Leases II: Assignment of Leasehold Interests
Assignment of Leasehold Interests
Introduction
- This module discusses the circumstances under which obligations between a landlord and tenant are enforceable against third parties.
- Focus is on express clauses in the lease agreement.
Terminology
- Lessor: Landlord (e.g., Rachel).
- Reversion: The landlord's interest.
- Lessee: Tenant (e.g., Toby).
- Leasehold Estate: The tenant's interest.
Assignment
- Transfer of the entire interest of the tenant or landlord.
- If a tenant assigns, the assignee replaces the original tenant.
- If a landlord assigns, the reversion is transferred.
Sublease
- Creates an additional, lesser leasehold estate.
- The original tenant becomes a sub-lessor (or sub-landlord).
- The sublease must be for a shorter period than the original (headlease).
Assignment of the Leasehold Estate: Example 1
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Express clause: Toby must pay rent.
- Toby doesn't pay rent for three months.
- Toby assigns the leasehold interest to Beth.
- Question: Is Beth liable for the unpaid rent?
Assignment of the Reversion: Example 1
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Rachel assigns the reversion to Bob.
- Toby fails to pay rent.
- Question: Can Bob enforce the covenant to pay rent against Toby?
Assignment of the Reversion: Example 2
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Rachel assigns the reversion to Bob.
- Rachel had covenanted to undertake improvements but hasn't.
- Question: Can Toby enforce the covenant against Bob?
Assignment of the Leasehold Estate: Example 2
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Express clause: Rachel will undertake certain improvements.
- Toby assigns the leasehold interest to Beth.
- Rachel hasn't made the improvements.
- Question: Can Beth require Rachel to make the improvements?
Covenants Against Assigning
- Absolute: Strictly construed.
- Qualified: Requires landlord's consent.
- Breaching the covenant does not automatically void the lease/assignment.
- The lease remains valid until the landlord elects to end it.
- Accepting rent can constitute consent.
Qualified Covenants
- If a clause is qualified, consent cannot be unreasonably withheld (CA ss 133B(1) and s 132).
- Test: JA McBeath Nominees.
- Considerations: Adverse effect on property interest, future letting, and whether a reasonable person would anticipate an adverse impact due to the transaction.
Enforceability of Covenants Against Third Parties
- Privity of Contract: Covenant enforceable as a matter of contract law between original parties. (CA s 70A(1))
- Privity of Estate: Covenant enforceable if it 'touches and concerns' the land.
Privity of Contract
- Lease as both a contract and an estate.
- Covenants enforceable between original parties based on contract law.
- Privity survives assignment.
- Parties remain bound by express (but not implied) covenants.
- Parties cannot escape contractual obligations through assignment.
Privity of Estate
- Derives from landlord/tenant relationship.
- In the absence of privity of contract, covenants are enforceable where there is privity of estate
- Requires that the covenant 'touches and concerns' the land (Rule in Spencer’s Case).
- Common law concept; applicability to equitable leases is uncertain.
Touch and Concern
- Covenant must relate to the land itself.
- Swift Investments criteria:
- Affects the nature, quality, value, or use of the land.
- Benefits the lessee or reversioner for the time being.
- Not of a personal nature.
- See also Gumland Property Holdings.
Examples of Covenants that Touch and Concern
- Paying rent.
- Repairing the property.
- Insuring against fire.
- Not assigning without consent.
- Renewing the lease.
- Using the property as residential.
RPA s 51: Leasehold Estate
- Section 51 of the Real Property Act overrides the "touch and concern" requirement in Spencer’s Case.
- Section 3(1)(a) defines 'transfer' to include a lease.
- If the transfer is registered, the assignee of the lessee is liable for all covenants in the original lease, as long as assignee remains the tenant
- Liability extends beyond covenants that merely 'touch and concern' the land (Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd).
Past Breaches: Tenant’s Breaches
- The assignee is generally liable only when the estate is vested in them.
- No liability for breaches prior to assignment.
- However, the assignee may be liable for continuing breaches (e.g., failure to repair, improper use of premises).
- The original tenant may remain liable due to privity of contract.
Right of Indemnity
- If the landlord sues the original tenant, the original tenant has a right of indemnity against the assignee who caused the breach.
- If the new tenant is liable for continuing breaches of the original tenant, the new tenant has a right of indemnity against the original tenant.
Assignment of the Leasehold Estate: Example 1 (Revisited)
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Express clause: Toby must pay rent.
- Toby doesn't pay rent for three months.
- Toby assigns the leasehold interest to Beth.
- Question: Is Beth liable for the unpaid rent?
Assignment of the Reversion
- CA section 117 (benefit of covenants).
- CA section 118 (burden of covenants).
- Subject matter of the lease = touch and concern
- Applies to both legal and equitable leases because rights rely on statute, not privity of estate.
RPA s 51 and ‘subject matter of the lease’
- Section 117 uses the phrase 'subject-matter of the lease'.
- Key question: Does RPA s 51 override the 'subject matter of the lease' requirement, similar to how it overrides the "touch and concern" requirement?
- Meaning, is 'subject-matter of the lease' unnecessary if assignment is registered??
- The answer to that question is maybe
Past Breaches: Landlord’s breaches
- If the landlord breaches and assigns the reversion, then s 118 will permit the tenant to sue where the breach is continuing.
- If the landlord breaches and the tenant assigns, then the assignee can sue for continuing breaches.
Assignment of the Reversion: Example 1 (Revisited)
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Rachel assigns the reversion to Bob.
- Toby fails to pay rent.
- Question: Can Bob enforce the covenant to pay rent against Toby?
Assignment of the Reversion: Example 2 (Revisited)
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Rachel assigns the reversion to Bob.
- Rachel had covenanted to undertake improvements but hasn't.
- Question: Can Toby enforce the covenant against Bob?
Assignment of the Leasehold interest: Example 2 (Revisited)
- Rachel (landlord) leases to Toby (tenant).
- Express clause: Rachel will undertake certain improvements.
- Toby assigns the leasehold interest to Beth.
- Rachel hasn't made the improvements.
- Question: Can Beth require Rachel to make the improvements?