Resilience in Old Age: Social Relations as a Protective Factor

Full Terms & Conditions of Access

  • Full terms and conditions are accessible at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hrhd20

Journal Information

  • Research in Human Development

  • ISSN: 1542-7609 (Print), 1542-7617 (Online)

  • Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hrhd20

Article Citation

  • Authors: Heather Fuller-Iglesias, Besangie Sellars, Toni C. Antonucci

  • Title: Resilience in Old Age: Social Relations as a Protective Factor

  • Publication Year: 2008

  • Volume: 5, Issue 3, Pages 181-193

  • DOI: 10.1080/15427600802274043

  • Published online: September 3, 2008

  • Article views: 705

  • Citing articles count: 22

Introduction

  • Despite resilience traditionally being studied mostly in childhood and adolescence, it remains a significant concept throughout the lifespan.

  • Older adults face unique challenges which necessitate an examination of protective factors for resilience in this age group, particularly focusing on social relations.

  • Participants older than 65 years who experienced six or more major life events in the past twelve years were included from the Social Relations and Health study (N = 99).

Research Findings

  • Network Size & Spousal Relationship Quality

    • Network size and quality of spousal relationships were indicators of social relations.

    • Regression analyses reveal the following:

    • The young-old and White participants exhibited fewer depressive symptoms.

    • No gender differences were found in depressive symptoms; men reported higher life satisfaction compared to women.

    • Larger network size correlated with fewer depressive symptoms and higher life satisfaction.

    • Positive spousal relationship characteristics correlated with fewer depressive symptoms and greater life satisfaction.

    • Conversely, negative spousal relationship characteristics correlated with higher depressive symptoms and lower life satisfaction.

  • Importance of Social Relations

    • The research emphasizes the role of social relations in promoting resilience in older adults, suggesting these relations are a crucial protective factor in late life resilience.

Literature Review

  • Resilience is broadly defined as successful adaptation despite adversity, a concept that primarily emerged from studying children (Masten, 1994; Rutter, 2006).

  • Life Course Theory:

    • Suggests that both environmental factors and individual life stages influence development, leading to cumulative adversities as one ages (Baltes et al., 2006).

  • Types of Adversities:

    • External: Environmental challenges (e.g., poverty).

    • Internal: Biological challenges (e.g., health declines).

  • Regarding aging, individuals may not necessarily overcome internal adversities but may successfully cope (Rowe & Kahn, 1987).

Resilience in Children and Adolescents

  • Research highlights that many children thrive despite adverse conditions.

  • Protective Characteristics:

    • Resilience can arise from individual traits, family dynamics, and social environments (Werner & Smith, 2001).

    • Significant adult figures contribute positively to resilience outcomes (Elder, 1999).

    • Among adolescents, supportive peer relationships enhance resilience (Rubin, 1996).

Resilience in Old Age

  • Older adults experience increased psychosocial stressors, such as loss and chronic health issues (Davis et al., 2007).

  • Rowe & Kahn’s Model of Successful Aging:

    • Views successful aging as resilience against challenges across various life aspects (Rowe & Kahn, 1987).

  • Proposition:

    • Older adults adapting to aging-related challenges demonstrate resilience.

The Convoy Model of Social Relations

  • Proposed by Kahn and Antonucci (1980), it focuses on how social relations impact well-being.

  • Major elements of the model:

    • Personal factors, situational factors, and various social relations influence stress responses and coping abilities.

  • Dynamic Nature of Social Relations:

    • As personal circumstances and needs evolve, relationships must adapt to support the individual effectively in the face of adversity.

Social Relations and Resilience

  • Protective Factors:

    • Rutter (1987) identifies protective factors as both individual (e.g., self-efficacy) and social (e.g., social support).

    • Social support is crucial for combating stress associated with adversities.

  • Research establishes social relations positively influence adaptation among older adults (Hatch, 2005).

  • Coping Mechanisms:

    • Effective coping strategies are enriched by social support (Antonucci, 2001; Kahn & Antonucci, 1980).

  • Different Types of Social Relations:

    • Number and quality of social ties vary in impact on well-being (Lin et al., 1999).

  • Studies highlight spousal relationships have pronounced effects on mental health outcomes (Antonucci et al., 2001).

Research Objectives

  1. Demographic Differences:

    • Exploring how age, gender, and culture influence resilience among older adults experiencing adversity.

  2. Role of Social Relations:

    • Investigating how network size and the quality of spousal relationships relate to well-being in older adults amidst adversity.

Methodology

  • Sample Population:

    • Data from the Social Relations and Health over the Life Course study (2005), targeting adults aged 65+ (N = 292), focusing on those with high adversity (n = 99).

  • Measures of Adversity:

    • Assessment of life events (e.g., illness, financial issues, death of loved ones).

    • Cumulative life stress measured across 30 negative life events.

  • Measures of Social Relations:

    • Network Size: Measured using hierarchical network mapping techniques assessing closeness in social ties (Antonucci, 1986).

    • Spousal Relationship Quality: Evaluated using metrics of positive and negative relationship characteristics, assessed on a 5-point scale.

  • Psychological Well-Being Metrics:

    • Depressive Symptoms measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

    • Life Satisfaction assessed through a single-item scale ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 7 (very dissatisfied).

Results

  • Demographic Variations in Resilience:

    • Younger adults (β = 0.20, p < 0.05) and White participants (β = -0.20, p < 0.05) reported fewer depressive symptoms.

    • No significant gender differences in depressive symptoms were found; men expressed higher life satisfaction than women (β = -0.22, p < 0.05).

  • Social Relations Impact:

    • Larger social networks correlated negatively with depressive symptoms and positively with life satisfaction among older adults facing adversity.

    • Higher positive spousal relationship quality associated with fewer depressive symptoms (negative relationship correlation established) and greater life satisfaction.

Conclusion

  • Findings demonstrate demographic differences play a role in resilience among older adults, specifically the influences of age, gender, and race on psychological well-being during adversity.

  • Emphasizes the significance of social relations, particularly the size of social networks and spousal relationship quality, for enhancing resilience in old age.

  • Further study is recommended to expand understanding of resilience and the protective factors associated with social relations across the lifespan.

References

  • Akiyama, H. et al. (2003). Negative interactions in close relationships across the lifespan.

  • Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Hierarchical mapping technique.

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging.

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful.