Chp. 10 International Management
Chapter 10: Managing Political Risk, Government Relations, and Alliances
The Nature and Analysis of Political Risk
Definition: Political risk refers to the unanticipated likelihood that a multinational corporation's (MNC's) foreign investments will be adversely affected by a host government’s policies.
Key Characteristics:
- Political risks are particularly prevalent in emerging economies around the world.
- Case Study: After joining the World Trade Organization (WTO), China enacted policies that created new political risks for MNCs operating there includes:
- Price controls
- Currency restrictions
- Sales limits on state-owned enterprises
- Restriction on the flow of convertible currency out of China
- Challenges like industrial piracy and ambiguous interpretations of regulations
- Chinese MNCs also face political risks in the U.S.
Macro and Micro Analysis of Political Risk
Macro Political Risk Analysis:
- Focuses on major political decisions that affect all businesses in a country.
- Example: China’s restrictions on foreign exchange transactions impact all MNCs.Micro Political Risk Analysis:
- Targets government policies that affect specific sectors or businesses.
- Example: U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum are micro risks affecting particular industries.
Macro Risk Issues and Examples
There are numerous countries grappling with economic troubles.
- Russia has increased controls over foreign currency.
- India poses a challenge with its convoluted legal and bureaucratic processes, leading MNCs to accept counterfeiting risks.
- India's slow judiciary promotes non-compliance.
- Foreign investors in Vietnam are mandated to enter joint ventures (JVs) with local partners.
- Central and Eastern Europe and Latin American countries (like Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador) present macro political risks.
- A significant macro political risk is government corruption, including bribery.
Micro Risk Issues and Examples
Core Essence: Micro risks often involve differential treatment of MNCs.
- Historical Context: U.S. steel producers accused foreign steelmakers of dumping products at below-market prices.
- Example: A 2018 steel tariff affected not only steel importers but also MNCs manufacturing products with steel, such as washing machines and vehicles.
- WTO and EU regulations introduced new micro political risks:
- The WTO deemed the U.S. 1916 Anti-Dumping Act as conflicting with global trade regulations, restricting American firms from leveraging it against imports.
- The EU’s authority to scrutinize and block significant mergers and acquisitions introduces uncertainty regarding regulatory compliance.
- Sometimes it can be ambiguous whether macro or micro risks are in effect.
Terrorism and Its Overseas Expansion
Definition: Terrorism is the application of force or violence against others intended to promote political or social ideologies.
Classification of Terrorism:
- Classic terrorism: well-defined objectives pursued by trained individuals (e.g., organized groups).
- Amateur terrorism: sporadic acts by individuals with unclear motives.
- Religiously motivated terrorism: driven by strong convictions with less focus on defined goals.MNCs must navigate potential hostile political climates in regions with a high likelihood of terrorism during overseas expansions.
Analyzing the Expropriation Risk
Definition: Expropriation refers to the seizure of businesses without adequate compensation to their owners.
Drivers of Expropriation:
- Indigenization laws may necessitate that local nationals hold major stakes in operations.Noteworthy Considerations:
- Industries highly susceptible to expropriation include extractive, agricultural, and infrastructural fields.
- Larger firms often present more substantial targets for expropriation compared to small firms.Minimizing Expropriation Risk: MNCs may employ several strategies:
- Form partnerships with local businesses.
- Limit the application of advanced technology to prevent local reproduction if expropriated.
- Develop affiliates reliant on the parent firm for critical operational aspects.
Managing Political Risk and Government Relations
Initial Steps: MNCs must conduct a detailed analysis of the political risks they will face.
Risk Management Framework:
- Development of a comprehensive framework to categorize various political risks and assign quantitative ratings for each risk.
- A three-dimensional framework should integrate:
- Political risks
- Types of general investments
- Special investments
Political Risks
Types of Political Risks:
- Transfer Risks: Result from government policies restricting the movement of capital, payments, production, personnel, and technology.
- Examples include export/import tariffs and restrictions on capital repatriation.
- Operational Risks: Arise from government regulations constraining local operations.
- Examples include price controls, financing limits, export requirements, taxes, and local sourcing mandates.
- Ownership-Control Risks: Involves governmental restrictions that affect ownership or control over local operational entities.
- Examples include foreign ownership caps and confiscations.
General Nature of Investment
Conglomerate Investment: Involves production of dissimilar goods or services to those at home; typically considered high-risk investments due to perceived limited benefits to the host country versus MNCs.
Vertical Investments: Focuses on the production of raw materials or intermediary goods for further processing; subject to government takeover due to their export nature.
Horizontal Investments: Focuses on goods/services matching the home market; made to satisfy local demand, with lower risk of government takeover.
Special Nature of Investments
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Categorized by economic sector, technological sophistication, and ownership structure:
- Primary Sector: Agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction; higher risk.
- Industrial Sector: Manufacturing operations; medium risk.
- Service Sector: Transport, finance, insurance; lowest risk.Types of Special Investments:
- From type one (highest risk) to type five (lowest risk) based on sector engagement and technological dependency.
- Firms with unique technology face lower risk than those with readily available tech.
- Wholly owned subsidiaries have greater risk than partially owned entities.
Quantifying the Variables in Managing Political Risk
MNCs evaluate political risk through a multi-variable analysis for an overall risk rating.
Comparison Capability:
- MNCs can juxtapose political risk ratings across different locales.Three Quantified Factors:
- Political and Economic Environment
- Domestic Economic Conditions
- External Economic Conditions
Techniques for Responding to Political Risk
Analyzing political risk can be accomplished via frameworks or quantitative analyses. MNCs must respond effectively to these risks:
- Careful development of response strategies is essential.
- Establishing positive government relationships can lead to mitigating risks proactively:
- Three related strategies include:
- Relative bargaining power analysis
- Integrative, protective, and defensive techniques
- Proactive political strategies
Relative Bargaining Power Analysis
Definition: This principle maintains that the MNC seeks to maintain bargaining power superior to that of the host nation.
Key Example: An MNC possessing proprietary technology unavailable domestically can bolster its position should expropriation arise.
Factors Influencing Bargaining Power: Include host perceptions of MNC size, experience, and market legitimacy.
Integrative, Protective, and Defensive Techniques
Integrative Techniques: Embed operations within the host’s infrastructure:
- Foster political relations with the host government.
- Strive to produce products locally, leveraging regional suppliers.
- Form JVs and hire local management.
- Conduct local R&D and establish productive labor relations.Protective/Defensive Techniques: Minimize host government interference:
- Limit local manufacturing; handle R&D offshore.
- Hire only essential local personnel; raise capital from diverse sources.
- Diversify operations across multiple countries.
Proactive Political Strategies
Addressing unpredictable governmental changes requires a strategic approach:
Proactive political strategies aim to shape political environments prior to firm impacts.
- These strategies become vital in politically unstable regions and may include:
- Formal lobbying efforts
- Campaign financing initiatives
- Advocacy outreach through embassies/consulates
- PR campaigns to manage public perception
- Sustaining communication with political entitiesWhile no singular strategy guarantees success, building relationships aids MNCs in executing their ventures.
Managing Alliances
Overview: MNC partners may include former state-owned companies, and relationships with government entities can be complex.
Joint Ventures: Many foreign investors, particularly in China, create alliances with state-owned firms to enhance market entry success in international markets.
- Challenge: Managing alliances, particularly with government-linked partners, poses distinct difficulties.
The Alliance Challenge
Research Focus: Specifically, how alliances form through interfirm negotiation processes.
Cultural Management: Successful alliances require the navigation of operations across diverse national cultures.
Challenges:
- Anticipating potential alliance termination complexities (both legal and business).
- Recognizing life cycle stages of alliances similar to businesses.
The Role of Host Governments in Alliances
Ownership Sharing: Many host governments mandate joint ownership of subsidiaries with local entities; this can occur even if alliances/JVs aren’t compulsory.
Benefits: MNCs may find strategic advantages in forming alliances for market entry and expansion beyond mere compliance.
Roles Through Alliance Lifecycle: Host governments play significant roles throughout the creation, management, and dissolution of alliances.
Challenges and Opportunities in Alliance Management
Joint Ventures: Increasingly popular among multinational corporations (MNCs), with successful instances noted in various sectors (e.g., Honda and GM).
Decision-Making: MNCs need to navigate numerous decisions surrounding international joint ventures (IJVs) amidst bureaucratic environments.
- Example: Vietnam has opened its market, yet foreign investors encounter mixed signals, seen in Ford's operational experiences.