Modern Principles of Economics: Taxes and Subsidies
Modern Principles of Economics: Taxes and Subsidies
Introduction
- This chapter discusses taxes and subsidies through the lens of supply, demand, and elasticity.
- Key Points:
- Who pays a tax is not determined by who writes the check to the government but rather by the relative elasticities of supply and demand.
- Commodity taxation generates revenue and results in deadweight loss, which is the reduction in gains from trade.
Commodity Taxes
- Definition: Taxes applied to goods, such as fuel, cigarettes, and liquor.
Collection Methods
- The government can collect a tax in two ways:
- Tax on Sellers: levied for every unit sold.
- Tax on Buyers: levied for every unit bought.
- The effect of a tax remains the same regardless of whether it is imposed on sellers or buyers.
- The determination of who pays the tax depends on the relative elasticities of supply and demand.
Who Ultimately Pays the Tax
Tax Wedge Concept
- A tax creates a tax wedge, defined as:
- Tax Wedge: ( ext{Tax} = ext{Price paid by buyers} - ext{Price received by sellers} )
- For instance, if the tax is $1:
- The buyer's price increases by $1 compared to the seller’s price.
- In the example diagram:
- New equilibrium quantity traded = 500 baskets of apples.
- Price paid by buyers = $2.65.
- Price received by sellers = $1.65.
Elasticity Implications
- Elasticity Definition: Measures how responsive the quantity demanded or supplied is to price changes.
- Tax incidence is influenced by elasticity:
- If demand is more elastic than supply, buyers bear less of the tax burden.
- If supply is more elastic than demand, sellers bear less of the tax burden.
Examples in Real Life
Health Insurance Mandate
- 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act:
- Mandates large employers to provide health insurance for employees.
- The elasticity of demand versus supply determines who bears the burden of this mandate:
- Firms are more adaptable, while workers face higher costs leaving the labor force.
- Thus, most of the tax burden is absorbed by workers.
Cigarette Taxes
- Cigarette taxes vary significantly by state, e.g., $3.20 in New Jersey vs. $0.86 in South Carolina.
- Demand for cigarettes is inelastic due to addiction:
- As supply is more elastic than demand, buyers ultimately bear more of the tax burden.
Effects of Commodity Taxes
- Without tax, consumer and producer surplus is maximized.
- With tax:
- Consumer and producer surplus decline while tax revenues increase.
- However, tax revenues increase less than the decline in surplus, resulting in a deadweight loss:
- Deadweight Loss: Represents the loss from trades that do not occur due to taxation.
Visual Representation of Taxes
- The diagrams illustrate how consumer surplus, producer surplus, and tax revenue are affected by the presence of a tax.
Elasticity and Deadweight Loss
Elasticity of Demand
- Deadweight loss from taxation decreases if demand becomes less elastic:
- Elastic Demand: A tax deters many trades leading to higher deadweight loss.
- Inelastic Demand: A tax deters fewer trades, leading to a smaller deadweight loss.
Elasticity of Supply
- Similar to demand:
- Elastic Supply: Higher deadweight loss due to lost trades from taxation.
- Inelastic Supply: Lower deadweight loss for the same reason.
Subsidies
Definition
- Subsidy: A payment from the government to consumers or producers, effectively functioning as a reverse tax.
Effects of Subsidies
- Similar to taxes, the allocation of subsidies does not depend on who receives the check from the government but on the relative elasticities of supply and demand.
- Subsidies are funded by taxpayers and may lead to inefficient increases in trade and deadweight loss:
- Deadweight Loss from Subsidies: Arises from trades that do not provide beneficial returns.
Visual Effects of Subsidies
- Price changes for buyers and sellers are represented, showing subsidy impacts on market equilibrium.
Comparative Analysis of Taxes and Subsidies
- When demand is more elastic than supply, suppliers face a higher tax burden and gain more from subsidies.
Case Studies in Subsidization
Cotton Subsidy Example
- In California, agricultural water subsidies significantly reduce costs for farmers:
- Farmers pay $20-$30 for water costing $200-$500.
- Demand for cotton is highly elastic, while supply is inelastic, resulting in farmers benefiting most from subsidies.
Wage Subsidy Proposal
- Edmund Phelps proposed wage subsidies to enhance low-wage employment:
- Potential benefits include reduced welfare payments, crime, drug dependency, and the culture of defeatism.
Key Takeaways
- Use of supply and demand principles helps analyze taxes and subsidies.
- The implications of taxes and subsidies depend on the relative elasticities of demand and supply.
- Markets become less efficient due to taxes and subsidies, creating deadweight loss.
- More elastic market sides tend to escape a larger portion of tax while benefitting more from subsidies.