Observer-Expectancy Effects in Research

Autism in Research Context

  • Discusses the importance of avoiding observer-expectancy effects when evaluating facilitated communication.

Observer-Expectancy Effects

  • Defined as the influence of the observer's expectations on the behavior of the subjects in an experiment.
  • Assessing the impact of observer knowledge on experiment outcomes is critical.

Example Scenario

  • Hypothesis: Subjects receiving treatment A will smile more than those receiving treatment B.
  • If the researcher expects treatment A to produce more smiles, this may unconsciously affect their behavior towards participants in both groups.
    • Example: The researcher might smile more at treatment A subjects, who in turn, may smile back more due to the positive feedback, leading to erroneous conclusions.
  • This would create an illusion that treatment A was responsible for the increased smiling, instead of the researcher’s own influence.

Observer Perceptions

  • Observers' expectations can not only alter subjects' behaviors but also influence how observers interpret those behaviors.
  • Referring back to the smiling experiment, an observer's expectation might skew their interpretations. - E.g., ambiguous facial expressions might be interpreted as smiles in one condition and as neutral or negative in another, depending on the observer's biases.

Preventing Observer-Expectancy Effects

  • Best practice to eliminate these effects is to keep observers blind to the experimental conditions that could lead to bias.
  • In typical between-groups experiments, the blind observer does not know which subjects received which treatments, eliminating the basis for biased expectations.
  • In the hypothetical smiling experiment, if the observer is unaware of the treatment assignment, bias is effectively reduced.

Case Study: DiMascio's Study

  • Reference to DiMascio's study on depression treatments:
    • Clinicians who evaluated the patients’ depression post-treatment were blind to the treatment conditions to avoid observer-expectancy effects.
    • Patients were instructed to avoid discussing their treatment during evaluation interviews, ensuring evaluators remained unbiased.

Suggested Considerations

  • Always implement strategies that ensure both observers and subjects are unaware of conditions that could lead to expectancy biases.
  • This involves blinding in experimental designs to guarantee more reliable and valid results.