Study Notes on AI and Themes of Nursing Representation
Artificial Intelligence and Images Portraying Nurses Through the Decades
Authors
Janet Reed, PhD, RN, CMSRN
Tracy M. Dodson, PhD, RN
Amy B. Petrinec, PhD, RN
Delaney Tennant, BSN graduate
Jenna Chmelik, BSN, RN
Shawnna Cripple, BSN graduate
Published on May 31, 2025
DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol30No02Man05
Abstract
The public image of nursing is affected by outdated stereotypes.
Rapid advancement of AI technologies has potential to reshape perceptions.
Study examines 288 GAI images of nurses using quantitative content analysis.
Key Findings
Significant Differences Noted: Between three image generators regarding:
Gender representation
Ethnic diversity
Sexualization of images
Highlighted need for critical evaluation of AI imagery to combat biases and stereotypes.
Introduction
Despite being the most trusted healthcare profession, nursing faces outdated perceptions.
Nurses have transitioned from a marginalized role to skilled professionals with autonomous responsibilities.
Persistent stereotypes in media continue to undermine the profession, e.g., “angel in white,” “naughty nurse.”
Negative portrayals are linked to recruitment challenges and patient harm.
Historical Context
Origins of Modern Nursing:
Rooted in religious service and military care.
19th-century shift away from undesirability to recognition via Florence Nightingale's contributions.
Media portrayals throughout history have perpetuated harmful stereotypes.
Portrayals of Nurses
Common stereotypes include:
Nurse as the doctor's handmaiden
Ministering angel
Battle-ax character
Appearances in media affecting public perception:
Films and shows such as MAS*H and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.
Negative effects on recruitment and job satisfaction.
The Naughty Nurse Stereotype
The sexualization of nurses is widespread.
Represents nurses as sexual objects rather than competent professionals.
Roots in 1950s/60s media and persists in modern culture.
Research Methodology
Aim
To systematically analyze AI-generated images of nurses across history.
Literature Review
Databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Google Scholar.
Search terms focused on public image and stereotypes of nursing.
Methods
Study Design: Non-human research approval; utilized quantitative content analysis.
Generated a dataset of 288 images using three platforms (Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, ImageFx).
Analyzed images across decades with standardized prompts.
Analysis
Coding Scheme
Developed a coding scheme for systematic analysis.
Variables Included:
Gender
Ethnicity
Professionalism
Sexualization
Context and realism of images
Interrater reliability tested with 90.8% agreement on coding.
Results Overview
RQ1: Visual Elements in Generative AI Images
Ethnicity Representation:
83% light skin tone
9.4% dark skin tone
3.1% Asian
4.5% mixed/medium tone
Gender Representation:
86.5% female nurses
13.5% male nurses
Facial Expressions:
37.8% happy
59.3% serious
Sexualization:
28.8% depicted the “Naughty Nurse” stereotype;
7% classified as unprofessional due to oversexualization.
Common Objects:
44.8% included stethoscopes (28.5% were unrealistic).
RQ2: Gender and Race Representation Across Image Generators
Statistically significant differences found among platforms:
Gender Diversity: Adobe (61.5%), Midjourney (100%), ImageFx (97.9%).
Ethnic Diversity: Adobe (28.2% non-White), Midjourney (1.1%), ImageFx (11.7%).
Sexualization Rate: Midjourney (52.1%), Adobe (16.7%), ImageFx (17.7%).
Discussion
Implications of Findings:
Reinforcement of outdated gender roles can deter male entrants into nursing.
Unrealistic beauty standards presented in AI images perpetuate detrimental stereotypes.
Future Recommendations:
Focus on promoting accuracy and diversity in nursing imagery to enhance recruitment.
Utilize specific prompts in GAI to create more inclusive representations.
Conclusion
AI-generated images perpetuate implicit biases and stereotypes in nursing.
Highlighting racial and gender diversity is crucial for improving the public image of nursing.
Moving towards an accurate representation is vital for recruitment and representation within the profession.
Authors' Backgrounds
Janet Reed specializes in medical-surgical nursing with research on technology in nursing education.
Tracy M. Dodson focuses on education technologies and nursing curricula.
Amy B. Petrinec is engaged in research related to caregiver outcomes in nursing.
Delaney Tennant participated as a research assistant; Jenna Chmelik studies to become a nurse educator; Shawnna Cripple contributed in similar capacities.
References
Continue to use cited works (2023, 2024) related to the topics and findings of this study, exploring the impact of stereotypes on perception and the roles of nurses in society.