Metals in Biology – Exam Review Notes
Methane‐Oxidizing Bacteria, Hot Springs & Environmental Relevance
• Thermophilic springs (e.g. Bath, England) harbor Methylococcus sp. → convert atmospheric →
• Tourism/“healing” waters: bacterial bio-film removes skin irritants; compared to “holy water.”
• Bioremediation: Exxon Valdez (1989), Prince William Sound – inoculation with “oil-eating” Methylococcus restored coastline; MMO enzymes degrade long-chain hydrocarbons.
Soluble Methane Mono-Oxygenase (sMMO)
• Protein complex: reductase + regulatory + hydroxylase (MMOH).
• Active core (MMOH) = di-iron center bridged by O/Carboxylates:
• Fe1: 2 Glu + 1 His
• Fe2: 1 Glu + 1 His + H$_2$O
• Resting state: .
• Crystal shows unsym. di-iron but cooperative redox.
Catalytic Cycle (canonical mechanism)
superoxo (P$^$).
Second e$^-$ → (P) – λ${max}$ 720 nm.
scission → Q: – λ${max}$ 420 nm; EPR silent; Mössbauer mm s$^{-1}$.
H-atom abstraction + OH rebound: ; cluster returns , then re-reduced.
Revised Mechanistic Nuances
• Alternative: P hydroxylates substrate directly; or Q forms transient (oxo–hydroxo) before rebound.
• Spectroscopically distinct intermediates allow stopped-flow trapping.
Kinetics – Double-Mix Stopped-Flow
• Drive 1: (pump 1) → build P or Q (30–500 ms). • Drive 2: inject substrate (pump 2). • Monitor 720 nm (P) or 420 nm (Q). • Pseudo-first-order plot vs. [substrate] → slope = .
Kinetic Isotope Effects (KIE)
• CH$4$ vs. CD$4$: → C–H scission rate-limiting; tunnelling indicated.
• C$2$H$6$/C$2$D$6$: KIE ≈ 1 → diffusion/binding, not C–H cleavage, limits rate.
• Class I substrates (high KIE > 7): – H-atom abstraction RDS.
• Class II (KIE ≈ 1): – substrate access RDS.
Radical vs. Concerted Pathways
• DFT (Lippard, Maiti):
• TS1 (C–H break, O–H form) kcal mol$^{-1}$.
• Radical rebound favored: → (low barrier).
• Concerted “hydroxylation/transfer” ~3–5 kcal higher.
Oxygen Evolving Complex (PS II)
• Photosynthetic at thylakoid lumen.
• Cluster: (distorted chair) + ligating Asp/Glu/His; updated XFEL models minimize X-ray damage.
Kok Cycle (light-driven)
• Each ⇒ 1 e$^{-}$ removed (multi-step PCET). • Proposed oxidation states: – S$0$: or – S$3$: predominantly – S$4$: transient oxo ready for O–O coupling.
O–O Bond Formation Models
Nuc‐Electro attacks terminal (oxyl).
Bridging couples with (radical oxo–hydroxo).
• EXAFS: Mn–Mn 2.7 Å contractions in S$_3$; FTIR/EPR multiline support mixed-valent allocations.
Metal Ion Pumps & Channels
Energy-Driven Pumps (Active Transport)
• Na$^+$/K$^+$-ATPase: 3 Na$^+$ out / 2 K$^+$ in per ; Asp-P intermediate.
• Ca$^{2+}$-ATPase: cytosolic Ca$^{2+}$ extruded via Asp-351-P cycle.
Passive Channels (Facilitated Diffusion)
• K$^+$ channel (KcsA prototype) – selectivity filter TVGYG narrows to 3 Å.
• Selectivity:
– Large ions (Rb$^+$, Cs$^+$) excluded sterically.
– Small ions (Na$^+$, Li$^+$) retain hydration shell; desolvation (Na$^+$ −99 kcal mol$^{-1}$) too high vs. coordination to backbone carbonyls; K$^+$ (−80 kcal mol$^{-1}$) optimally balanced.
• Rapid flux: multi-ion knock-on mechanism – electrostatic repulsion accelerates throughput.
Oxygen Transport Proteins
Hemoglobin / Myoglobin (heme Fe)
• (high-spin) out-of-plane; O$2$ binding → low-spin; resonance Raman \tilde{\/\nu}{O–O}=1105 cm$^{-1}$. • Cooperativity in Hb (sigmoidal vs. ); single-site binding in Mb.
• Synthetic mimics: picket-fence porphyrin, capped porphyrins – block dimeric \mu$-O/OH formation.
Hemerythrin (di-Fe, non-heme)
• Differential His ligation (3 His + bridges vs. 2 His).
• O$2$ reduction: (peroxo-hydroxo); Raman \tilde{\/\nu}_{O–O}=844 cm$^{-1}$.
• Synthetic 3N/2N di-iron complexes replicate spectra & reversibility.
Hemocyanin (di-Cu)
• Tris-His (colourless) → (blue) \tilde{\/\nu}{O–O}=750 cm$^{-1}$.
• Same core serves in Tyrosinase for ortho-hydroxylation (cresolase/catecholase) when phenol substrate present.
Copper–Dioxygen Reactivity (Synthetic & Enzymatic)
Dinuclear Motifs
• Tetradentate ligands → end-on (nucleophilic).
• Tridentate → side-on (electrophilic).
• Bidentate → (bis-oxo).
• Reactivity: phenolate ortho-OH, aliphatic C–H abstraction, O-atom transfer, depending on core.
Mononuclear Copper–O$_2$ Species
• (λ${max}$ 345 nm, EPR ) – generated at −80 °C.
• PHM/DBM: superoxo vs. cupryl vs. hydroperoxo debated; all achieve sterically directed H-atom abstraction → R–OH.
• Ascorbate recycles .
Comparative Themes & Key Numbers
• Peroxo λ${max}$: MMO 720 nm, Cu$2$-side-on 340-350 nm.
• Q-state (Fe$^{IV}2$): 420 nm, Mössbauer mm s$^{-1}; EPR silent. • O–O Raman bands: – 1105 cm$^{-1}$ (Fe–superoxo) – 844 cm$^{-1}$ (Fe$2$-peroxo)
– 750 cm$^{-1}$ (Cu$2$-peroxo) • K${H}/K{D}$: 26 (CH$4$), ≈1 (C$2$H$6$).
• K$^+$ channel pore ~3 Å; Na$^+$ hydration shell radius ~3.6 Å.
Conceptual Take-Aways
• Metal centres enable multi-electron redox with stepwise PCET; protein matrix edits outcome (react vs. transport).
• Isotopic, spectroscopic (UV/Vis, Mössbauer, EPR, Raman), and fast-kinetics techniques disentangle fleeting intermediates.
• Ligand design (in enzymes or synthetic models) dictates nuclearity, O$2$ binding mode, electrophilic/nucleophilic character, and downstream chemistry. • Nature re-uses identical cores (e.g. Cu^{II}2(O_2^{2-})$$) for drastically different purposes by substrate positioning and secondary-sphere tuning.