Resilience in Old Age: Social Relations as a Protective Factor
Full Terms & Conditions of Access
Full terms and conditions are accessible at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hrhd20
Journal Information
Research in Human Development
ISSN: 1542-7609 (Print), 1542-7617 (Online)
Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hrhd20
Article Citation
Authors: Heather Fuller-Iglesias, Besangie Sellars, Toni C. Antonucci
Title: Resilience in Old Age: Social Relations as a Protective Factor
Publication Year: 2008
Volume: 5, Issue 3, Pages 181-193
DOI: 10.1080/15427600802274043
Published online: September 3, 2008
Article views: 705
Citing articles count: 22
Introduction
Despite resilience traditionally being studied mostly in childhood and adolescence, it remains a significant concept throughout the lifespan.
Older adults face unique challenges which necessitate an examination of protective factors for resilience in this age group, particularly focusing on social relations.
Participants older than 65 years who experienced six or more major life events in the past twelve years were included from the Social Relations and Health study (N = 99).
Research Findings
Network Size & Spousal Relationship Quality
Network size and quality of spousal relationships were indicators of social relations.
Regression analyses reveal the following:
The young-old and White participants exhibited fewer depressive symptoms.
No gender differences were found in depressive symptoms; men reported higher life satisfaction compared to women.
Larger network size correlated with fewer depressive symptoms and higher life satisfaction.
Positive spousal relationship characteristics correlated with fewer depressive symptoms and greater life satisfaction.
Conversely, negative spousal relationship characteristics correlated with higher depressive symptoms and lower life satisfaction.
Importance of Social Relations
The research emphasizes the role of social relations in promoting resilience in older adults, suggesting these relations are a crucial protective factor in late life resilience.
Literature Review
Resilience is broadly defined as successful adaptation despite adversity, a concept that primarily emerged from studying children (Masten, 1994; Rutter, 2006).
Life Course Theory:
Suggests that both environmental factors and individual life stages influence development, leading to cumulative adversities as one ages (Baltes et al., 2006).
Types of Adversities:
External: Environmental challenges (e.g., poverty).
Internal: Biological challenges (e.g., health declines).
Regarding aging, individuals may not necessarily overcome internal adversities but may successfully cope (Rowe & Kahn, 1987).
Resilience in Children and Adolescents
Research highlights that many children thrive despite adverse conditions.
Protective Characteristics:
Resilience can arise from individual traits, family dynamics, and social environments (Werner & Smith, 2001).
Significant adult figures contribute positively to resilience outcomes (Elder, 1999).
Among adolescents, supportive peer relationships enhance resilience (Rubin, 1996).
Resilience in Old Age
Older adults experience increased psychosocial stressors, such as loss and chronic health issues (Davis et al., 2007).
Rowe & Kahn’s Model of Successful Aging:
Views successful aging as resilience against challenges across various life aspects (Rowe & Kahn, 1987).
Proposition:
Older adults adapting to aging-related challenges demonstrate resilience.
The Convoy Model of Social Relations
Proposed by Kahn and Antonucci (1980), it focuses on how social relations impact well-being.
Major elements of the model:
Personal factors, situational factors, and various social relations influence stress responses and coping abilities.
Dynamic Nature of Social Relations:
As personal circumstances and needs evolve, relationships must adapt to support the individual effectively in the face of adversity.
Social Relations and Resilience
Protective Factors:
Rutter (1987) identifies protective factors as both individual (e.g., self-efficacy) and social (e.g., social support).
Social support is crucial for combating stress associated with adversities.
Research establishes social relations positively influence adaptation among older adults (Hatch, 2005).
Coping Mechanisms:
Effective coping strategies are enriched by social support (Antonucci, 2001; Kahn & Antonucci, 1980).
Different Types of Social Relations:
Number and quality of social ties vary in impact on well-being (Lin et al., 1999).
Studies highlight spousal relationships have pronounced effects on mental health outcomes (Antonucci et al., 2001).
Research Objectives
Demographic Differences:
Exploring how age, gender, and culture influence resilience among older adults experiencing adversity.
Role of Social Relations:
Investigating how network size and the quality of spousal relationships relate to well-being in older adults amidst adversity.
Methodology
Sample Population:
Data from the Social Relations and Health over the Life Course study (2005), targeting adults aged 65+ (N = 292), focusing on those with high adversity (n = 99).
Measures of Adversity:
Assessment of life events (e.g., illness, financial issues, death of loved ones).
Cumulative life stress measured across 30 negative life events.
Measures of Social Relations:
Network Size: Measured using hierarchical network mapping techniques assessing closeness in social ties (Antonucci, 1986).
Spousal Relationship Quality: Evaluated using metrics of positive and negative relationship characteristics, assessed on a 5-point scale.
Psychological Well-Being Metrics:
Depressive Symptoms measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).
Life Satisfaction assessed through a single-item scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied).
Results
Demographic Variations in Resilience:
Younger adults (β = 0.20, p < 0.05) and White participants (β = -0.20, p < 0.05) reported fewer depressive symptoms.
No significant gender differences in depressive symptoms were found; men expressed higher life satisfaction than women (β = -0.22, p < 0.05).
Social Relations Impact:
Larger social networks correlated negatively with depressive symptoms and positively with life satisfaction among older adults facing adversity.
Higher positive spousal relationship quality associated with fewer depressive symptoms (negative relationship correlation established) and greater life satisfaction.
Conclusion
Findings demonstrate demographic differences play a role in resilience among older adults, specifically the influences of age, gender, and race on psychological well-being during adversity.
Emphasizes the significance of social relations, particularly the size of social networks and spousal relationship quality, for enhancing resilience in old age.
Further study is recommended to expand understanding of resilience and the protective factors associated with social relations across the lifespan.
References
Akiyama, H. et al. (2003). Negative interactions in close relationships across the lifespan.
Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Hierarchical mapping technique.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful.