Social Contract Theory
Thomas Hobbes
moral rules are rules rational individuals would agree to for their mutual benefit
enter into contract to escape state of nature
state of nature = state of war
why?
so similar in nature that no one naturally enjoys dominance over other people/things
same basic needs
scarcity of things
we are primarily self-interested, and have strong desire for self-preservation
moral rules are a tool that allow people to escape the state of nature
we agree to constrain our behaviour in accordance with certain rules, in order to live better than we otherwise would
objections
does not explain all of morality
where there are no agreements, nothing would be moral or immoral
John Rawls
not a complete ethical theory, but a theory of distributive justice
distributive justice: a term to refer to just distribution of goods
Rawls = social contract theorist
thinks that principles of distribution arise from contract between people they govern
principles of distribution ← hypothetical agreement
two key concepts
veil of ignorance
original position
two principles
principle of maximal equal basic liberties
a) principle of fair equality of opportunity
each person should have a meaningful opportunity to attain employment, education, and positions of power
b) difference principle
social + economic equality, unless inequality benefits everyone, especially those in the worst off group
lexical priority = 1, 2a, 2b
so fundamental rights and liberties cannot be compromised for economic advantage
objections
difference principle is not the best way to achieve tolerable situation for worst off
difference principle is unfair