tolerance mechanism
Mechanism of DNA Damage Tolerance
Introduction
Author: Xin Bi, University of Rochester
Supported by National Science Foundation
Open-access publication under CC BY-NC 4.0 license
Abstract
DNA damage compromises genome integrity and can lead to cell death.
Cells utilize various mechanisms to respond to DNA damage:
Damage repair
Damage tolerance (DT)
Damage checkpoints
DT pathway enables bypass of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) lesions during replication, preventing replication stalling.
Two main branches of DT:
Translesion Synthesis (TLS):
Involves replacement of a replicative DNA polymerase with a specialized TLS polymerase.
Intrinsically error-prone.
Template Switching (TS):
Error-free mechanism involving switching from a damaged template to an undamaged sister strand.
Current understanding of these pathways is limited, with ongoing research into their components and regulation.
DNA Damage Tolerance Mechanisms
Genomic DNA faces damage from both internal and external sources leading to various lesions.
DNA repair mechanisms include:
Homologous Recombination (HR) and Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) for double-strand breaks (DSBs).
Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER), Base Excision Repair (BER), and DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) for single-strand lesions.
DNA Damage Tolerance (DDT) allows replication to bypass DNA damage while postponing repair.
DDT Process Overview
Stalling caused by DNA damage creates a ssDNA gap, which is filled by:
TLS: uses specialized polymerases like Pol ζ or η, but is error-prone.
TS: uses a newly synthesized undamaged sister strand, promoting error-free repair.
Key Components in DDT
PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) plays a critical role in DDT regulation through post-translational modifications:
Mono-ubiquitination promotes TLS by recruiting TLS polymerases.
Poly-ubiquitination activates the Rad5-dependent error-free TS pathway.
Other important factors involved in DDT:
MRX complex: aids in DSB processing and interacts with DDT pathways.
Ino80 complex: supports fork recovery and facilitates Rad18 recruitment.
9-1-1 complex: acts as a damage sensor and facilitates TLS.
Srs2 helicase: inhibits unwanted recombination during DNA replication.
Error-Free Template Switching
TS involves:
Formation of a presynaptic filament with Rad51.
Strand invasion by complementary sister strands.
Gap filling by replicative polymerase, leading to Sister Chromatid Junction (SCJ) formation.
SCJ is resolved to yield two duplex DNA strands after repair synthesis, thus completing the bypass process.
Salvage Homologous Recombination Pathway
Salvage HR is an alternative pathway that can promote error-free lesion bypass without PCNA ubiquitination.
It activates under different cell cycle phases, usually late S or G2/M phase.
Involves similar components as the Rad5 pathway.
Regulatory Mechanisms for DDT Pathway Choice
Choice between TLS, Rad5-dependent TS, and salvage HR impacts genome stability significantly.
Consultation with components like Srs2, Elg1, and Hmo1 can influence DDT pathway preference:
Srs2 prevents overreliance on hyper-recombination pathways.
The activity of Hmo1 is involved in maintaining error-free repair processes.
Conclusion
Advances have been made in understanding DDT and its components, yet numerous questions remain about regulatory mechanisms and pathway selection.
Future research will focus on elucidating the interplay between DDT machinery, pathways, and chromatin structure.