Study Notes on Contract Performance, Breach, and Remedies
Chapter 13: Contract Performance, Breach, and Remedies
Introduction to Contract Performance and Breach
Relevant Text: Cross/Miller, The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, Eleventh Edition (2021).
Copyright Notice: © 2021 Cengage. All Rights Reserved.
Content Overview: This chapter discusses the essential aspects of contract performance, conditions of breach, types of remedies available, and the implications of voluntary consent.
Voluntary Consent in Contracts
Definition: Voluntary consent refers to the agreement of both parties to enter into a contract without coercion or undue pressure.
Lacking Voluntary Consent: A valid contract may become unenforceable if voluntary consent is absent. Reasons for lacking voluntary consent include:
Mistake
Misrepresentation
Undue Influence
Duress
Types of Mistakes in Contracts
Mistakes Defined: In the context of contracts, mistakes refer to incorrect beliefs shared by parties concerning a significant fact.
Mistake of Fact: These are mistakes that can make a contract voidable. Examples include both unilateral and bilateral mistakes.
Unilateral Mistakes: These occur when one party is mistaken about a foundational fact, which generally does not justify rescinding a contract.
Bilateral Mistakes: When both parties are mistaken, either can rescind the contract.
Mistake of Quality or Value: Mistakes about the quality or value of a subject matter normally do not make a contract voidable, as they do not impact the enforceability of agreements.
Case Studies and Hypothetical Scenarios
Question #1: Misrepresentation but not mistakes can lead to a lack of voluntary consent.
Question #2: Scenario with Nora and Oceanic Transport:
Situation: Oceanic makes an error in calculating shipping costs, resulting in a contract price that is $1,000 less than actual costs.
Outcomes: Generally, a court would allow the parties to rescind the contract.
Question #3: Byron sells a parcel land believed to be worthless, which actually contains gold:
Potential Actions: Byron cannot rescind the contract and cannot claim fraud/mistake. This highlights the significance of understanding contractual obligations despite personal beliefs about value.
Question #4: Duress can be a defense against contract enforcement but is not grounds for rescission.
Understanding Duress
Duress Definition: Involves pressure exerted on a party to secure their agreement to a contract against their will.
Key Elements:
The party must prove that they entered into a contract under fear or threat.
The act that caused the threat must be wrongful or illegal.
This renders the party incapable of exercising free will in making the agreement.
Proof of such threat must indicate it concerns something the threatening party has no right to enforce.
Damages for Breach of Contract
Compensatory Damages: Damages designed to compensate the injured party for losses directly caused by the breach.
Objective: Courts aim to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed: “make the person whole.”
Types of Damages:
Compensatory Damages: Specific monetary compensation to cover losses.
Consequential Damages: Additional losses incurred as a result of the breach, considering special circumstances.
Punitive Damages: Designed to punish the breaching party and deter similar conduct in the future.
Nominal Damages: A small sum awarded when a breach has occurred without substantial loss.
Compensatory Damages Elaboration:
They compensate only for actual damages sustained as a direct result of the breach, demonstrating a critical aspect of contract law: parties are entitled to expect to receive what they bargained for.
Consequential (Special) Damages Elaboration:
Foreseeable damages that arise from special circumstances beyond the immediate terms of the contract.
These damages must be within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made, making them pivotal in determining overall contract enforceability and liability.