Advanced Placement US History Course Introduction and Assessment and Skills Development

Pedagogical Philosophy and Assessment Standards

  • Teaching methods are designed to correct or confront common frustrations within the educational system, specifically avoiding assessments that leave students in the dark or are perceived as coming from "left field."
  • A priority is placed on eliminating constant, disorganized assessment practices often found in standardized history courses.
  • Note-taking is an essential requirement for the course to ensure student preparedness.
  • The classroom is a discussion-oriented environment. Students must arrive prepared to participate actively through verbal contributions.
  • During the initial weeks of the term, students must provide their last name every time they are called upon. This process facilitates the development of a seating chart and allows for the accurate tracking of participation on a roll sheet.

Instructional Materials and Foundational Pages

  • Instructional strategies are primarily located on page 182182 and page 186186.
  • Key principal pages for course skills begin on page 188188 and continue for approximately the next 1010 pages.
  • The materials are organized with a left-hand column that details the specific types of assessment activities students will perform.
  • Course assessments focus on application and analysis rather than simple identification or regurgitation. It is rarely requested of a student to simply state who a person was or what specifically happened, as it is assumed that students have already read the assigned content-level books.

Standardized Rubrics and Class-Specific Amendments

  • The history rubrics for the course begin on page 225225 and extend through page 229229.
  • A Document Based Question (DBQ) consists of a prompt and 77 primary source documents. Students are required to read, deconstruct, analyze, and organize these documents to formulate a response to the prompt.
  • While the AP College Board rubric allows a thesis statement or claim to be located in either the introduction or the conclusion, the specific rule for this class mandates that the thesis must appear at the end of the introduction. Failure to place the thesis at the end of the introduction results in an automatic reduction of 10%10\% from the assignment grade.
  • Topic sentences are strictly required at the beginning of every paragraph, even though the term "topic sentence" does not appear in the standard AP rubrics.
  • Full conclusions are mandatory for all writing assignments, despite the absence of an explicit "conclusion" requirement on the standard AP rubrics.

Academic Integrity and the Skills-Based Packet

  • Students are responsible for creating a skills-based package. This package is strictly prohibited from containing any historical content.
  • If a student is found with historical content (e.g., notes on the Song Dynasty) in front of them during an assessment, they will receive an automatic zero (00) on that assessment.
  • There is no opportunity for a make-up assignment following a violation of academic integrity.
  • Cheating is treated as a one-off offense with an immediate punishment, rather than a scaffolded disciplinary process.

Reasoning Processes and Historical Analysis

  • Page 2121 outlines critical components of the course reasoning processes.
  • When analyzing prompts or rubrics from the Course and Exam Description (CED) that include "and/or" phrasing, students are instructed to ignore the "or" and always fulfill the "and" portion. The only exception is if a student is struggling significantly, in which case they should write the strongest essay possible using the "or" option.
  • Page 2222 details the central reasoning processes used in historical writing: comparison, causation, and continuity and change.
  • When addressing causation, the response should not focus initially on effects.
  • Continuity and Change Over Time (CCOT) is identified as one of the most difficult concepts for students to master, requiring a deep understanding of the nuances of how things evolve over history.

Case Study: Analytical Framework for Democracy

  • When discussing a broad concept like democracy, the analysis must begin with a basic definition to describe the concept.
  • A comprehensive historical analysis of democracy requires asking two critical questions: "When?" and "Where?"
  • Geographical context is vital because democracy manifests differently in various parts of the world.
  • Temporal context is equally vital; for example, the democracy envisioned by the founding fathers is the polar opposite of the democracy practiced in the modern era.

Questions & Discussion

  • Question: What specific instructional strategies were highlighted on Friday?
  • Response (Balith): The instructional strategies mentioned were on page 182182 and page 186186.
  • Question: What is the first question that should be asked if the topic is "discuss democracy"?
  • Answer: "What is democracy?"
  • Follow-up Prompt: What other framing questions are necessary for discussing democracy?
  • Answer: "When and where?"