Ethnicity and educational attainment
Patterns of ethnic differences in achievement
Chinese and Indian students- Highest achievers
White working-class pupils- Among the lowest performers
Black Caribbean pupils- Underachieve compared to white British
Pakistani and Bangladeshi- Below average but improving
External factors-
Cultural deprivation-
Language- Some claim that EAL students are disadvantaged, however evidence shows that this isnt always the case
Attitudes and values- Some groups may lack deferred gratification
Sewell- Absence of tough love in black families may lead to poor behaviour
Asian families- Often supportive of education (high parental expectation)
Material deprivation-
Ethnic minorities are more likely to experience poverty
Impacts-
Lack of resources
Poor housing conditions
Part-time work to support family
Racism in wider society-
Racial discrimination leads to social exclusion- poverty= low achievement
Discrimination in job market (CV study)
Internal factors-
Teacher racism and labelling
Gillborn and Youdell- Teachers quicker to discipline black pupils, linked to racialised expectations
Wright- Asian pupils may be marginalised or patronised
Pupil responses and subcultures
Sewell identified 4 black boys responses to schooling-
Rebels
Conformists
Retreatists
Innovators
Fuller- Black girls in London rejected negative labels, worked hard to succeed
Institutional racism
Gillborn-
Marketisation allows schools to be selective- disadvantages Black pupils
Assessment system may be biased
‘Ethnocentric curriculum’- Values white culture (European history)
Evaluation
Not all ethnic minority students underachieve
Indian and Chinese students do well despite facing some discrimination
Cultural deprivation theories are criticised for blaming the victim
Internal factors better explain how schools reproduce inequality