The Liberal Way
Linear View of History
Liberal theory views history as linear rather than cyclical
History evolves in an overall positive direction
Creates progress in technology, ideas, society
View is based on liberal focus on markets and competition
Market competition creates incentives for innovation which leads to progress
Markets, competition, and technological innovation
Technologies compete and best ones win out
Disruptive technologies drive broader social and political change
They create new interests, actors, and distributions of power and new political issues
E.g. How did nuclear weapons change international relations and war?
Changed the potential outcomes of war
Threat of escalation made great power war almost impossible
Led to other forms of great power conflict
Social media as a disruptive technology?
Traditional media is dying
Decentralized information creation and distribution
Undermined traditional media and gave power to individuals/big tech
Led to fragmentation and polarization
Creates new political actors and issue
Politics, the marketplace of ideas, and political/social innovation
Innovation can occur in political ideas as well as technology
Political and social ideas compete in “a marketplace of ideas” and best ones win
E.g. racism, sexism, communism, ect, didn't work
Linear View of History
Liberal linear theory assumes that history, like evolution, moves in one overall direction
Progress is possible and the world can be changed for the better
History does not overall reverse or repeat itself
In development studies, ‘modernization theory’ is based on a linear view
There is one path to modernization and North is just ‘ahead’
E.g. economic development creates a middle class which demands democracy
Human Rights
In human rights, linear view underpins notion of ‘universal human rights’ - apply to all
Ideas about human rights compete and best win out
View human rights as ‘discovered’ not ‘invented’
Thus, human rights are universal not Western creation
Francis Fukuyama
Popularized as the ‘end of history’
Notion that capitalism and democracy had won in marketplace of ideas as the best forms of economic and political systems
All that remained was for them to continue to spread across the globe
Realist Way
Cyclical View of History
Realist theory in IR views history as cyclical
Realists are skeptical about the potential for progress
Instead they believe that history can reverse/repeat itself
For realists, international system is always ‘anarchic’ (no world government)
Means all states behave the same whether democracy or not, capitalist or not
For realists, they all seek power to ensure security under anarchy
Only difference between states is their amount of power
Hegemonic powers, greats powers, middle powers, small powers
Changes to the system are based on the rise and fall of different great powers\
Thus, repetition and cycles are a structural feature of IR
International system can be characterized by 3 possible structures:
unipolarity/hegemony (e.g. british or american empires)
Bipolarity (e.g. Cold War between US and USSR)
Multipolarity - when one power is declining and another is yet to rise
Hegemonic stability theory
Realist view unipolar systems as the most stable
Hegemonic state provides stability by: acting as the global cop/ providing global public goods including free trade and foreign aid
Periods of free trade and globalization occur in unipolar systems
Bipolar systems
For realists, bipolar systems are second most stable
Two great powers deter each other and this prevents war
E.g. US vs USSR balance of power
Multipolar Systems
Least stable
Multiple great powers lead to competition and war
Great power wars occur between hegemonic/bipolar periods
Hegemonic powers
Carries the seeds of its own destruction due to ‘imperial overstretch’
Hegemonic state provides global security, free trade, and foreign aid at the expense of its economy
Rival powers ‘free ride’ and catch up
Hegemonic power starts to decline
Nationalism rises as the population wants to spend less on providing global security, free trade, and foreign aid, ect.
Hegemon becomes more isolationist and protectionist
Rivals start to step in and potential for war increases
Current international system
Some realists say this is happening today
US overstretched through military spending, ‘forever wars,’ bases around the globe
China was allowed to join WTO, ‘free ride,’ and grow economy
Also explains US domestic politics
Rise of conservative nationalism in US
Tired of others ‘free riding’ and more isolationist
Feeling ‘ripped of’ by trade and more protectionist
America first and less foreign aid, less support for IOs
Implications?
Some realists argue it will lead to:
Protectionism and the end of economic globalization
End of liberal rules-based order
Great power war based on Thucydides trap
Thucydides’ trap
Concept developed by US realist Graham T. Allison
Based on view of ancient athenian historian thucydides that peloponnesian war was inevitable because of spartan fears of the growth of Athenian power
Allison applies it to US-China