in conservation tasks.
Flexibility and decentration that allow for the coordination of multiple dimensions in reasoning.
Functioning in logical versus empirical problem-solving situations.
Awareness of transformations and reversibility becomes evident.
Mastery of Logical Operations
Concrete operational thinkers exhibit mastery of:
Conservation tasks and relational logic (including seriation and transitivity).
Logic not yet applied to abstract concepts beyond concrete operations.
Relational Thinking: Transitivity
Definition:
Transitive inference, the process where knowledge of relations allows inference about the relationship between two entities based on their relation to a third entity (e.g., if A>B and B>C, then A>C).
Formal Operations (11+ Years)
Characterized by:
Hypothetico-deductive reasoning: the ability to apply logical reasoning to hypothetical and abstract problems.
Development of abstract scientific thinking.
Differences in Thinking Between Stages
Contrast:
Deductive reasoning in concrete operations is limited to familiar and concrete experiences.
Formal reasoning can deal with hypothetical situations (e.g., questions about injustice and peace).
Inductive Reasoning
Definition:
Thinking like a scientist, which involves generating hypotheses and systematically testing them.
The Pendulum Problem
A specific illustration of inductive reasoning, focusing on the generation of hypotheses related to speed.
Challenges to Piaget’s Sensorimotor Period
Findings:
Infants demonstrate signs of understanding object permanence as early as 4 months.
Understanding of causal relationships appears as early as 6 months.
Experiments on Object Permanence
Habituation Events:
Experiments concerning whether infants can recognize that objects continue to exist even when not directly observed.
Test Events:
Encompass possible and impossible scenarios affecting infants' responses to object permanence.
Challenges to Piaget's Pre-Operational Stage
Findings:
Experience and familiarity can enhance performance in cognitive tasks.
Concept of horizontal decalage, where different conservation concepts are understood at varying ages (e.g., children mastering volume conservation before mass conservation).
Evaluating Piaget's Theory
Overview:
Piaget's theory is extensive and influential but not without complication.
Strengths of Piaget's Theory
Key positives include:
Active view of cognitive development.
Revealing important invariants in cognitive processes.
Informative errors that provide insight into cognitive understanding.
Emphasis on perceptual-motor learning over language development as crucial in development.
Weaknesses of Piaget's Theory
Issues discussed:
Competence-Performance Distinction:
Stress on separating knowledge (competence) versus the expression of that knowledge (performance).
Questioning whether development adheres to strict stage-like characteristics.
Competence Defined
Competence:
Refers to the knowledge, rules, and concepts that contribute to cognition, inferred from behavior.
Performance Defined
Performance:
Factors influencing expression of competence include energy levels, interest, attention, language skills, motivation, etc.
Distinction Impact on A not B Error
Discussion on how Piaget attributed errors (such as the A not B error) purely to cognitive understanding rather than considering potential performance factors that might inhibit exhibiting knowledge.
Views on Staging Development
Consideration of whether stages are observed only by adopting a macro perspective on development; closer inspection might reveal a more fluid and continuous process of change.
Summary of Piaget's Contributions
Overall impression:
Piaget developed a wide-ranging and influential theory that continues to be a source of debate and controversy in the field of cognitive development.