Operant Conditioning Notes Chpt. 6 E2
Chapter 6: Operant Conditioning: Introduction
Chapter Outline
- Positive Punishment
- Negative Punishment
- Positive Reinforcement: Further Distinctions
- Immediate Versus Delayed Reinforcement
- Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
- Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reinforcement
- Natural and Contrived Reinforcers
- Shaping
6.1 Historical Background
- Thorndike’s Law of Effect
- Skinner’s Selection by Consequences
6.2 Operant Conditioning
- Operant Behavior
- Operant Consequences: Reinforcers and Punishers
- Operant Antecedents: Discriminative Stimuli
6.3 Four Types of Contingencies
- Positive Reinforcement
- Negative Reinforcement
- Positive Punishment
- Negative Punishment
Learning Objectives
- 6-1 Distinguish between operant (instrumental) conditioning and classical conditioning.
- 6-2 Describe Thorndike’s law of effect and his classic experiment that led to its creation.
- 6-3 Describe Skinner’s approach to operant conditioning, including his emphasis on observable behavior.
- 6-4 Define operant behavior, reinforcers, and punishers.
- 6-5 Explain the role of discriminative stimuli within the three-term contingency, including contingencies of extinction.
- 6-6 Describe and distinguish among the four types of operant contingencies.
- 6-7 Describe the different types of reinforcement, including primary/secondary, immediate/delayed, intrinsic/extrinsic, and natural/contrived reinforcement.
- 6-8 Describe shaping procedures, including situations that require shaping.
Introduction to Operant Conditioning
- Elicited behavior is controlled by preceding stimuli (classical conditioning).
- Example: Tone: Food → Salivation; Tone → Salivation.
- The target response occurs at the end of the sequence.
- The preceding stimulus is sufficient to elicit the response, making it reflexive.
- Operant behaviors are motivated by a consequence and influence the environment to produce a consequence.
- Also called instrumental conditioning because the response is instrumental in producing the consequence.
- Operant behaviors are influenced by their consequences.
- Elicited behavior is a function of what precedes it; operant behavior is a function of what follows it.
- Another name for operant conditioning is instrumental conditioning.
6.1 Historical Background
- Operant conditioning has been used for thousands of years but was not scientifically analyzed until the 1890s by Edwin L. Thorndike.
Thorndike’s Law of Effect
- Thorndike studied animal intelligence, particularly cats in puzzle boxes.
- Hungry cats were enclosed in a puzzle box with food outside; they had to learn to escape (e.g., by stepping on a treadle to open a gate).
- Initially, the cat would accidentally step on the treadle, and over repeated trials, the cat would learn to escape the box more quickly but there was no ''flash of insight''.
- Responses that worked (stepping on the treadle) were gradually strengthened, while those that did not work (clawing, chewing) were gradually weakened.
- Thorndike's law of effect states that behaviors leading to a satisfying state of affairs are strengthened (