Research Types and Processes
Introduction to Research
Module Overview
- This module covers:
- Defining different types of research and describing the research process.
- Providing an overview of the main components of a research proposal.
- Addressing writing a literature review.
Defining Research
- Research is defined as the systematic process of discovery.
- The OECD defines research as creative and systematic work to increase knowledge, including knowledge of humankind, culture, and society, and to devise new applications of available knowledge.
- Research aims to:
- Solve problems.
- Develop better processes or policies.
- Develop new applications or technologies.
- Treat diseases.
- Research is ongoing, cyclical, and expands our knowledge base.
- A key component of research is that it must be shared to build on existing knowledge.
Types of Research
Basic Research
- Experimental and theoretical work to acquire new knowledge of the underlying foundation of phenomena.
- Gathers observable facts without any particular application in mind.
- Fundamental to curiosity about how the world works.
- Does not have immediate practical application but can lead to later applications.
- The primary purpose is the generation of information that leads to theory and the testing of hypotheses generated by theory, such that the theory is refined.
- Examples:
- Research in human biology, biology, physiology, and neuroscience addressing mechanisms that underlie human formation and function.
Applied Research
- Original investigation to acquire new knowledge directed towards a specific or practical aim or objective.
- Aimed at the development of something.
- The creation of knowledge and/or the application does not, in itself, lead to implementation and practice.
- Knowledge application must be translated into changes in practice or policy.
Translational Research
- Translates findings from controlled trials (e.g., medical interventions) into real-world community or health settings.
- Examples:
- Research in sports science, exercise, and health testing the effectiveness of studies to see if an intervention's efficacy works under real-world conditions.
- Scalability studies aimed at how well an intervention can be embedded into a broader health system or policy.
The Research Process
- Research starts with an observation leading to questions:
- What is the cause?
- Why does this happen?
- How does that work?
- Answers to these questions are formally stated as a problem.
- The principal problem is often divided into smaller problems, specific questions, or hypotheses.
- A hypothesis is an educated speculation as to the answer to the question.
- Hypothesis requirements:
- Consistent with what is currently known.
- Capable of being tested and possibly falsified by evidence.
- A researcher needs to generate a plan to test hypotheses or answer questions.
- The research design should be appropriate for the specific question.
- The research process is often helical:
- Some research plans may not be practical due to cost or ethical issues, leading to modifications of the research questions or hypothesis.
- Assumptions need to be stated, which are conditions that are taken for granted.
- Data is collected and can be in many forms (events, numerical values, observations).
- Data itself is meaningless until it is assembled and interpreted in light of existing knowledge and assumptions.
- The discovery and meaning of data constitute research.
- Data either partially or completely answers the research question, but often poses new questions, making the research process a cycle.
Primary vs. Secondary Research
Primary Research
- Involves new research to answer specific questions or issues.
- Involves the collection and/or analysis of new data.
- Data can be acquired through experiments, observational studies, fieldwork, primary document analysis, and other methodologies.
- Can be prospective or retrospective.
Secondary Research
- Summarizes and interprets what is already known.
- Common methodologies involve systematic reviews aimed at finding and assessing all high-quality studies addressing a particular question.
- Synthesizes what is known from other forms of research (primary research studies) to provide a summary of what is already known.
- Meta-analyses are common in biomedical research.
- Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to combine results of individual studies.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methodology
Quantitative Methodology
- Involves the collection and analysis of numerical data (counts, measures, scores).
- Describes numerical changes in data (over time, between groups, in response to an intervention).
- Uses statistics to test whether observed changes or differences are likely to be true changes or differences, or whether they are chance findings.
Qualitative Methodology
- Uses non-numerical forms of data derived from interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts.
- Useful for learning about social processes, concepts, ascribing meanings to symbols, and describing the experiences of events and places.
- Growing recognition of the importance of qualitative research methodologies to understand experiences, particularly in health-related research.
Study Designs
Observational Studies
- Studies that do not involve any intervention or experiment.
Experimental Research
- Studies that involve the manipulation of the factor under study and randomization of subjects to treatments or exposure groups.
- Can identify cause and effect.
Descriptive Designs
- Studies that describe a phenomenon or make observations about something, about which we can possibly then ask questions and generate hypotheses.
- Does not involve analysis.
Analytic Designs
- Aim to test hypotheses.
- Observational designs indicate relationships between variables.
- Experimental designs are required to determine causality.
Strength of Evidence for Causality
- Descriptive studies indicate that a phenomenon exists.
- Observational studies identify whether there is a relationship between different variables.
- Experimental studies test whether one factor leads to a change in another factor, indicating the direction of causality.