non-biodegradable: not broken down by microorganisms in the environment
addition polymers are unreactive because:
they contain many C-C and C-H bonds.
these bonds are nonpolar and (relatively) strong, so are difficult to break.
pros of the lack of reactivity of addition polymers | cons of the lack of reactivity of addition polymers |
it makes them useful molecules, e.g. they can be used for containers for food and drinks without the polymer reacting with the contents | it makes them non-biodegradable, meaning they can pollute the environment for decades or longer and can cause harm to wildlife, e.g.
|
disadvantages of producing addition polymers:
the alkene monomers come from crude oil, which is a non-renewable resource.
the crude oil needs to be transported and refined, which requires lots of energy.
disadvantages of the disposal of addition polymers:
addition polymers are used in very large amounts, so occupy lots of space landfills.
they are non-biodegradable, so can pollute the environment for decades or longer and can cause harm to wildlife, e.g.
seabirds can become tangled in polymer waste or consume it, which can be fatal.
3 ways to reduce the negative effects of addition polymers:
1. combust waste polymers to generate energy, instead of sending them to landfill: | 2. polymer waste can be sorted then recycled into new products: | 3. feedstock recyling - waste polymers are converted back into simpler hydrocarbons that can then be cracked and converted into different polymers. |
pros:
| pros:
| pros:
|
cons:
| cons:
| cons:
|
biodegradable polymers:
not additon polymers.
based on biological material such as plants, which is a renewable resource.
naturally break down due to the action of microorganisms.
photodegradable polymers:
oil-based polymers which slowly break down in sunlight.