Nurse impairments

Background

  • Critical illness leads to distress from inability to speak.

  • Communication in ICUs has not been systematically studied.

  • Study aims to describe methods and assistive techniques in nurse-patient communication for nonspeaking patients.

Objectives

  • Examine communication interactions, methods, and techniques between nurses and critically ill patients who cannot speak.

Methods

  • Descriptive observational study of ICU communication.

  • Videorecording interactions between nurses and 30 critically ill adults (15 per unit).

  • Ratings for frequency, success, quality, and communication techniques employed.

Results

  • Communication Exchanges: Nurses initiated 86.2% of exchanges with a completion rate of 2.62 exchanges/min.

  • Positive Nurse Behaviors: Eye contact was the most common positive act.

  • Pain Communication: 37.7% of pain communications were unsuccessful.

  • Patient Ratings: 40% of interactions were rated as difficult by patients.

  • Assistive Communication: Rarely used; limited to writing supplies or boards.

Conclusions

  • There are critical needs for improving communication in ICUs, particularly around pain and the use of assistive communication strategies.

Page 2

Study Significance

  • Communication difficulties lead to emotional distress, including panic and frustration.

  • Understanding current practices highlights areas to improve clinician-patient interaction.

  • Previous studies showed limited communication ability in ICU due to mechanical ventilation.

Historical Context

  • Prior studies observed primarily short, task-oriented communications.<br>

  • Communication has remained largely unchanged, indicating a need for improvement.

Page 3

Research Questions

  1. What is the frequency, success, and quality of communications between nurses and nonspeaking ICU patients?

  2. How do patients rate the ease of communication?

  3. What communication methods and strategies are employed?

Study Design

  • Descriptive observational analysis as part of the SPEACS trial.

  • Observations conducted in two ICU settings (MICU & CTICU).

Setting and Sample

  • Patients included were 30 ICU patients likely intubated for at least 48 hours and scored 13+ on the Glasgow Coma Scale.

  • Nurse participants were experienced RNs with pre-defined criteria for inclusion in the study.

Page 4

Participant Criteria

Nurse Participants

  • 10 RNs selected with at least 1 year of ICU experience, English-speaking, permanent staff.

  • No prior augmentative communication training.

Patient Participants

  • Enrolled based on availability and meeting criteria, including age and nonspeaking status due to intubation.

Data Collection

  • Communication via videos was recorded over four sessions.

  • Field notes documented interactions, communication methods, and patient behaviors.

Page 5

Communication Measurement

  • Frequency: Measured by act tallying. Average of 9.32 exchanges/session.

  • Initiation: Measured as the ratio of nurse-initiated to patient-initiated exchanges.

  • Successfulness: Rated on a 5-point scale assessing message clarity and reception.

  • Quality: Positive and negative behaviors tracked during exchanges.

Findings

  • Majority (82.6%) of communication initiated by nurses.

  • Patients exhibited only minimal initiation (12%) of communication exchanges.

Page 6

Communication Acts

  • Defined as units of communicative behavior directed toward another participant.

  • Rated for positive (eye contact, open-ended questions) and negative behaviors (lack of eye contact, rapid speech).

Ease of Communication Assessment

  • Patients rated difficulties on a 5-point scale, with reports of challenges experienced in interactions with nurses.

Page 7

Demographics

  • Across 120 observed sessions, communication acts totaled 5140, with 943 exchanges categorized.

  • Notable demographic data of patients and nurses presented, showing diverse backgrounds among participants.

Page 8

Communication Patterns

  • Succinct exchanges were common, with high rates of nurse initiations.

  • Many communication acts consisted of simple query and acknowledgment interactions.

Quality of Communication

  • Compiling emotional responses revealed areas of improvement for facilitating better communication techniques and interventions in the ICU settings.

Page 9

Conclusions

  • Comparison of positive/negative nurse actions showed effective communication isn’t reflected in the interactions.

  • Results suggest training and improved methods are necessary for better patient-centered communication in critical care settings.

Recommendations

  • Immediate Action: Develop and implement evidence-based training for effective communication strategies.

  • Long-term Goals: Research interventions to enhance communication during critical illness, particularly regarding pain and discomfort.

Acknowledgments

  • Thanks given to statistical and clinical support contributors.

  • Financial disclosures and study references provided for further reading.