Cultural Evolution
Cultural Evolution in Psychology
Prominent Theories of Cultural Evolution
Gene-Culture Co-Evolution/Dual Inheritance Theory
Cultural Group Selection Theory
Cumulative Cultural Evolution/The Ratchet Effect
Shared Intentionality
Cultural Attraction Theory/Epidemiology of Representations
Cultural Niche
Network-Based Models
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Van der Bergh, 2018, Human Evolution: Beyond Biology and Culture.
Some of the Most Prominent Cultural Evolution Theories
Dual Inhertiance/Gene-Culture Co-evolution
Dual Inheritance/Gene-Culture Co-Evolution
Definition: The theory that genetic and cultural evolution interact with one another.
Culture provides selective pressure on genes.
Genetics enables cultural features and behaviors.
Feedback Loop Example:
Adoption of agriculture leads to selection pressures for lactose genes.
Principles:
Cultural change can be interpreted in Darwinian terms, including:
Social learning biases.
Survival of certain traits.
Niche Construction: Mutual modification between humans and their environments.
Example: Farming leads to property rights and advancements such as irrigation.
Evolutionary Trajectories: Culture actively shapes evolutionary outcomes rather than passively being a result.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Whitehead et al., 2019, Nature Communications.
Example: The Obstetrical Dilemma
Concept: A tradeoff that highlights the interplay between biology and culture.
Narrow pelvis is advantageous for bipedalism.
Larger neonatal heads due to increased brain size.
Cultural Response:
The solution lies in cultural practices.
Resulting in:
Giving birth to immature infants necessitates an extended childhood.
Cooperative child-rearing practices emerge.
Development of obstetric practices and technologies (e.g., midwifery).
Cultural Niche: Knowledge from collective experiences mitigates the complexities and risks associated with childbirth and extended care requirements for infants.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Example: Cooking Hypothesis
Researcher: Richard Wrangham.
Premise: Cooking food leads to significant physical changes.
Results in:
Smaller and weaker teeth and jaw muscles.
Smaller mouth size and reduced chewing time.
Decreased overall gut volume.
Shift from fiber fermentation towards digesting cooked food.
Enhanced capacity to support larger brains and higher activity levels.
Conclusion: Culture (cooking) directly supports physiological changes and adaptations.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Example: Lactose Tolerance
Observation: Most mammals lose the ability to digest lactose after weaning.
Key Point: Lactase persistence is a dominant Mendelian trait seen in certain populations.
Common in populations with historical dairy consumption (e.g., European, African, Middle Eastern, South Asian).
Virtually absent in other regions.
Cultural Influence: The domestication of animals leads to dairy consumption, introducing selection pressures that favor the mutation for lactase persistence.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Itan et al., 2010.
Cultural Group Selection Theory
Overview: Cultural traits can be selected based on group-level dynamics.
Implications:
Large-scale cooperation and shifting social norms (including behaviors, practices, and religions).
Variations in cultural traits among groups become inherited and can persist over time.
Different traits can lead to varied levels of success among cultural groups.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Smith, 2020, Evolutionary Human Sciences.
Ratchet Effect/Cumulative Cultural Evolution
Concept: Culture accumulates modifications over generations, akin to a ratchet that prevents backward movement.
Mechanism:
Unlike other species, humans exhibit the ratchet effect, enhancing cumulative cultural knowledge.
Requirements for the Effect:
High-fidelity transmission of information.
Cooperative sharing of knowledge and skills.
Consequences:
Leads to increased diversity and sophistication in cultural outputs (art, science, technology).
Culture is scaffolded through material artifacts, social organization, and cognitive capabilities.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; reference to Tomasello, 1999 and Heintz, 2013.
Shared Intentionality
Researcher: Michael Tomasello.
Definition: Intentionality allows for coordinating actions, goals, and mental states with others through shared understanding.
Human Capacity:
Unique social-cognitive skills that enable joint action and mutual understanding of goals.
Joint Intentionality: Working together towards shared goals.
Collective Intentionality: Higher level engagement, developing a “cultural common ground” (norms, rules, beliefs).
Cultural Ratchet Effect: Communities that engage in collective exploration improve their norms and practices with each generation.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; O’Madagain & Thomasello, 2021.
Cultural Attraction Theory/Epidemiology of Representations
Researcher: Dan Sperber.
Critical Response: Challenges traditional memetics, which emphasizes high-fidelity replication of cultural practices.
Cultural Transmission:
Discusses the notion of cultural representations with variation as attractors.
Minds have evolved domain-specific biases making certain cultural elements more memorable.
Causal Factors: Cognitive, affective, and motivational predispositions create “forces of attraction” in cultural representations.
Cultural Mutation: Variation and guided changes in the norms of cultural transmission are possible.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Buskell, 2017.
The Zone of Latent Solutions
Proposal: Understanding how cumulative know-how functions within societies.
The “grey zone”: Skills can prime the learning of additional skills (latent cultural traits) fostering emergent functionalities.
Cultural Networks:
Behaviors and traits can re-invent without direct procedural copying.
Bundled behaviors form stable cultural domains (e.g., hunting skills or cooking).
Communities: Serve as containers that replicate and evolve bundles of cultural traits.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Andersson & Tennie, 2023, Nature Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Cumulative Cultural Traits and Institutions
Mechanism: Interaction between learners and institutions results in the formation and perpetuation of cultural traits.
Dynamic Interaction: Traits within learner communities can give rise to institutions that exhibit functions.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Andersson & Tennie, 2023.
Network Theory
Theory A (Classical):
Depicted as a “ladder” where an increase in skills enhances cultural sophistication.
Driven by high-fidelity imitation.
Theory B (Proposed):
Represents a “web” or network image where reinforcement of latent skills occurs.
Proto-institutions bundle skills and adapt when groups split, maintaining the skillset across communities.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Andersson & Tennie, 2023.
Contemporary Examples of Network Theory
Trajectory A:
TikTok Dances: Success relies on precise copying and skill acquisition.
Food Cultures: Knowledge facilitated through skill-learning and recipe adherence.
Coding: Skills transmitted via tutorials and formal education.
Trajectory B:
TikTok Dances: Variation and improvisation are essential; relies on existing skills for successful execution.
Food Cultures: Persistence through experimentation rather than strict recipe adherence.
Coding: Skills dynamically circulate with evolving goals, allowing for reinvention.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Cultural Traits: Open-Endedness
Characteristics:
Cultural evolution involves cumulative changes and stability but isn't exclusive to humans.
Distinctiveness: Humans exhibit a greater capacity for heritable variation, allowing for the exploitation of new phenomena.
Adaptability: Traits can be recombined to address novel challenges.
Avoidance of Local Optima: Unlike other species, humans do not limit themselves to immediate best solutions.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026; Morgan & Feldman, 2024, Nature Human Behaviour.
Cultural Niche: Boyd's Perspective
Claim: Human success cannot be solely attributed to intelligence.
Cognitive Niche: Humans utilize “improvisational intelligence” to adapt culturally.
Cultural Niche: Emphasizes reliance on culturally transmitted skills and information for adaptation.
Gradual Improvement: It reinforces the necessity of cultural understanding alongside physical laws for population-level adaptations.
Counter to Dualism: Advocates that culture is intrinsically intertwined with human biology.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Cultural Niche: Selective Social Learning
Concept: Social learning functions as “information scrounging”, providing ease of access to learned information from others.
Evolution of Behavior: Humans have evolved to depend on societal imitation, particularly when learning individually becomes burdensome.
Understanding not Necessary: Knowledge of effectiveness suffices, even if the mechanics remain unclear.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Commonalities Between Theories of Cultural Evolution
Dynamic Cultures: Cultures operate under evolutionary processes.
Key Component: Social learning is central for cultural transmission.
Skills: This transmission is facilitated through cognitive abilities including mindreading and language.
Role of Cooperation: Distinctive sociality in humans enables cultural evolution.
Cognitive Interaction: Cognition closely intertwines with culture; understanding one necessitates consideration of the other.
Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.
Differences Between Theories of Cultural Evolution
Genetic Variation: The extent to which genetic factors explain similarities and differences within groups.
Units of Transmission: Differentiation between individual and group levels of trait transmission.
Fidelity of Transmission: Variability in how accurately cultural practices are transmitted.
E.g., ratchet theory correlates high-fidelity learning with better skills versus variation-focused theories that prioritize the essence of skills.
Focus on Aspects: Each theory emphasizes different phenomena within cultural evolution.
*Source: Elizaveta Solomonova, 2026.