DNA Analysis and Case of DPP v Michael O'Callaghan

DNA Analysis Introduction

  • DNA profiling was discovered by Sir Alex Jeffreys in the 1980s in the UK.

  • Considered a crucial advancement in crime investigation, comparable to fingerprinting (Jim Fraser, 2010).

  • Led to the establishment of a DNA database in the Republic of Ireland (Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database Systems) Act 2014).

  • DNA profiles can be used to include or exclude individuals in criminal or missing persons cases.

  • Overview of DNA analysis importance and its role in police investigations.

DNA and the Human Genome

  • DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid):

    • Genetic material of most living organisms.

    • Nuclear DNA found in chromosomes in cell nuclei.

  • Types of DNA:

    • Nuclear DNA: Main genetic material, present in all body cells except red blood cells.

    • Mitochondrial DNA: Found in mitochondria, useful in identifying remains (e.g., Tuam Mother and Baby Home).

  • DNA Structure:

    • Composed of two complementary strands forming a double helix (resembles a twisted ladder).

    • Molecules of sugar (deoxyribose) and phosphate link nucleotides (A, T, G, C).

    • Human genome consists of 22 pairs of chromosomes and sex chromosomes, housing all genetic material.

  • Genes and Alleles:

    • Genes define heredity, made of two alleles (one from each parent).

    • 25% of nuclear DNA is involved in gene expression; 75% is non-coding (junk DNA).

    • Non-coding DNA contains repetitive sequences such as Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) which are significant for DNA analysis.

Process of DNA Analysis

  • Steps in DNA extraction and analysis:

    • Extraction: Method varies by tissue type; epithelial cells are easier compared to bone.

    • Purification: Disrupt cell membranes, denature proteins, separate DNA.

    • Quantification: Assess DNA amount for testing.

  • Amplification:

    • Required DNA amount for testing is between 0.5-2.5 nanograms, amplified using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

    • PCR creates 100 million to 1 billion copies of targeted DNA.

  • Electrophoresis:

    • Analyzes DNA profiles based on electrical charge and mass, producing an electropherogram (EPG).

    • Comparing unknown DNA profiles to known profiles, typically requires matching at 10 loci.

  • Statistical Analysis of DNA:

    • Probability of identical DNA sequences decreases as more loci are compared (e.g., Ace of Cards analogy).

    • Fewer matches indicate unique DNA profiles; 10 loci match is rare in populations.

The Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database Systems) Act 2014

  • Purpose:

    • Replaced outdated methods of forensic sample collection with updated regulations.

    • Established a DNA database for criminal investigations and for helping locate missing individuals.

    • Regulates samples taken from both suspects and volunteers.

  • Advantages:

    • DNA analysis quickly excludes or includes individuals in investigations.

    • Assists in exonerating wrongful convictions, but not infallible.

  • Concerns:

    • Technical risks and potential violation of fundamental rights (Council of Europe Recommendation, 1992).

DPP v Michael O’Callaghan [2013] Case Analysis

  • Incident Overview:

    • Armed robbery at Blackpool Post Office, March 26, 2009; about €20,000 stolen.

    • Witness accounted for suspects’ actions, enabling evidence collection.

  • DNA Evidence:

    • O’Callaghan’s DNA found on a balaclava linked to the robbery.

    • Trial based on eyewitness testimony, his contradictory accounts, and DNA analysis.

  • Court Proceedings:

    • O’Callaghan appealed conviction on grounds of insufficient evidence.

    • Court found that the critical evidence was the DNA from the balaclava, but its interpretation was problematic.

  • Forensic Analysis of the Balaclava:

    • Forensic scientist could create a DNA profile from samples taken from the balaclava.

    • Major component matched O’Callaghan, but mix from other individuals led to ambiguity regarding who wore the balaclava.

  • Court Decision:

    • Lengthy examination of the DNA evidence concluded insufficient basis to ascertain guilt.

    • The Court ruled the trial outcome unsafe, leading to conviction being overturned based on unclear forensic evidence.