Nondemocracy
Nondemocracy Defined:
Regimes that lack democracy, sometimes called authoritarianism
Authoritarianism: a political system in which a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public.
Nondemocratic regime: a political regime controlled by a small group of individuals who exercise power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
Not all authoritarian regimes are totalitarian
The term totalitarianism is frequently misused
Some call for abandoning the term
Totalitarianism: a nondemocratic regime that is highly centralized
Modernization and Nondemocratic Rule
Old thinking
Development leads to urbanization and education, which in turn leads the middle class to demand democracy
New thinking
Modernization sometimes reinforces nondemocracy
Modernization can be a disruptive and uneven process
Urbanization transforms institutions and norms
Technology can leave some behind
Economies and job markets shift
Elite and Non-Democratic Rule:
Entrenched elites are unwilling to share power
May be reinforced by the resource curse
Resource curse: a theory of development in which the existence of natural resources in a given state is a barrier to modernization and democratization
Resource curse basics
States generate resources without taxation
Unequal development stunts civil society
Resources are not portable, so control of resources requires controlling the state
A weak civil society may allow nondemocracy to survive
Example: the different paths of Zimbabwe and South Africa
A strong civil society may emerge, but still
Promote nondemocratic values
Populism: a political view that does not have a consistent ideological foundation, but that emphasizes hostility toward elites and established state and economic institutions, and favors greater power in the hands of the public
Take on nondemocratic tendencies
Ethnic favoritism, xenophobia
Example: Hungary’s Viktor Orban
International Relations and Nondemocratic Rule
International actors influence regime type through
Foreign occupation
imperial legacy
backing nondemocratic forces
Examples:
Cold War era
USSR in Eastern Europe
United States in Iran (1953) or Chile (1973)
More recently: China and Russia in Africa and the Middle East
Nondemocratic Regimes and Political Control
Coercion and Surveillance
Coercion: compelling individuals by threatening their lives or livelihoods
Relies on the use of fear to discourage opposition
Tactics include killing, torture, job loss, and threats to family.
Can be targeted or indiscriminate violence
Often relies on surveillance to identify targets
Limits of Coercion:
It can undermine regime legitimacy
It may create more widespread grievances
It is costly to maintain
At least some people have to benefit from the regime, or there would be no soldiers to carry out the orders
Co-optation
Co-optation: the process by which individuals outside an organization are brought into a beneficial relationship with the state
Selectively provide benefits to key groups
Make the population dependent on the state for certain rewards
Two forms
Corporatism
Clientelism
Corporatism: a method in which nondemocratic regimes attempted to solidify their control over the public by creating or sanctioning a limited number of organizations to represent the interests of the public and restrict those not set up or approved by the state
Clientelism: the state co-opts members of the public by providing specific benefits to people in return for public support
States may reward supporters with jobs, goods, and/or rent-seeking
Rent seeking: a process in which political leaders essentially rent out parts of the state to their patrons, who, as a result, control public goods that would otherwise be distributed in a nonpolitical manner.
Can decline into kleptocracy: “rule by theft”; those in power seek only to drain the state of assets and resources
Examples
Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth
Russia’s energy interests
Personality Cults
Personality cults: veneration of leadership
Quasi-religious; emotional appeal to legitimize rule
Leader depiction
Embodies the spirit of the nation
Endowed with wisdom and strength far beyond the average individual
Active use of media and art to reinforce this image
Examples:
Iran (Supreme Leader)
Russia (Vladimir Putin)
North Korea (Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il, and Kim Jong-un
Military Rule
Rule by one or more military officials
Often brought to power through coup d’état
Sometimes follows periods of unrest; military leaders promise stability
Examples
Chile (1970s)
Egypt since 2011
Main tool of control: coercion
May focus on technocratic rule
Bureaucratic authoritarianism: a system in which the state bureaucracy leadership, focused on rational objective and technical expertise, can solve the problems of the country without relying on political participation
One Party Rule
A single political party monopolizes politics
All other parties are banned/ excluded from power
No area is untouched by the presence of the party, helping the party to maintain control over the public
Main tools of control: co-optation
Theocracy:
“Rule by God”
Religion as the foundation of the regime
Main tools of control
traditional legitimacy
corporatism
No pure cases of modern theocracies
Saudi Arabia: combines theocratic and monarchic
The Islamic Republic of Iran: mostly theocratic, some illiberal regime features
Illiberal Regimes:
Illiberal regimes: also known as hybrid, electoral authoritarian, and semi-democratic regimes
Combine democratic and nondemocratic elements
Growing in prominence around the world
Examples: Cameroon, Russia, Venezuela
Common features
Weak or poorly respected rule of law
Executives hold an overwhelming degree of power
Elections are manipulated
Few civil freedoms
Summary:
Nondemocracy refers to a broad category of states
The upheaval of modernization, elite resource control, societal structures, and international actors
Major categories of nondemocratic rule include monarchies, military rule, one-party states, theocracies, and illiberal regimes
While there are more democracies now than there were 30 years ago, nondemocracy has been on the rise in recent years