Quantitative & Experimental Methods in Psychiatry – Comprehensive Study Notes

Page 1

  • Topic Introduction
    • Course/Chapter: 5 Quantitative and Experimental Methods in Psychiatry, Section 5.1 (Epidemiology)
    • Authors: Diana E. Clarke et al.
    • Epidemiology = study of how often disease occurs in populations, temporal changes, determinants.
    • Psychiatric epidemiology aligns with chronic‐disease models (vs. acute/infectious).
    • Stuart L. Morris’s 1957 “seven uses of epidemiology” provide framework (historical study, community diagnosis, health-service utilization, completing the clinical picture, identification of syndromes, assessing individual risks, identifying causes).

Page 2

  • Historical Study
    • Harder in psychiatry because of diagnostic changes (e.g., post-1970 DSM shifts); example: projected rise in Alzheimer disease due to ageing baby boomers.
  • Community Diagnosis
    • Describes health status of population and burden (reduced productivity, cost, premature mortality).
    • WHO Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project introduced.
  • Health-Service Utilization
    • Documents “de facto mental-health system” incl. primary care, social services, schools, alternative medicine.
    • Primary care is key worldwide—necessitates psychiatric knowledge among PCPs.

Page 3

  • Treatment Need Conceptual Problems
    • Unlike fractures/sepsis, psychiatric disorders sit on continuum; diagnostic thresholds fuzzy.
    • Subthreshold symptoms may still cause disability; spontaneous remission possible.
    • Hence “need for treatment” remains unresolved yet unmet need remains large.
  • Completing the Clinical Picture
    • Community studies capture natural history, prodrome, progression.
    • Clinical samples biased (Berkson bias) because treated cases tend to be more severe/comorbid.

Page 4

  • Identification of Syndromes
    • Pre-DSM-III categories poorly defined; categorical symptom-based system has limits.
    • DSM-5 added cross-cutting dimensional assessments.
    • NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) explores neuroscience-based dimensions.
    • Epidemiology clarifies prevalence + disability; high prevalence/low disability likely normal variants.
    • Example: high comorbidity among depression/anxiety/somatization.

Page 5

  • Assessing Individual Risks
    • Classic CVD analogy: cholesterol, hypertension, smoking.
    • Translation to individual psychiatric prevention still nascent though early treatment vital.
  • Identifying Causes
    • Psychiatric disorders multifactorial; gene-environment interplay (e.g., 5-HTTLPR × stress → depression).
  • Measures of Frequency: Prevalence Basics
    • Prevalence ratio needs: case definition, population, time.

Page 6

  • Prevalence Types
    • Point / 1-Month (used more in psychiatry).
    • 1-Year (useful for service planning).
    • Lifetime (for risk-factor research but recall bias).
    • Demographic shifts require standardization when comparing rates.

Page 7

  • Incidence Concepts
    • New events in a time frame.
    • Numerator: new cases; denominator excludes existing cases.
    • “First incidence” = first-ever cases.
    • Person-time denominators adjust for dynamic populations.
  • Relationship: P≈I×dP \approx I \times d
    • Prevalence reflects incidence + duration; therapies shortening duration lower prevalence; life-prolonging treatments can raise prevalence (e.g., AIDS post-HAART).
  • Comorbidity
    • Random vs. non-random co-occurrence; diagnostic artifacts (e.g., substance use in DSM-III ASPD).

Page 8

  • Effect & Association Metrics
    • Risk factor ↑ likelihood; protective ↓.
    • Web of causation; rare outcomes need large cohorts.
    • 2×2 table cells a,b,c,d.
    • Relative Risk (RR): RR=a/(a+b)c/(c+d)RR = \dfrac{a/(a+b)}{c/(c+d)}

Page 9

  • Odds Ratio (OR)
    • Used in case–control; cross-product OR=adbcOR = \dfrac{ad}{bc}.
    • Interpretation around 1.
  • Confounding
    • Factor associated with both exposure & outcome; adjust via stratification/regression.
  • Mediation vs. Moderation (Effect Modification)
    • Mediation: A explains path E→O.
    • Moderation: effect of E on O differs by levels of A; tested via interaction.
  • Attributable Fraction (AF)
    • Among exposed: AFe=RR−1RRAF_e = \frac{RR-1}{RR}
    • Population AF depends on exposure prevalence.

Page 10

  • Study Designs Overview
    • Experimental vs. Observational.
  • Experimental (Clinical Trials)
    • Efficacy trials (highly selected); Effectiveness trials (real-world).
    • Controlled, randomized, double-blind; ethical issues with placebos.
    • Prevention trials deal with incident cases; randomization sometimes infeasible (universal interventions).

Page 11

  • Observational Analytic Studies
    • Cohort: select by exposure, follow for outcome.
    • Case-control: select by outcome, measure past exposure; OR approximates RR.
  • Descriptive Studies
    • Cross-sectional, repeated cross-sectional, longitudinal; provide foundational prevalence/incidence data.

Page 12

  • Sampling Fundamentals
    • Sampling frame; representative sample.
    • Probability vs. Non-probability sampling.
    • Simple random; Stratified (↑precision).
    • Non-probability: convenience, consecutive, quota, snowball.

Page 13

  • Measurement
    • Instruments must match target population; caution with modifications.
    • Reliability
    • Test–retest; inter-rater (Cohen’s κ\kappa; ≥0.4 acceptable).
    • Validity
    • Content, Criterion (concurrent/predictive; sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV), Construct (Robins & Guze validators).

Page 14

  • Case Identification & DSM Evolution
    • Self-report + informants; no pathognomonic tests.
    • DSM-I (1952) & DSM-II unreliable; U.S.–U.K. study showed diagnostic variance.
    • DSM-III (1980) introduced operational criteria; subsequent revisions (DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-5, DSM-5-TR).

Page 15

  • ICD Relations & Harmonization
    • DSM-ICD linkage; ICD-11 (2019) aligned ~30% identical disorders with DSM-5.
  • Disability Classification
    • DSM definition includes distress/impairment.
    • WHO ICF (2001): Functioning & Disability framework (Body Functions, Activities/Participation, Environmental factors).

Page 16

  • Diagnostic Instruments – Adults
    • DIS (1978) for DSM-III; fully structured; paved way for ECA.
    • CIDI (WHO): global, computerized; UM-CIDI (NCS) modifications; WMH-CIDI (adds functioning, new disorders).
    • AUDADIS-5 (DSM-5) for substance + comorbid disorders.
    • SCID-5 (semi-structured; clinician-administered).

Page 17

  • Diagnostic Instruments – Children/Adolescents
    • DISC (lay interview; parent/child versions; DSM-5 update DISC-5).
    • CAPA & variants (interviewer-based judgment).
    • K-SADS-PL DSM-5.
  • Disability Scales
    • WHODAS 2.0 (36-item; 12-item short form).
    • CGAS / BIS for youth.

Page 18

  • Major Epidemiologic Surveys – Adults
    • ECA (1980s; 5 sites; DSM-III DIS) ➔ comorbidity, unmet need.
    • NCS (1990-92; UM-CIDI) & NCS-R (2001-03); higher prevalence partly due to methods.
    • NSDUH (annual household; DSM-IV/5; 2019 data: 50k interviews).
    • WMH Initiative (29 countries; WMH-CIDI) ➔ cross-national prevalence range.
    • NESARC (NLAES, NESARC-I/II/III; AUDADIS).

Page 19

  • Surveys – Youth
    • MECA study (methods, DISC reliability).
    • NCS-A (2001-04; 13-17 yrs): 1-year any disorder 40.2%.
    • YRBSS (behaviors; 4.9 million students since 1991).
    • NSCH & other CDC surveys provide mental-health modules.

Page 20

  • Global Burden of Disease (GBD)
    • DALY = YLL+YLDYLL + YLD (years life lost + years lived disabled).
    • Mental disorders ≈5% of total DALYs (depression > anxiety > SUD> schizophrenia).
    • Trends 1990-2019: rising DALYs for mental disorders except alcohol use.

Page 21

  • Emerging Issue: COVID-19 Mental-Health Impact
    • ↑ prevalence of depression, anxiety, eating-disorder pathology, burnout, PTSD, violence.
    • Risk factors: frontline worker stress, sleep disturbance, loneliness.
    • Protective: structured routines, nature, healthy sleep, limited news exposure.

Page 22 (Section 5.2 Statistics & Experimental Design)**

  • Why Psychiatrists Need Stats
    • Critical appraisal beyond abstracts; statistics = lingua franca.
  • Basics Refresher
    • Probability, sample space, random variable, PDF/CDF, mean, median, variance.
    • Independence & conditional probability; P(X∣Y)=P(X)P(X|Y)=P(X) if independent.

Page 23

  • Estimation
    • Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE).
    • Properties: unbiasedness, consistency, efficiency.
    • Confidence Interval (CI): P[a≤ϕ≤b]=cP[a\le\phi\le b]=c (frequentist interpretation).

Page 24

  • Hypothesis Testing
    • Null vs. Alternative; type I (α\alpha), type II (β\beta), power (1−β)(1-\beta).
    • P value = probability (under null) of observing statistic ≥ extreme as seen.
    • Multiple testing ➔ Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER); Bonferroni, Sidak, Holm step-down, Hochberg step-up, closed testing, min-test.
    • False Discovery Rate (FDR) controls expected proportion false positives (e.g., Benjamini–Hochberg).

Page 25

  • Bayesian Approach
    • Bayes theorem: P(ϕ∣x)=f(x∣ϕ)P(ϕ)∫f(x∣θ)P(θ)dθP(\phi|x)=\dfrac{f(x|\phi)P(\phi)}{\int f(x|\theta)P(\theta)d\theta}.
    • Prior (subjective/objective), Posterior distribution; conjugate priors facilitate updating.

Page 26

  • Causality & Randomization
    • Potential outcome framework (Rubin): each subject has O<em>T,O</em>PO<em>T, O</em>P; causal effect E(O<em>T−O</em>P)E(O<em>T-O</em>P).
    • Random assignment ensures E(O<em>T∣T)−E(O</em>P∣P)=E(O<em>T−O</em>P)E(O<em>T|T)-E(O</em>P|P)=E(O<em>T-O</em>P).
  • Matching & Propensity Scores
    • When randomization infeasible; estimate probability of treatment assignment, match / stratify on propensity.

Page 27

  • Randomization Tests & Rank-based variants
    • Permutation of labels to derive exact sampling distribution; compute P value.
  • Likely Responder Analysis
    • Identify responder subgroup first, then test; uses potential outcome & propensity methods.

Page 28

  • Handling Missing Data
    • Mechanisms: MCAR, MAR, Non-ignorable.
    • Simple deletions vs. imputation (mean substitution, hot-deck, multiple imputation, EM algorithm, model-based).
    • Longitudinal → LOCF cautions; HLM / mixed models better.
    • Pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable missingness.

Page 29

  • Regression & Classification
    • Linear regression assumptions; OLS vs. MLE.
    • Logistic regression: log⁡p1−p=β0+βx\log\frac{p}{1-p}=\beta_0+\beta x.
    • Machine Learning: CART, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines; ROC & AUC.

Page 30

  • Contingency Tables & Log-Linear Models
    • Chi-square, CMH test, Breslow–Day for homogeneity of ORs.
    • GLM unifies regression for exponential family; link functions.

Page 31

  • Longitudinal Models
    • Repeated measures ANOVA limitations.
    • Mixed/HLM models (random effects, flexible covariance).
    • Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).
    • Latent Class Growth Analysis & Growth Mixture Modeling uncover trajectory subtypes.

Page 32

  • Survival Analysis
    • Kaplan–Meier, hazards, log-rank test.
    • Cox proportional hazards model: h(t∣x)=h0(t)exp⁡(βx)h(t|x)=h_0(t)\exp(\beta x).
    • Cure models for mixed susceptible/non-susceptible populations.

Page 33

  • Study Design Considerations
    • Experimental design optimality; example: crossover trials, carry-over effect, AB/BA vs. extended designs.

Page 34

  • Efficacy vs. Effectiveness vs. Cost-Effectiveness
    • Efficacy trials = controlled conditions; Effectiveness = real-world.
    • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)
    • Program P=(ε,γ)P=(\varepsilon, \gamma).
    • CER =γ/ε=\gamma/\varepsilon; ICER =(Δγ)/(Δε)=(\Delta \gamma)/(\Delta \varepsilon).
    • Net Health Benefit NHB<em>k(λ)=ε</em>k−γk/λNHB<em>k(\lambda)=\varepsilon</em>k-\gamma_k/\lambda.
    • Decision rules under fixed budget or WTP threshold λ\lambda.
    • Statistical CEA: bootstrapping, CIs for ICER, CMCB, Bayesian NHB.

Page 35

  • Key Take-Home Messages
    • Understanding epidemiologic measures, statistical designs, and analytic methods is essential for modern psychiatric research.
    • Proper case definition, sampling, measurement reliability/validity, and handling of missing data safeguard inference.
    • Multiple sophisticated tools—Bayesian methods, machine learning, hierarchical models—expand capability but necessitate rigorous validation.