lecture
a deontological theory is act-focused » evaluates actions
non-consequential
uses the concept of moral duty n obligation, as its central idea
divine command theory
certain actions are morally correct/forbidden because God commands so
‘an act X is wrong if and only if God forbids act X’
and vice versa
» ‘X is wrong ⬅➡ God forbids act X’
biconditional
which side is more fundamental for the other to be true? » euthyphro’s dilemma (Plato)
something is pious ⬅➡ the gods love it » do the gods love it because it’s pious or vice versa = euthyphro’s dilemma
God’s decision on actions is what makes them right/wrong
shorthand
1. biconditional is true
2. God’s commands create moral facts
potential problems
the problem of reversal of values
instance 1 » murder is wrong
instance 2 » murder is right (eg Abraham and Isaac)
arbitrariness
does any moral truth have any objective value, as God could have chosen one which way or the other ie He could easily have said that loving your neighbour is wrong » eg like flipping a moral coin
infantilism
DivCommT robs of us of the chance to develop morally
morally stagnant, like toddlers
praising God
seems an inadequate grounds for praise, if we are praising Him for sticking to His own commands
Robert Adams
1. facts about right/wrong or good/bad
2. loving God
natural law theory
in simple: find out what’s natural » do what’s natural » avoid what’s unnatural
eg Roman Catholic Church on contraception
“humanae vitae” (Paul VI, 1968)
procreative
unitive
objections
Hume’s ‘Is-Ought’ gap
Thomistic natural law
“do good and avoid evil”
goods:
life
knowledge
society
procreation
modification:
1. moral principle = “you ought”
2. P is good
∴ do P
thus you cannot apply the is-ought gap to Aquinas’ modified natural law
new natural law theorists
grizez
finnis
joseph boyle
basic human goods:
life
knowledge
play
aesthetic experience
friendship
marriage
religion
practical reasonableness
these can’t be broken down and are the fundamental parts of human wellbeing