Patient's Bill of Rights

The Idea of Rights

  • The concept of rights is relatively new in human history.
  • Before constitutional democracies, rights were typically held by elite individuals such as the aristocracy and the ruling class.
    • The divine right of kings extended to aristocrats and royal families.
    • This included the right to rule and to subsist off the labor of others.
    • Aristocrats sometimes had the right of primae noctis.

Divine Rights and the Shift to Human Rights

  • Divine rights were considered granted by God or gods.
  • Similar ideas existed in non-Christian African and Asian countries, where emperors or leaders were seen as divinely empowered.
  • The idea of the nation-state challenged this, asserting equality among individuals.
  • A major shift occurred with the idea that rights are inherent to all humans by virtue of being human, given by God or nature.
  • Thinkers like John Locke, Rousseau, and Thomas Hobbes contributed to this idea

Evolution and Expansion of Rights

  • The extension of divine rights to all humans was theoretical and gradual.
  • Even with the abolition of slavery, full rights for women were not immediately recognized.

Problems with Enumeration and Scope of Rights

  • Enumeration: How many rights do we have?
  • Scope: What qualifies as a right?
  • Example: The concept of housing as a human right raises questions about what kind of housing and how it would be provided.

God-Given Rights vs. Natural Rights

  • Some believe rights are endowed by a creator (as stated in the Declaration of Independence: "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness").
    • Originally, it was "life, liberty, and the pursuit of property," which was changed to "happiness" to avoid implications regarding slavery.
  • The belief that God gives rights doesn't always translate to practical protection of those rights.
  • The idea of natural rights suggests that rights are nature-given rather than God-given.

Critiques of Natural Rights

  • Thomas Hobbes argued that nature dictates might makes right outside of a civil system.
  • Jeremy Bentham famously called natural rights "nonsense on stilts," questioning how rights can be derived from nature.

Civil Rights as Actual Rights

  • Human rights are ideals to aspire to.
  • Civil rights are entitlements within a society that are protected by law.
  • Denial of civil rights allows for recourse within the legal system.
  • Example: Being held in jail for more than 48 hours without charges violates due process rights.

The Practicality of Rights

  • Civil rights are determined by a society's constitution and case law.
  • Defining something as a human right means advocating for it to become a civil entitlement.
  • Providing housing for everyone is impractical and has historically led to negative outcomes.

Types of Rights

  • Rights: Negative, Positive and Derivative.

Negative Rights

  • A right not to be interfered with.
  • If it's legal to obtain something, nobody can hinder you from obtaining it.
  • The philosophy is: if it's not specifically illegal, it's legal.
  • Example: The decriminalization of marijuana provides a negative right to use it.

Positive Rights

  • A right to something or to assistance.
  • Example: The right to an attorney, even if you can't afford one.
  • Positive Rights: Rights to have something.
  • This includes food, housing, medical care, education, etc.
  • They imply an obligation on others to provide you with whatever it is that you are said to have a right to.
  • Unlike negative rights, with positive rights, there is the problem of enumeration and scope.

Derivative Rights

  • Rights derived based on utilitarian considerations.
  • Can be positive or negative, depending on what's best for society overall.

Rationing Health Care

  • Rationing health care acknowledges limited resources.

Microallocation

  • Rationing specific health care resources to specific patients.
  • Real-time decisions about who gets care, how much, and how fast.

Macroallocation

  • Rationing health care resources on a large and general scale.
  • Decisions about how much to spend on public health care at the city, town, state, or national level.