Jackie Leach Scully
Jackie Leach Scully – “Disablism in a Time of Pandemic”
1. Why does Scully argue maximizing benefit is discriminatory?
Scully critiques the maximization of benefit approach because it often embeds disablist assumptions. By focusing solely on clinical outcomes, this framework:
Assumes that people with disabilities inherently have worse prognoses, which is not always accurate.
Disregards the diversity and complexity of disabilities, leading to unfair exclusion of disabled individuals from critical care.
Reinforces societal biases that devalue the lives of disabled people based on assumptions about their quality of life or utility.
2. What are the three disablist assumptions and how do they impact rationing protocols?
Assumption 1: Disability Equals Poor Health:
Many protocols use disability as a proxy for poor health or reduced recovery likelihood, even when disability has no impact on health outcomes (e.g., people with visual or hearing impairments).
This leads to unfair exclusion of disabled individuals from care.
Assumption 2: Disabled People Have Poor Quality of Life:
Societal biases often perceive disabled lives as inherently less valuable or enjoyable.
These assumptions influence decision-making, leading to rationing protocols that implicitly prioritize individuals without disabilities.
Assumption 3: Social Utility Determines Value:
Protocols sometimes prioritize individuals based on perceived societal contributions, marginalizing disabled people who are wrongly deemed less "useful."
Scully argues that this approach dangerously shifts criteria away from clinical outcomes to societal worth, reinforcing systemic discrimination.
3. On what grounds do Emanuel et al. and Scully disagree?
Emanuel et al.:
Advocate for maximizing benefits by prioritizing patients who are most likely to survive and have the longest post-treatment life expectancy.
Emphasize instrumental value, such as prioritizing healthcare workers who play critical roles in the pandemic response.
Scully:
Critiques this utilitarian approach for embedding discriminatory biases against disabled people.
Argues that focusing on maximizing benefits disproportionately disadvantages individuals with disabilities by failing to consider their unique health profiles and lived experiences.
Emphasizes equality and individualized assessment over utilitarian frameworks.
Relevant Terms:
Disablism: Prejudice or discrimination against disabled people, often based on stereotypes or assumptions about their abilities, quality of life, or value to society.
Maximization of Benefits: An ethical approach aiming to save the most lives or life-years, often used in triage settings during resource scarcity.
Social Utility: The perceived societal value or contribution of an individual, used as a basis for prioritizing access to scarce resources.