Defining Drawing: Past, Present, and Future

What is Drawing?

  • Introduction

    • Continuous Incompleteness: The concept of drawing is complex, prompting an ongoing debate reflecting diverse materials and processes.

    • Range of Perspectives: Drawing can encompass various forms like pencil on paper, performance, conversations, and symbolic traces like contrails from jets.

    • Agreement on Diversity: All perspectives on drawing are valid; reframing the question allows for exploration beyond physicality into content and intent.

  • Key Points

    • Mutability of Drawing: Drawing is not static or singular; it evolves with new forms, technologies, and conceptual attitudes.

    • Cultural Exclusions: The definition of drawing often overlooks cultural applications like Maori tattooing or Chinese calligraphy, but acknowledges interrelations with disciplines like Archaeology and Physics.

    • Parameters for Discussion: Definitions must be narrowed to focus on a multifaceted activity that challenges conventional boundaries.

Exploring the Questions of Drawing

  • Extrapolated Questions

    • Drawing's Past: Are there traits specific to drawing and why?

    • Current State of Drawing: What is currently being done in drawing and why?

  • Temporal Framework

    • Drawing is both a present action and a trace of past gestures.

    • The term 'drawing' functions as both noun (completed object) and verb (ongoing action).

    • Historical Re-examination: Drawing, traditionally seen as preparatory work, is redefined as a primary medium in contemporary discourse.

Historical Viewpoint on Drawing

  • Secondary Status Historically:

    • Drawing was historically seen as a preparatory step for other artistic forms like painting and sculpture, as noted by Jean Fisher.

    • Functionality of Drawing: Characterized as anticipatory, serving to resolve issues for later works rather than being an end in itself.

    • Art Institutions' Influence: Art schools historically taught drawing as a subsidiary skill, valuing technical ability tied to natural depiction.

    • Objective Standards: An objective value system for drawing, tied to historical conventions, was maintained by art academies.

  • Influential Texts and Figures:

    • John Ruskin: The Elements of Drawing establishes technical drawing standards (1857).

    • Henry Tonks: Developed a twelve-point definition of drawing technique in Elementary Propositions in Drawing and Painting (1910).

    • Practical Exercises: Emphasis on observational drawing from nature and plaster casts, solidifying a conservative, representational view of drawing.

Changing Views on Drawing

  • Evolving Perspectives Since Modernism:

    • With Modernism, drawing began to be investigated as an independent discipline amidst changing attitudes regarding creativity and representation.

    • Contemporary Misconceptions:

    • Misconception that there exists a singular form of ‘good drawing’.

    • Historical misunderstanding that all past drawings adhered to strict ‘good’ standards.

    • Artists' Views: Artist Michael Craig-Martin noted the diverse uses of line in drawing spanning different time periods and cultures.

  • Concept of Invention in Drawing:

    • Barbara Rose's Argument: Drawing is rooted in intellectual invention, not only technique; historical predecessors equate drawing with the creation of ideas.

    • Example of Marcel Duchamp’s L.H.O.O.Q. and Robert Rauschenberg’s Erased De Kooning Drawing demonstrate drawing's conceptual potential.

    • Contemporary Works: Rose's emphasis on process-based drawing and the notion of ‘autographic’ drawing (self-revelatory, personal communication).

The Current Landscape of Drawing

  • Post-1990s Resurgence:

    • Drawing has gained renewed recognition and activity both nationally and internationally.

    • Key considerations surrounding this revival include its rediscovery and its relevance in critiques drawn from other disciplines like Music and Science.

  • The Role of Digital Media:

    • Drawing is celebrated as a manual counteraction to digital processes, emphasizing its physicality and uniqueness.

    • Artistic value is found in traditional methods, contrasting with the fast-paced, reproducible digital art environment.

  • Democratic Nature of Drawing:

    • Drawing’s interdisciplinary flexibility allows engagement across varied fields and contexts.

    • As representational aims diminish, drawing becomes a more universally accessible medium.

  • Market Factors Impacting Drawing:

    • Renewed market interest in drawing attributed to its affordability and adaptability in exhibition contexts like the international art fairs in the 1990s.

    • Drawing viewed as a ‘stopgap’ art medium, highlighting its role amid economic shifts in the art world.

The Future of Drawing

  • Contemporary Challenges: Is the rise of drawing part of a medium fetishization?

    • Questions about the specificity of drawing content and its thematic connections must be continually assessed.

  • Norman Bryson on Drawing:

    • Describing drawing as a practice existing in continuous present-tense, it embodies a state of becoming that never reaches closure, linking process with conceptual development.