Costs and Consequences of Plasticity

Costs of Plasticity

  • Production Costs: The energetic costs of producing a plastic phenotype, specifically the shifting of a response. It can be hard to demonstrate since producing a flexible phenotype has to be costly.
  • Maintenance Costs: Maintaining the sensory machinery required to detect environmental changes and initiate a plastic response. Includes genes to sense environmental changes.
  • Information Acquisition Costs: Costs associated with actively sensing the environment (e.g., energy expenditure for predator detection).
  • Developmental Instability: Imperfect phenotypic changes during development. Results in issues like fluctuating asymmetry (e.g., wonky wing shape affecting flight).
  • Genetic Costs: Alleles coding for plasticity may have links to lower fitness. The negative interactions between genes/alleles (epistasis) influence fitness.
  • Limits to Benefits: Occur due to unreliable information, lag time limits if environment fluctuates too fast. The plastic response may not be fast enough or the right response.

Developmental Range Limit

  • Fixed responses are sometimes better than plastic adjustments. It might be better to produce one fixed phenotype than a phenotype that can change. Epiphenotype problem: fixed phenotype might be better in a different way.

Trade-Off Plasticity Hypothesis

  • The species with the highest tolerance from the warmest habitats didn't show the biggest response, but showed the smallest response.
  • Species with low initial tolerance from cooler habitats could show a plastic response.
  • Species with a higher tolerance had the highest responses. Species with the low tolerance had low responses.

Unexpected Results

  • Behavioral responses to environmental stressors, such as the presence of predators or pesticides, can have unexpected effects on survival and development.

Transgenerational Plasticity

  • Plastic responses can persist across generations via epigenetics (no gene change) or maternal effects.
  • Example: Daphnia producing head spikes in response to a chemical cue from predators. The effect diminishes in the second generation.
  • Example: Bryozoan species exposed to copper:
    • Parents exposed to copper pass on resistance to their offspring.
    • No genetic change or selection is involved.
    • Offspring of exposed parents show lower fitness in clean water.

Consequences of Plasticity Across Ecosystems

  • Predator-prey oscillations can be stabilized by plasticity in prey species (e.g., phytoplankton producing defensive chemicals).
  • Plasticity can influence species interactions:
    • Wood frogs hide from predators, decreasing growth rate and competitive ability with leopard frogs.
    • Crabs cause snails to hide, affecting algae density due to reduced grazing.

Whelk and Barnacles

  • Barnacles exhibit plasticity in response to whelk predators:
    • Conic shape (normal) or bent form (protective).
    • Whelk predation induces bent form development.
    • Bent form has lower growth rate and egg production but higher survival when whelks are present.
    • The whelk slithering over the barnacles is a signal, developmental signal for them to produce this bent form versus the conic form.
    • Whelks are the cause that the bent phenotype occurs, not other snails/predators.