Criminological Theory: Labeling Theory Summary
Chapter Objectives
Link between societal reaction and labeling.
Distinction of Lemert’s primary and secondary deviance.
Explanation of retrospective interpretation.
Definition of master status and its implications for rehabilitation.
Description of labeling as both a conflict and a process theory.
Essential Elements of Labeling Theory
Also known as the Societal Reaction School, developed in the 1960s.
Deviance is attributed by reactions to behavior rather than the behavior itself.
Focuses solely on societal reactions, not motivations for deviant behavior.
Social and Intellectual Heritage
Influenced by civil rights movements and skepticism toward government.
Rooted in the Chicago School's symbolic interactionism and self-report methodologies.
Assumptions of Labeling Perspective
Crime and criminals are defined by societal labels.
Labels influence societal perceptions and treatment of deviant behavior.
Stigma plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of the labeling process.
Two Forms of Labeling Theory
Original version: focus on how and to whom labels are applied.
Secondary deviance: examines the impact of labels on individual behavior and identity.
Lemert’s Views on Deviance
Primary deviance: initial acts not significantly regarded by the actor.
Secondary deviance: behavior shaped by the internalization of a deviant label, changing self-concept.
Retrospective Interpretation
Process where society re-evaluates past behaviors upon labeling, fitting them into deviant narratives.
Master Status Concept
Dominant labels that overshadow all other qualities, affecting social identity and rehabilitation efforts.
Policy Implications of Labeling
Diversion: aims to reduce stigma.
Due Process: seeks to minimize differential processing in the justice system.
Decriminalization and deinstitutionalization approaches reduce labeling and consequences for individuals.
Key Chapter Summary Points
Deviance is a product of societal reaction rather than inherent behavior.
The labeled individual is often seen primarily through the lens of their label.
Acceptance of a deviant label can lead to a change in self-concept and further deviance.