Social Relations and Pro-social Behavior
Social Relations
6.1 Interpersonal Attraction
Humans are fundamentally social beings, with relationships being central to our existence.
Aristotle referred to humans as "the social animal," highlighting our innate need to connect with others.
Social psychologists emphasize the need to belong, which is the desire to form enduring, close relationships.
Baumeister and Leary (1995) illustrated the importance of social attachments:
Survival Benefit: Mutual attachments enhanced group survival for ancestors by facilitating hunting and shelter construction.
Procreation: Bonds of love between heterosexual partners lead to children, with two-parent support improving survival rates.
Child Development: Social attachments are vital for children's survival; separation from caregivers can cause panic, and neglect can lead to anxious behaviors.
Social Life: Relationships significantly influence the lives of university students and people of all sexual orientations, impacting thoughts and emotions.
Self-Esteem: Healthy relationships with partners, family, and friends boost self-esteem.
Social Acceptance: People seek acceptance and love, investing in cosmetics, clothing, and diets to enhance their appeal. Even those who seem aloof still desire acceptance (Carvallo & Gabriel, 2006).
Isolation: Exiled, imprisoned, or solitary individuals long for connection and suffer when rejected, increasing the risk of depression (Nolan & others, 2003). This isolation makes time seem slower and life less meaningful (Twenge & others, 2003).
Loss of Bonds: Loss of social bonds (e.g., through death, relocation) results in pain, loneliness, and withdrawal, intensifying awareness of mortality and life's fragility.
Mortality Salience: Heightened awareness of death increases the need to connect and hold loved ones close (Mikulincer & others, 2003; Wisman & Koole, 2003).
Key Terms
Interpersonal Attraction: Showing a preference for another person, underlying the motivation to spend time with certain individuals.
Need to Affiliate/Belong: The motive to establish, maintain, or restore social relationships, whether individually or through groups (McClelland & Koestner, 1992).
Affiliation relates to associating with accepting but indifferent people (e.g., classmates, coworkers).
Belonging involves deep attachment to individuals who truly care (e.g., family, significant others, best friends).
Research Findings:
Leadership: Leaders high in the need for affiliation are more attentive to followers' needs and engage in transformational leadership (Steinmann, Otting, & Maier, 2016).
Online Courses: Individuals with a high need for affiliation are less likely to want to take online courses, while those with a high need for autonomy are more inclined to do so (Seiver & Troja, 2014).
Religiosity: Religiosity positively correlates with social affiliation unless the affiliation target is perceived as a threatening out-group member (e.g., an atheist) (van Cappellen et al., 2017).
Group Exclusion: Fear of group exclusion can drive individuals with a high need for inclusion/affiliation to engage in pro-group unethical behaviors (Thau et al., 2015).
Interpersonal Distance: Individuals with strong affiliation goals perceive smaller interpersonal distances (Stel & van Koningsbruggen, 2015).
Loneliness
Loneliness arises when interpersonal relationships are unfulfilling, leading to psychological discomfort, particularly affecting the elderly.
Tiwari (2013) identified three forms of loneliness:
Situational Loneliness: Arises from unpleasant experiences, conflicts, disasters, or accidents.
Developmental Loneliness: Results from an inability to balance the need for connection with the need for individualism, leading to a loss of meaning.
Internal Loneliness: Stems from low self-esteem, feelings of worthlessness, and inadequate coping strategies.
Loneliness is considered a significant public health issue, leading to pain, injury, grief, fear, fatigue, exhaustion, sickness, and impaired daily functioning.
Implications
Tiwari suggests that loneliness should be classified as a disease in psychiatric disorders due to its adverse effects.
Development of Affiliation and Attachment
Smiling and Affiliation: Infants begin smiling at around 6-9 weeks old in response to pleasing stimuli. Social smiles, directed at others, become more selective as the infant matures.
Emotional Communication: Smiling communicates positive emotion, and children become attuned to others' emotional expressions. Social smiles fade away if the adult is unresponsive.
Stranger Anxiety: Before 6 months, infants are generally indifferent to strangers, but they develop stranger anxiety as they learn to predict events. Infants with more social experience show less anxiety.
Factors Reducing Anxiety: Infants show less anxiety towards female strangers and children, possibly due to size and perceived threat.
Emotional Detection: Infants begin to detect emotions, discerning vocal expressions before visual ones.
Social Referencing: Around 8-9 months, infants use social referencing to seek information from caregivers in uncertain situations, such as the presence of a stranger.
The infant observes the caregiver's emotional reaction to determine how to respond.
Play and Affiliation: Children's play behaviors evolve with age:
Solitary Play: Up to 1.5 years, children play alone.
Parallel Play: Between 1.5 and 2 years, children play side-by-side without direct interaction.
Associative Play: Children interact by sharing toys but do not engage in the same activity.
Cooperative Play: Around 3 years, children engage in group imagination games like "playing house."
Onlooker Play: Children participate by observing and waiting to join existing games.
Attachment
Attachment is an emotional bond providing a sense of security. Early attachment styles influence later relationships.
Ainsworth's Attachment Styles (1978):
Secure Attachment: The child uses the mother as a home base to explore, becomes upset upon separation, and seeks comfort upon her return.
Avoidant Attachment: The child avoids closeness and ignores the mother upon her return.
Ambivalent Attachment: The child shows mixed positive and negative emotions, remains close to the mother, limits exploration, and may act aggressively upon her return.
Disorganized-Disoriented Attachment: Characterized by inconsistent behaviors, confusion, and dazed behavior (Main & Solomon, 1990). For instance, approaching the mother without making eye contact.
Factors Influencing Attraction
Proximity: Increased physical proximity leads to more interaction and greater liking.
Festinger, Schachter, and Back (1950) found proximity was a primary factor in friendship formation in a housing project.
Face-to-face communication, shared space, and time are essential factors (Monge & Kirste, 1980).
Proximity is a consistent determinant of interpersonal attraction across cultures (Allgeier and Byrne, 1972; Batool & Malik, 2010).
A study in Punjab, Pakistan, showed that friends living closer together had higher interpersonal attraction scores (Batool & Malik, 2010).
Mere Exposure Effect: Repeated exposure to stimuli increases liking, even if the stimuli are initially negative.
Saegert, Swap, & Zajonc (1973) found that repeated exposure enhances attraction, even in unfavorable contexts.
Increasing familiarity through exposure increases attractiveness ratings of faces, with typical faces rated as more attractive than distinctive ones (Peskin and Newell, 2004).
Physical Attractiveness: Attractive individuals are perceived as more interesting, happier, smarter, sensitive, and moral, leading to greater liking.
Halo Effect: A favorable attitude towards unrelated traits is associated with attractiveness.
Walster et al. (1966) found that physical attractiveness was the most significant determinant of liking and dating desire in a "Computer Dance" field study.
Hosoda, Stone-Romero, and Coats (2006) found that attractive individuals have advantages in employment decisions, although the beauty bias has weakened over time.,
Similarity: Attraction is strongest towards those similar in religious and political beliefs, values, appearance, educational background, and age (Warren, 1966).
Similarity validates one's own beliefs and reduces uncertainty.
Perceived similarity with sports teams leads to group-derived self-definition (Fisher, 1998).
Matching hypothesis: We date others who are similar to us in terms of attractiveness.
Reciprocity: We prefer those who make us feel rewarded and appreciated, fostering mutual exchange.
Interactions are mutually beneficial so long as the benefits outweigh the costs (Homans, 1961; Thibaut & Kelley, 1959).
Reciprocal liking and desire increase attraction (Aronson & Worchel, 1966; Greitmeyer, 2010).
Playing Hard to Get: Research suggests that being selectively hard to get (easy for a specific person but hard for others) can increase desirability.
Men prefer women who are selectively hard to get (Walster et al., 1973).
Dai, Dong, and Jia (2014) found that playing hard to get increases wanting but decreases liking unless person A is committed to person B.
Intimacy: Feeling close and trusting in another person, based on mutual self-disclosure.
Self-disclosure involves sharing deep secrets and beliefs with the expectation of reciprocal self-disclosure.
Sheldon (2009) found that Facebook users disclose personal secrets to those they like and trust.
Overdisclosure can reduce attractiveness.
Mate Selection: Men and women employ different strategies influenced by evolutionary psychology.
Men seek signs of fertility (youth, attractiveness, health) and sexual faithfulness (Buss, 2004).
Women prioritize financial stability and provision for children, typically favoring older men.
Buss (1989) found that men prefer to marry women 2.7 years younger, while women prefer men 3.4 years older, cross-culturally.
6.2 Pro-social Behavior
Prosocial behavior refers to actions that help others without immediate benefit to the helper.
Motives Behind Prosocial Behavior
Empathy-Altruism: Helping others due to experiencing empathy and wanting to alleviate their suffering.
Negative State Relief Model: Helping others to reduce one's own negative feelings.
Empathic Joy: Helping others to accomplish something rewarding.
Competitive Altruism: Helping others to enhance one's status and reputation.
Kin Selection Theory: Helping genetic relatives to ensure the survival of shared genes.
Crucial Steps Determining Helping and Non-Helping (Latane and Darley, 1970)
Noticing the Event: Recognizing that something unusual is happening.
Interpreting the Event as an Emergency: Correctly identifying the situation as an emergency rather than something benign.
Assuming Responsibility: Deciding that it is one's personal duty to provide assistance.
Knowing How to Help: Possessing the necessary knowledge and skills to act effectively.
Deciding to Implement Help: Making the final decision to provide help, weighing potential positive and negative consequences.
In summary, deciding to help involves several crucial steps and decisions that determine whether a bystander will intervene in an emergency.