Documents Rolling Summative

Declaration of Independence

  • How it can be used in the argument FRQ

    • It can be used to explain and defend the founding principles of what a democratic government should be and what values it should govern by

  • Explain two of the five democratic ideals that are found in the Declaration of Independence

    • 1 = Natural rights, meaning the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness should be guaranteed to all citizens of the US

    • 2 = Social contract, meaning that if the government is no longer serving the people’s rights and needs, the people have the right to overthrow the government

Articles of Confederation

  • How it can be used in the argument FRQ

    • It can be used to explain the need for a strong federal government by showing the effects of a weak one

  • Explain two specific weaknesses that it created and why each caused a problem

    • 1 = The Articles of confederation made it illegal for the federal government to collect taxes, making the country unable to pay back its debts or start new projects

    • 2 = The articles of Confederation made it illegal for the federal government to have a military which made the US vulnerable to foreign invasions or rebellions such as Shay’s rebellion

Brutus 1

  • How can it be used in the argument FRQ

    • It can be used to argue for a stronger state government rather than a stronger federal government

  • Explain two concepts of how government should be structured

    • 1= Brutus 1 argued that individual states knew the needs of their citizen’s better, as they were closer and more affected by the prosperity of the citizens

    • 2 = Brutus 1 also argued that individual states knew the needs of their states best as far as policy and funding, as they are closer to that region of the nation

Federalist #10

  • How can it be used in the argument FRQ

    • Federalist #10 argues that a strong centralized government is best at controlling interest groups (factions)

  • Explain two concepts of how the government should be structured

    • 1 = It argues that factions will form because of the large population and that the only way to ensure that no one group gained too much power, on a strong central was needed

    • 2 = It also argues that by having state governments with oversight from the federal government, uniform policy ensures a unified nation with accurate views on what individual states needed

Federalist #51

  • How it can be used in the argument FRQ

    • Federalist #51 argues that having built-in checks and separation for each branch ensures no one branch has too much power

  • Explain two concepts of how the government should be structured

    • 1= It establishes that separation of powers, having the legislative branch create the laws, the executive enforces them and the judiciary branch interpret them that not any branch has too much power

    • 2 = It also established that checks and balances help to regulate each branch, for example, the presidential veto power helps to ensure that Congress does not get too much power

Federalist #70

  • How it can be used in the argument FRQ

    • Federalist #78 argues that a strong executive is vital for a democratic government

  • Explain two concepts in support of why this document was written

    • 1 = One element of this document establishes that a string executive figure is needed because they can make decisions very quickly in times of crisis

    • 2 = Another thing Federalist #70 establishes is that one string executive ensures that decisions are made effectively, as groups of people don’t have to discuss it.

Federlist #78

  • How can it be used in the argument FRQ

    • Federalist #78 argues the need for INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY

  • Explain two concepts in support of why this document was written

    • 1 = One element of this document is that a judiciary branch is not influenced by parties or public opinions and is instead focused on the law. This is helped by the lifetime terms.

    • 2 = Another element is that the judiciary has the power to declare laws made by congress unconstitutional which is an additional check