Perceived Social Support and Mental Health among First-Year College Students Study Notes

Abstract

  • Childhood bullying victimization is linked to adult depression and anxiety, but many previously bullied youth do not exhibit these issues.

  • Identifying protective factors is essential for developing interventions aiding successful adulthood adjustments.

  • The study investigates if perceived social support can mitigate depression and anxiety among first-year college students with previous bullying experiences.

  • Data gathered from 1,474 first-year college students from four U.S. universities in fall 2012; 436 (29.5%) participated in follow-up in spring 2013.

  • Results revealed that childhood bullying victimization correlates positively with depression and anxiety, moderated by social support.

  • Family support notably reduced previously bullied students’ anxiety in spring, highlighting the importance of familial support during college adjustments.

  • Research implications, limitations, and future directions discussed.

Keywords

  • Bullying

  • College adjustment

  • Depression

  • Anxiety

  • Perceived social support

Introduction

  • Definition of Bullying: Repeated aggression aimed at hurting a peer unable to defend themselves (Gladden et al. 2013). Forms include teasing, rumor-spreading, ignoring, threats (Felix et al. 2011).

  • Prevalence of Bullying: Approx. 35% prevalence in childhood bullying, 15% in cyberbullying (Modecki et al. 2014).

  • Outcomes of Bullying: Linked to depression, anxiety, and suicidality (Cook et al. 2010; Gren-Landell et al. 2011).

  • Long-term Effects: Bullying impacts persist into adulthood, increasing risks for poor mental health (McCabe et al. 2010; Ttofi et al. 2011).

Mental Health and College Adjustment

  • Previously bullied students face greater depression and anxiety compared to non-bullied peers during college adjustment (Holt et al. 2014).

  • College is inherently a stressful period, which may hinder integration into college life and affect academic performance (Gall et al. 2000; Pritchard et al. 2007).

  • Notably, ⅔ of previously bullied students in college do not meet criteria for depression/anxiety, indicating protective factors warrant investigation.

Role of Social Support

  • Function of Social Support: Acts as a risk or protective factor against psychological distress (Shortt and Spence 2006; WHO 2012).

  • Perceived Social Support: The belief in having reliable family and friends is linked to better psychological health (Chu et al. 2010; Cohen and Wills 1985; Lakey and Cronin 2008).

  • Bullying’s correlation with lower social support underscores its psychological impact (Demaray and Malecki 2003).

  • Protective Role in Adolescents: Studies consistently show perceived social support mitigates depression for bullied youth (Davidson and Demaray 2007; Holt and Espelage 2007; Tanigawa et al. 2011).

Theoretical Framework

  • Stress Buffering Theory: Suggests perceived social support can buffer against negative life impacts, aiding coping abilities (Cohen and Wills 1985).

  • Main Effect Theory: Posits high social support correlates with better mental health irrespective of stress (Cohen and Wills 1985).

  • Both theories seek to clarify the relationship between social support and mental health, especially among bullied individuals.

Research Objectives

  1. Examine if perceived social support mitigates poor mental health among bullied college students.

  2. Postulate that bullied students with high perceived social support exhibit better mental health outcomes compared to those with lower levels of support.

Methodology

Participants

  • A sample (N = 6,988) drawn from four large U.S. universities responded, with 1,474 completing the fall survey (65.2% female). Follow-up participation was 29.5%.

  • Demographics: 50.4% White/Caucasian, 25.8% Asian, 15.7% Hispanic, 3.7% Black/African American, 4.4% other.

Procedure

  • Recruitment conducted via email at four respective colleges, with varied response rates based on the method used.

Measures

California Bully-Victimization Scale (CBVS)

  • Assesses childhood bullying victimization via intentional, repeated acts encompassing power imbalances. Eight forms of victimization were measured.

Depression Assessment

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A validated tool for measuring depression severity through symptom frequency assessment.

Anxiety Assessment

  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A performance tool assessing anxiety severity based on similar frequency metrics.

Perceived Social Support Measurement

  • Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Evaluates perceived support from friends, family, and significant others with high internal reliability.

Analysis Methods

  • Analyses controlled for gender and race/ethnicity.

  • Regression analyses to assess relationships between bullying, social support, and mental health indicators conducted using SPSS.

  • Examined social support levels in relation to depression and anxiety across both survey semesters.

Results

Bullying Statistics and Social Support Assessment

  • 29.4% previously bullied versus 70.6% not bullied among participants. Follow-up revealed similar identification percentages.

  • Previously bullied students reported lower levels of perceived social support across all measurement types.

Association Between Victimization and Mental Health

  • Higher levels of depression and anxiety were recorded among bullied students in fall and spring semesters:

    • Fall Depression (B = 1.86, p < .001)

    • Spring Anxiety (B = 1.270, p = .011)

  • Dependence on social support moderated some impacts.

Interaction Effects of Social Support

  • Total perceived social support correlated with decreased anxiety, demonstrating stress-buffering properties (B = -.052, p < .001).

Discussion

  • Results align with previous findings linking childhood bullying to heightened depression and anxiety risks during college.

  • Identified social support as a potential protective factor against these mental health risks, emphasizing the importance of increasing social support initiatives.

  • Findings also reflect differences between perceived familial and peer support in moderating anxiety, warranting deeper investigation into these dynamics.

Limitations

  • The study sample's representativity and reliance on self-reporting limit findings' generalizability.