Radiology 7:3D Imaging in Dentistry
3D Imaging in Dentistry
Presented by Shaza Mardini DDS, MS, Dip. ABOMR
Focus on Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology
History of 3D in Dentistry
Pre-2000 Era
3D imaging was primarily restricted to medical CT (Computed Tomography) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging).
Utilized mainly in oral surgery applications or cases involving major pathology.
Concerns with medical CT include:
High radiation dose associated with CT scans.
High costs of MRI and limited utility primarily for soft tissue imaging.
Importance of 3D in Dentistry
Key Benefits:
Accuracy: Superior precision in dental evaluations and treatment planning.
Enhanced Visualization:
Ability to visualize anatomy across all dimensions, improving diagnostic capabilities.
Improved Diagnosis:
More detailed anatomical insight leading to better patient outcomes.
3D vs. 2D Imaging
Advantages of 3D Imaging Compared to 2D:
One Scan, Multiple Images:
A single scan produces multiple image perspectives of the same region.
1:1 Measurement:
Allows accurate measurements without the distortions typically found in 2D images.
Third Dimension:
Facilitates identifying anatomical obstacles and improving diagnostic accuracy.
Countering Myths:
CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) is a relatively new technology; however, it's essential for contemporary dental practices.
Addresses misconceptions regarding unnecessary information and workflow disruptions.
Patient acceptance of 3D scans is increasing as awareness and familiarity grow.
Challenges Associated with 3D Imaging
True Obstacles to Implementing 3D Imaging:
Initial Cost:
High startup expenses for acquiring CBCT technology.
Learning Curve:
Requires training in scanning techniques and understanding protocols.
Workflow Integration:
Need to establish streamlined workflows to incorporate scanning into practice utilization effectively.
Responsibility for Scan Interpretations:
Clinicians must be prepared for the interpretation of the scans, adding a layer of responsibility.
Patient Movement:
Motion artifacts during scanning can compromise image quality.
Artifacts:
Increased artifacts may occur which can complicate the reading of images.
3D Imaging Characteristics
Dimensional Imaging:
2-Dimensional Imaging was the norm before advancements in 3D technologies.
Comparison to Traditional Imaging Techniques:
Traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry lacks the detailed insights provided by 3D approaches as highlighted by studies like Gregory L. Adams et al.
Measured differences noted between traditional physical calipers and newer 3D sculpting techniques.
Intraoral Imaging Benefits
Advantageous for Bone Detail:
Highly effective for visualizing bone specifics during procedures such as implants.
Limitations noted include the inability to provide specifics on width, height, trajectory angulation, and location of critical structures such as:
Mandibular canal
Maxillary sinus
Panoramic Imaging Overview
Functions as a Screening Tool:
Evaluates the overall health of dental structures, with inherent challenges like distortion, magnification, ghost images, and superimposition.
Cephalometric Imaging
Utility in Orthodontics:
Primarily used for assessing skeletal relationships and diagnosing orthodontic conditions.
Common Limitations:
Known issues with superimposition and magnification distortions that can affect treatment planning.
Volumetric Imaging (CBCT)
Technological Overview:
Computed Tomography provides true 3D imaging capabilities crucial in both dentistry and medicine.
CBCT Developments:
Introduction of devices such as the 3D Accuitomo 170, designed to enhance field of view (FOV) and image quality.
CBCT Field of View (FOV)
FOV Specifications:
Ranges from various dimensions (e.g., 8 cm x 8 cm, up to larger sizes).
Specific applications dependent on FOV size including:
Imaging for general dentistry, orthodontics, and surgical guides.
Determining optimal size for capturing specific areas such as sinuses, TMJ, or dental arches.
Voxel Representation in CBCT
Understanding Voxels:
Voxel represents the smallest volume element in 3D imaging; contributes to shades of gray that provide diagnostic insights.
Importance of Voxel Size:
Smaller voxel sizes correspond to better resolution in imaging.
Dose Considerations in 3D Imaging
Effective Dose:
Used to assess risks associated with radiologic exposure; varies between imaging types with measurements in Sieverts (Sv), Millisieverts (mSv), and Microsieverts (μSv).
Background Radiation Data:
Statistical insights indicate an average radiation dose from CBCT is considerably lower than conventional CT; typically ranges between 84-212 μSv for medium FOV.
Imaging Quality
Quality Metrics:
Includes detailing around voxel size resolution, imaging time duration, and achieved shades of gray.
The balance must be struck between lowest dose and highest resolution output for optimal imaging.
Clinical Applications of CBCT
Versatile Utilization:
Assessment of structures in three dimensions for pathology, bone evaluation, endodontic assessments, and implant planning.
Broader tasks include 3D modeling or printing, surgical guide creation, orthodontic planning, and airway analysis.
Conclusion and Implications
Future Directions:
The significance of 3D imaging in dental and facial structural analyses is undeniable; has proven to be a cornerstone in modern dental practices.
Takeaways:
Provides invaluable insights into areas typically superimposed in traditional imaging.
Enables measurement of bone and airway structures while maintaining lower exposure risk than MDCT (Multi-slice CT).
Questions?
Audience invited for questions and clarifications post-presentation.