international relations - chapter two notes
Page 1: Realist Perspective
Hegemone: Leadership or dominance, especially by one country or social groups over others.
Schlieffen Plan: Germany’s military strategy aimed at quickly defeating France before turning to fight Russia.
Key Concepts
Realism:
Focuses on power dynamics, security concerns, and the anarchic nature of the international system.
Alliances and Tensions
Two Hostile Alliances:
Triple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.
Triple Entente: Britain, France, and Russia.
Rigid alliances heightened tensions instead of preventing war.
Alliance commitments transformed a regional crisis into a global conflict once war began.
Decline of British Hegemony
Britain had been the hegemonic power in Europe, maintaining stability.
By the early 20th century, its dominance was on the decline.
The rise of Germany as a challenger created instability.
German Strategic Calculations (Preventive War)
Germany feared the rapid industrial and military growth of Russia.
Believed Russia would become too powerful to challenge.
Decided to act preemptively to maintain dominance.
Domestic Pressures for Expansion
Economic and political elites in Germany supported aggressive foreign policies.
Some believed that war would unify the country and suppress domestic unrest.
Austria-Hungary experienced similar nationalist expansionist pressures.
Page 2: Liberal Perspectives
Key Concepts
Liberalism: Highlights diplomatic failures, weak institutions, and miscommunication as key causes of war.
Diplomatic Missteps
Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany had erratic diplomatic policies, deviating from Bismarck's careful strategies.
German leaders misread British intentions, assuming neutrality.
Austro-Hungarian leaders misjudged Russia’s commitment to protecting Serbia.
Poor Crisis Management
Austria-Serbia ultimatum expected limited consequences; however, Russia mobilized in response.
Germany escalated the situation due to inadequate crisis management.
Lack of effective international institutions worsened the crisis.
Democratic Deficit and Weak Domestic Institutions
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia were not fully democratic; leaders lacked accountability to populations.
Public opposition to war was frequently ignored; more democratic states hesitated but were drawn in due to alliances.
Economic Interdependence Failure
Classical liberal theory states that interdependence should prevent war; however, despite trade ties, war still occurred.
Suggests that economic ties do not guarantee peace without strong supporting institutions.
Page 3: Identity Perspective
Key Concepts
Identity Perspective: Focuses on the impact of nationalist movements, cultural beliefs, and ideological forces on foreign policy.
Nationalism as a Driving Force
Serbian nationalist Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered conflict.
Austria-Hungary responded with military action, perceiving it as an attack on sovereignty.
Rival Conceptualizations of National Identity
Pan-Slavism: Russia viewed itself as the protector of Slavic nations, including Serbia.
German Militarism: Promoted an aggressive, militaristic identity, leading to support for war.
French Revanchism: France sought revenge for its Franco-Prussian War losses, viewing war as a chance to reclaim Alsace-Lorraine.
Social Darwinism & the “Cult of the Offensive”
Military leaders believed war was necessary for national survival; the "cult of offensive" encouraged offensive military postures.
This contributed to rapid mobilization and escalation after conflict began.
Shared European Norms & War Culture
Europe had a romanticized view of war as a test of strength and underestimated modern warfare's destructiveness.
Ideological competition between monarchies and emerging nationalist movements intensified conflicts.
Page 4: Key Takeaways
Realism: Focus on power politics; failures in balance of power principles; security dilemmas.
Liberalism: Failures in diplomacy; lack of effective international institutions; leadership failures.
Identity: Nationalism; ideological competition; militaristic cultures.