Study Guide on The Rise of Illiberal Democracy by Fareed Zakaria
The Rise of Illiberal Democracy
Introduction to Illiberal Democracy
Author: Fareed Zakaria
Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 1997), pp. 22-43
Published by: Council on Foreign Relations
URL: JSTOR
Access Date: 24/01/2015 13:59
Overview: Discussion of the increasing presence of illiberal democracies across the world, highlighting the distinction between democracy and constitutional liberalism.
The Problem of Democracy
Richard Holbrooke's Dilemma
On elections in Bosnia: Potential results including the rise of unqualified leaders (racists, fascists).
Essential question: How to address outcomes of free elections that contradict democratic values?
Understanding Illiberal Democracy
Definition and Growth
Illiberal democracy: Democratically elected regimes that violate constitutional limits and deprive citizens of basic rights and freedoms.
Examples include: Peru, Palestinian Authority, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Pakistan, and the Philippines.
Indicators of growth: 118 out of 193 countries are democratic (54.8% of the global population), indicating a rise from previous decades.
Illiberal democracy on a spectrum from moderate offenders (e.g., Argentina) to near-tyrannies (e.g., Kazakhstan).
Freedom House Survey (1996-97): Distinction between political liberties (democracy) and civil liberties (constitutional liberalism).
Democracy vs. Liberal Democracy
Distinction
Democracy is typically defined as the process of selecting governments through elections.
Constitutional liberalism includes the protection of individual rights, rule of law, and limits on governmental power.
Historical evolution of liberal democracy: Separate growth of democracy and liberal values in modern political systems.
Historical Context
Evolution in Western Governments
Post-1945: Western governments have largely embodied both democracy and constitutional liberalism.
Historical patterns: Many Western countries transitioned from liberal autocracies to full democracies by the 1940s.
Regional Variations in Democracy
East Asia:
Following the Western pattern; however, most regimes remain semi-democratic or authoritarian, with limited political rights despite economic growth.
Latin America and Africa: Rapid democratization with poor foundations of constitutional liberalism; examples of human rights abuses observed post-election.
Islamic World: Risk of increased theocracy and oppression alongside the rise of democratically elected governments.
Example: Iran with restrictions on freedoms despite a democratic facade.
The Role of Constitutional Liberalism
Definition and Importance
Constitutional liberalism is vital for protecting individual autonomy from majority rule and abuse of power, contrary to pure democracy.
John Stuart Mill and historical reflections on democracy's potential for tyranny.
Global Implications
Risks and Dangers
Illiberal democracies can legitimize repressive regimes and erode older liberal democratic norms.
Historical correlations: Past democratic waves led to disillusionment, leading to autocratic backsliding.
The need for international community engagement: Supporting the development of constitutional liberalism rather than merely advocating for elections.
Conclusion
Expectation vs. Reality of Democracy
Stable democracies require balanced systems of governance resistant to tyranny, emphasizing the relationship between democratic processes and constitutional liberties.
Emphasis on the importance of checks and balances in preventing governmental overreach.
Evolutionary trajectory and the necessity for new political frameworks that accommodate the realities of varying cultures and histories.
References and Citations
Zakaria’s observations echoing historically prominent figures and foundational documents that shape the discourse on democracy and governance.