Chapter 5 Notes: Public Policing and Private Security (Siegel & Worrall, 17e)

Learning Objectives (5.1–5.9)

  • 5.1 Recount the early development of the police in England.
  • 5.2 Recount the development of the police in colonial America.
  • 5.3 Discuss the emergence of police professionalism.
  • 5.4 Identify the main events in policing between 1960 and the present.
  • 5.5 Identify the four levels of law enforcement in America.
  • 5.6 Identify the most prominent federal law enforcement agencies.
  • 5.7 Discuss the differences among local, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
  • 5.8 Discuss the differences between public and private policing.
  • 5.9 Identify various technologies currently used in law enforcement.

The History of Police in England

  • Early systems and structures
    • Pledge system with components:
    • Tything (group of 10 households)
    • Hundredman (constable) overseeing multiple tythings
    • Administrative units: shires and shire reeves
    • Watch system as a form of urban policing
    • Justice of the peace emerges as a local judicial/administrative figure
  • Private policing and thief takers
    • Private policing and thief takers are described as universally corrupt
    • Court bailiffs also served as thief takers
    • Notorious for violence
  • Fielding’s Bow Street Runners
    • A marked improvement over earlier private policing efforts
  • The London Metropolitan Police
    • Sir Robert Peel’s Metropolitan Police Act establishes the first organized police force in London
    • Early issues persist: corruption, limited effectiveness, and influence by the wealthy
    • Establishment of nine principles of policing

The History of Police in Colonial America

  • Colonial policing mirrored the British model
    • Roles: keeping the peace, fighting crime
    • Responsibilities: collecting taxes, supervising elections
    • Rural areas: slave patrols as an early form of law enforcement
    • Vigilantes used force or intimidation to combat social problems (e.g., livestock theft)
  • Early police agencies in major cities
    • Boston, New York, Philadelphia
    • Characteristics: political influence, primitive organization, little formal training, minimal legal education, limited supervision, and wide discretionary power
  • Twentieth-century reform and modernization
    • Police administrative boards installed to reduce corruption
    • State legislatures takeover of police functions
  • Emergence of professionalism
    • International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)
    • Civil service police forces
    • Centralized organizational structures
    • Specialized units
    • The Wickersham Commission and its impact on policing reforms

Policing from the 1960s to the Present

  • 1960s: Judicial limits and public tension
    • U.S. Supreme Court decisions aimed at controlling police operations and procedures
    • Growing tension between police and the public
    • Rising crime rate
  • 1970s: Federal funding and training emphasis
    • Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) provided substantial funding to police agencies
    • Emphasis on officer training and research
    • Focus on recruitment of women and minority recruits
  • 1980s: Role evolution and reform challenges
    • The police role was changing; unions grew; LEAA ended
    • Police–community relations remained a central issue
  • 1990s: Reform era and community policing
    • Rodney King incident accelerates reform efforts
    • Beginning of community policing strategies
    • Increased diversity in police departments
  • Since 2000: Post-9/11 reorganization and evidence-based policing
    • Federal agencies reorganized in response to September 11, 2001
    • Emergence of the evidence-based era
    • 2008 economic recession affecting policing resources and strategies

Discussion Activities (Overview)

  • Discussion Activity 1 (Think-Pair-Share ideas)
    • Watch a history video predating the 1960s and compare preconceived notions with the presented history
    • Reflect on how policing today differs, for better or worse
  • Discussion Activity 1 Debrief
    • Share favorite TV police show; identify the era depicted; connect show elements to historical policing
  • Discussion Activity 2
    • Rodney King incident: its role in prompting reforms and how policing might differ today without it
  • Discussion Activity 2 Debrief
    • Assess whether policing has improved since the 1960s; consider media bias and overlooked positive police work; propose future reform ideas

The Levels of Law Enforcement

  • The four levels of law enforcement: 44 levels – Federal, State, County, Local

The Agencies of Law Enforcement (1 of 4)

  • U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
    • Legal arm of the federal government; headed by the Attorney General
    • Divisions enforcing federal laws and protecting citizens
    • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
    • Handles violations of federal law, crime statistics, and operates a comprehensive crime lab

The Agencies of Law Enforcement (2 of 4)

  • Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
    • Controls sales of untaxed liquor and cigarettes and illegal gun activities
  • U.S. Marshals Service
    • Judicial security, fugitive apprehension, witness protection, prisoner operations, transport for prisoners and aliens, asset forfeiture program

The Agencies of Law Enforcement (3 of 4)

  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
    • Core mission: prevent terrorist attacks, reduce vulnerability, minimize damage and aid recovery from attacks
    • Agencies included: Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Secret Service

The Agencies of Law Enforcement (4 of 4)

  • State law enforcement agencies
    • Created by legislation to address nonurban crime and enforcement needs
  • County law enforcement agencies
    • Some sheriff’s departments are devoted solely to law enforcement; others handle court-related duties or corrections/judicial matters
  • Metropolitan law enforcement agencies
    • Make up the majority of the nation’s law enforcement workforce

Differences Between Federal, State, County, and Metropolitan Law Enforcement (Concept Summary 5.1)

  • Jurisdiction
    • Federal: EntireextUnitedStatesEntire ext{United States}
    • State: StateState
    • County sheriff: CountyCounty, mostly unincorporated areas
    • Metropolitan: MetropolitanextpoliceMetropolitan ext{police} jurisdictions
  • Crimes most often targeted
    • Federal: Violations of federal law
    • State patrol/police: Violations of state law; traffic on highways
    • County sheriff: Violations of state law and county ordinances
    • Metropolitan police: Violations of state laws and city ordinances
  • Area of operation
    • Federal: nationwide
    • State: within a single state
    • County: within county boundaries
    • Metropolitan: within a city or metropolitan area

Think-Pair-Share Activity

  • Think about the most recent crime-related TV show and its portrayal of criminals, police, crime, and fear
  • Discuss whether the show reflects reality; consider impact on public perception and fear

Private Policing (1 of 4)

  • A multibillion-dollar industry
    • > 10,00010{,}000 firms and >2,000,0002{,}000{,}000 employees
    • Some private security firms have grown into billion-dollar companies
  • Reasons for private policing
    • Nongovernmental provision of services, especially crime control
    • Growth of mass private property
    • Belief that government police cannot provide desired level of service or presence

Private Policing (2 of 4)

  • Private vs public policing comparisons
    • Concerns: privatization may prioritize profit and client interests over public welfare
    • Public policing focuses primarily on enforcing criminal law
    • Private policing could potentially replace government policing

Private Policing (3 of 4)

  • Four distinguishing factors between private and public police
    • Focus on loss (protection from theft) rather than crime prevention
    • Preventive methods (surveillance technologies such as CCTV)
    • Private justice (consequences imposed by private companies; matters may be shielded from public view)
    • Private property focus (primarily concerned with private property rather than public interests)

Private Policing (4 of 4)

  • Types of private policing
    • Protective, Intelligence, Publicly contracted, Corporate policing

Criticisms of Private Policing

  • Primacy of motive and profit pressures
  • Potential to replace government/public police
  • Legal scrutiny and accountability concerns

Technology and Law Enforcement (1 of 4)

  • Identifying criminals
    • Linking computer software; Computerized imaging systems; Data mining

Technology and Law Enforcement (2 of 4)

  • Locating criminals
    • Gun detectors; CCTV; Enclosed Space Detection System; Thermal imagers

Technology and Law Enforcement (3 of 4)

  • Crime scene investigation
    • High-definition surveying (HDS)

Technology and Law Enforcement (4 of 4)

  • Crime mapping and profiling tools
    • Crime mapping: Hot spots; Alternative mapping initiatives; GPS
  • Biometrics and identification
    • Fingerprint identification; Voice; Retina; Facial features; Handwriting
    • Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS)
  • DNA and data networks
    • DNA profiling: CODIS (Combined DNA Index System)
  • Social media and networking
    • Platforms: Facebook, Myspace, Twitter
  • Predictive policing
    • Forecasting/predicting crimes; identifying at-risk individuals/offenders; predicting perpetrators’ identities (profiling) and victims

Polling/Survey Activity

  • Ethical questions about advances in technology and their use by law enforcement
  • Create a chart of results; record age and gender; analyze trends
  • Questions: Which advances raise ethical concerns for suspects? Do advances invade privacy?

Self-Assessment

  • List problems faced by today’s police departments that were present in the early days
  • Identify technological advances that should help solve more crimes and discuss their potential dangers

Summary (1 of 2)

  • Recount the early development of the police in England
  • Recount the development of the police in colonial America
  • Discuss the emergence of police professionalism
  • Identify the main events in policing between the 1960s and the present
  • Identify the four levels of law enforcement in America

Summary (2 of 2)

  • Identify the most prominent federal law enforcement agencies
  • Discuss differences among local, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies
  • Discuss differences between public and private policing
  • Identify various technologies currently used in law enforcement

Additional Notes

  • Icebreaker prompts (from Page 2): consider duties and challenges of different officer types (federal, state, local, private)
  • Written Assignment Activities (Page 11): essays and timelines for England and colonial America; comparison of timelines
  • Visual cue: “Violent Crime in Providence, Rhode Island” indicates examples or case visuals used in the chapter
  • The nine principles of policing (Peel) are highlighted as foundational ideals for modern policing
  • Wickersham Commission referenced as a landmark reform effort in the professionalization of policing
  • LEAA (Law Enforcement Assistance Administration) played a key role in funding training and research during the 1970s
  • Rodney King incident cited as a catalyst for reforms and a shift toward community policing
  • CODIS (Combined DNA Index System) and AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System) are key biometric/molecular tools in modern policing
  • Predictive policing and profiling are introduced as forward-looking but ethically debated technologies