Constructivism
Emergence of Constructivism
Emerges as a critical response to various realisms and liberalisms/idealisms following the Cold War.
Realisms and liberalisms/idealisms predicted a catastrophic end to the Cold War or a continuation indefinitely.
Constructivism borrows from existing status quo ideas and schools of thought.
Consequences of the emergence of Constructivism:
Not as revolutionary: Compared to other more critical schools of thought.
Popularity in mainstream IR: Constructivism's approach enables it to gain acceptance.
Realisms and liberalisms/idealisms do not interrogate the identity and socialization of ideas.
General Elements of Constructivism
(1) Social Constructions
Realism: Believes states have fixed interests that often conflict with those of other states.
Idealism: Proposes that certain values are universal and shape state interests.
Constructivist Responses:
Interests and values do not emerge in a vacuum; they are socially constructed.
Social constructions significantly shape identity, interest, and values.
Values, interests, and identities are fluid rather than static.
Power and values remain significant in shaping state behavior.
(2) Social Facts
Brute Facts vs. Social Facts:
Brute facts: Examples include the existence of rocks.
Social facts: Defined by society, influenced by historical and contemporary events.
Historical and contemporary events or values are interpreted differently, leading to varying “realities” and identities.
Constructivists argue that social facts deserve as much importance as brute facts.
They aim to understand how social facts emerge and how they lead to shared practices and collective definitions.
(3) Anarchy
Conventional schools like Realisms and liberalisms/idealisms make certain assumptions:
States operate in anarchic conditions.
States are self-interested.
Constructivist Argument:
The particular manifestation of anarchy emerges from social relations and is subject to change.
If hostility characterizes the existing anarchy, it is a consequence of historical and contemporary relations.
Constructivism and Power
Power is essential; however, it should not be solely defined through material means, such as physical or economic force.
Constructivism expands the definition of power to include:
Ideas: Example: Legitimacy is crucial and entails mitigating material power (connecting to Carr’s proto-realism).
Knowledge: Refers to fluid perspectives on what power can entail.
Different interpretations of power yield alternative actions and consequences, driven by norms.
Norms are developed through social interactions.
Alexander Wendt - Background
Alexander Wendt, born in 1958, is a professor of political science at Ohio State University.
Often referred to as the “founding father” of constructivism.
He is renowned for his influential article titled "Anarchy is What States Make of It."
Issues with Other Schools of Thought
Conventional views claim anarchy forces states to pursue self-interest.
Idealism, classical liberalism, and neoliberalism: Primarily economic considerations.
Proto-realism, classical realism, and neorealism: Emphasis on power and survival.
Constructivist Departure:
Highlights the importance of identity.
Stresses the significance of interest formation.
Views anarchy as a changeable institution, disputing the notion that it is an inherent or fixed feature of international relations.
Constructivism and Anarchy
Conventional schools fail to adequately explain the relationship between anarchy and state behavior.
States exhibit differing reactions to friends versus enemies, irrespective of anarchy.
Self-interest and power alone do not provide a complete understanding of state behavior.
Meaning of Power: Responses to power fluctuate according to established relationships and identities.
These are historically determined and reinforced through ongoing engagements.
Different Directions of Constructivism
(1) Sovereignty, Recognition, Security
The concept of sovereignty is often assumed by conventional schools.
Constructivist Sovereignty:
Socially mediated; resulting in diverse meanings, understandings, and expectations.
Historically varies from current interpretations.
Relies on mutual recognition and permissions from other states.
Shared expectations within an internationally socialized community can generate security despite existing power disparities.
(2) Identity Transformations Promote Cooperation
Identities are susceptible to change.
Ongoing engagements and interactions contribute to the evolution of identities.
Changes in identity can facilitate the development of norms.
Self-interest has the potential to transition into collective interests.
(3) Self-Reflection and Collective Security
Insecurity stems from conditions of distrust, heavily influenced by specific identities.
Changes in identity are achievable via self-reflection.
Altercasting: The act of unilaterally changing one’s identity.
Changes to Identity:
Remove excuses for hostility.
Encourage reciprocation of changes by former enemies.
Adjust policy from a competitive to a cooperative system, fostering trust.